Football statistics for Lansing Ignite
Team Info
Season
2019
Country
USA
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 17 | 61% | 71% | 50% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 11 | 39% | 36% | 43% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 14 | 50% | 57% | 43% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 14 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 11 | 39% | 50% | 29% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 9 | 30% | 29% | 31% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 15 | 52% | 47% | 57% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 10 | 34% | 21% | 47% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 16 | 53% | 44% | 64% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 11 | 39% | 43% | 36% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 25 | 89% | 93% | 86% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 26 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 24 | 86% | 93% | 79% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 25 | 83% | 86% | 81% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 28 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 27 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 28 | 93% | 88% | 100% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 24 | 86% | 79% | 93% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 15 | 54% | 64% | 43% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 22 | 79% | 93% | 64% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 22 | 79% | 79% | 79% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 19 | 68% | 79% | 57% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 12 | 40% | 36% | 44% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 24 | 83% | 80% | 86% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 15 | 52% | 36% | 67% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 21 | 70% | 63% | 79% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 20 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 13 | 46% | 50% | 43% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 7 | 25% | 21% | 29% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 8 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 12 | 43% | 50% | 36% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 7 | 25% | 29% | 21% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 8 | 27% | 21% | 31% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 11 | 38% | 40% | 36% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 6 | 21% | 14% | 27% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 14 | 47% | 44% | 50% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 8 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 6 | 21% | 36% | 7% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 14% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 5 | 18% | 14% | 21% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 13% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 6 | 21% | 20% | 21% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 3 | 10% | 7% | 13% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 7 | 23% | 19% | 29% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 11 | 39% | 29% | 50% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 17 | 61% | 64% | 57% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 14 | 50% | 43% | 57% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 14 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 17 | 61% | 50% | 71% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 21 | 70% | 71% | 69% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 14 | 48% | 53% | 43% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 19 | 66% | 79% | 53% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 14 | 47% | 56% | 36% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 17 | 61% | 57% | 64% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 14% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 21% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 5 | 17% | 14% | 19% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 4 | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 13 | 46% | 36% | 57% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 6 | 21% | 7% | 36% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 9 | 32% | 21% | 43% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 18 | 60% | 64% | 56% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 5 | 17% | 20% | 14% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 14 | 48% | 64% | 33% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 9 | 30% | 38% | 21% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 8 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 15 | 54% | 50% | 57% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 21 | 75% | 79% | 71% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 20 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 16 | 57% | 50% | 64% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 21 | 75% | 71% | 79% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 22 | 73% | 79% | 69% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 18 | 62% | 60% | 64% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 23 | 79% | 86% | 73% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 16 | 53% | 56% | 50% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 20 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 22 | 79% | 64% | 93% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 25 | 89% | 93% | 86% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 24 | 86% | 86% | 86% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 26 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 23 | 82% | 86% | 79% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 28 | 93% | 100% | 88% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 23 | 79% | 80% | 79% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 26 | 90% | 93% | 87% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 23 | 77% | 81% | 71% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 24 | 86% | 86% | 86% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Toronto II |
28 | 26 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 2 |
Richmond Kickers |
28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
Orlando City II |
28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |
FC Tucson |
28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC |
28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph |
30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
Lansing Ignite |
29 | 27 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 8 |
Forward Madison |
29 | 29 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
North Texas |
30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 10 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves |
28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
Average goals scored and conceded: Lansing Ignite
Knowing Lansing Ignite’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the USL League One 2019 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Lansing Ignite’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 52% of Lansing Ignite games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Lansing Ignite and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 48%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in USL League One.
All of this information can help determine how Lansing Ignite’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.