 
                    Season
Country
Venue
2025/26
Belgium
Guldensporenstadion
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Waasland-Beveren | 11 | 64% | 36% | 18% | 
| 2 |   AS Eupen | 11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 
| 3 |   KV Kortrijk | 10 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 
| 4 |   Beerschot-Wilrijk | 10 | 80% | 30% | 20% | 
| 5 |   Lommel United | 11 | 55% | 55% | 36% | 
| 6 |   Patro Eisden | 10 | 100% | 70% | 50% | 
| 7 |   RFC Seraing | 11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 
| 8 |   Francs Borains | 10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 
| 9 |   RFC Liege | 11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 
| 10 |   Lierse Kempenzonen | 11 | 55% | 45% | 27% | 
| 11 |   RWDM | 10 | 60% | 50% | 20% | 
| 12 |   Olympic Charleroi | 10 | 70% | 40% | 30% | 
| 13 |   Club Brugge II | 10 | 80% | 50% | 30% | 
| 14 |   Lokeren-Temse | 10 | 100% | 80% | 70% | 
| 15 |   RSC Anderlecht II | 10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 
| 16 |   KRC Genk II | 10 | 70% | 40% | 30% | 
| 17 |   KAA Gent II | 10 | 60% | 30% | 10% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Waasland-Beveren | 11 | 55% | 27% | 18% | 
| 2 |   AS Eupen | 11 | 73% | 64% | 18% | 
| 3 |   KV Kortrijk | 10 | 60% | 20% | 0% | 
| 4 |   Beerschot-Wilrijk | 10 | 70% | 30% | 0% | 
| 5 |   Lommel United | 11 | 64% | 45% | 27% | 
| 6 |   Patro Eisden | 10 | 80% | 30% | 10% | 
| 7 |   RFC Seraing | 11 | 82% | 45% | 27% | 
| 8 |   Francs Borains | 10 | 90% | 60% | 30% | 
| 9 |   RFC Liege | 11 | 55% | 9% | 9% | 
| 10 |   Lierse Kempenzonen | 11 | 55% | 45% | 18% | 
| 11 |   RWDM | 10 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 
| 12 |   Olympic Charleroi | 10 | 80% | 60% | 30% | 
| 13 |   Club Brugge II | 10 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 
| 14 |   Lokeren-Temse | 10 | 90% | 70% | 60% | 
| 15 |   RSC Anderlecht II | 10 | 60% | 20% | 10% | 
| 16 |   KRC Genk II | 10 | 70% | 60% | 20% | 
| 17 |   KAA Gent II | 10 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Waasland-Beveren | 11 | 73% | 36% | 9% | 
| 2 |   AS Eupen | 11 | 73% | 36% | 9% | 
| 3 |   KV Kortrijk | 10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 
| 4 |   Beerschot-Wilrijk | 10 | 60% | 50% | 10% | 
| 5 |   Lommel United | 11 | 82% | 36% | 18% | 
| 6 |   Patro Eisden | 10 | 100% | 90% | 60% | 
| 7 |   RFC Seraing | 11 | 64% | 27% | 0% | 
| 8 |   Francs Borains | 10 | 80% | 10% | 10% | 
| 9 |   RFC Liege | 11 | 82% | 36% | 36% | 
| 10 |   Lierse Kempenzonen | 11 | 64% | 27% | 27% | 
| 11 |   RWDM | 10 | 40% | 10% | 0% | 
| 12 |   Olympic Charleroi | 10 | 50% | 30% | 10% | 
| 13 |   Club Brugge II | 10 | 80% | 40% | 30% | 
| 14 |   Lokeren-Temse | 10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 
| 15 |   RSC Anderlecht II | 10 | 80% | 60% | 30% | 
| 16 |   KRC Genk II | 10 | 50% | 30% | 10% | 
| 17 |   KAA Gent II | 10 | 60% | 50% | 10% | 
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of KV Kortrijk’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 20% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, KV Kortrijk’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 50% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for KV Kortrijk this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the KV Kortrijk’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.