Kunshan Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2022

China

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	56%	47%	38%	18%	12%	6%	9.06
2	Nanjing City	34	59%	53%	35%	32%	21%	12%	3%	8.94
3	Kunshan	34	62%	56%	44%	35%	21%	9%	6%	8.79
4	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	56%	41%	38%	35%	21%	18%	12%	8.7
5	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	59%	56%	41%	32%	21%	15%	3%	8.63
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	62%	53%	38%	32%	24%	9%	6%	8.62
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	53%	47%	41%	32%	29%	18%	12%	8.55
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	59%	50%	38%	26%	21%	6%	0%	8.44
9	Shenyang Urban	34	56%	41%	29%	26%	18%	18%	9%	8.37
10	Hebei Kungfu	34	53%	44%	29%	26%	24%	12%	12%	8.25
11	Nantong Zhiyun	34	56%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	8.14
12	Guangxi Baoyun	34	47%	41%	29%	26%	12%	6%	3%	8.03
13	Shanghai Jiading	34	41%	35%	32%	24%	18%	9%	3%	7.84
14	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	7.82
15	Beijing BG	34	47%	35%	18%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.65
16	Zibo Cuju	34	44%	35%	18%	15%	6%	3%	0%	7.54
17	BIT	34	38%	35%	29%	15%	12%	6%	6%	7.44
18	Qingdao Youth Island	34	35%	26%	21%	12%	3%	3%	0%	6.92

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	76%	47%	47%	41%	18%	18%	12%	9.76
2	Nanjing City	17	59%	59%	47%	41%	29%	18%	6%	9.3
3	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	71%	71%	59%	53%	12%	6%	0%	9.23
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	59%	47%	35%	29%	24%	0%	8.83
5	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	18%	18%	12%	8.82
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	12%	6%	8.77
7	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	8.77
8	Kunshan	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6%	0%	8.62
9	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	53%	29%	24%	12%	12%	6%	8.53
10	Shanghai Jiading	17	53%	41%	41%	29%	24%	6%	6%	8.51
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.12
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.76
13	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	35%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
14	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	41%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	7.53
15	Beijing BG	17	41%	35%	18%	18%	18%	12%	12%	7.47
16	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.88
17	Hebei Kungfu	17	29%	29%	18%	12%	12%	12%	12%	6.6
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	24%	18%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.36

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hebei Kungfu	17	76%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	12%	9.7
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	41%	41%	35%	12%	0%	9.12
3	Kunshan	17	71%	65%	53%	35%	18%	12%	12%	8.95
4	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	8.94
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59%	41%	35%	24%	24%	18%	12%	8.88
6	Nanjing City	17	59%	47%	24%	24%	12%	6%	0%	8.56
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	8.47
8	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	8.44
9	Guangxi Baoyun	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	12%	6%	0%	8.38
10	BIT	17	41%	41%	41%	18%	18%	6%	6%	8
11	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	6%	7.94
12	Beijing BG	17	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.82
13	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	41%	18%	12%	12%	12%	6%	7.76
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35%	35%	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	7.64
15	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	35%	35%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.47
17	Shanghai Jiading	17	29%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	7.24
18	Qingdao Jonoon	17	35%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	6.73

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	79%	68%	56%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5.41
3	Nantong Zhiyun	34	88%	71%	56%	44%	32%	18%	12%	5.29
4	Kunshan	34	82%	71%	53%	41%	35%	21%	9%	5.27
5	Nanjing City	34	85%	56%	53%	35%	26%	21%	12%	5
6	Qingdao Jonoon	34	74%	62%	59%	41%	24%	12%	6%	4.91
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	65%	62%	47%	26%	21%	21%	18%	4.61
8	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	56%	44%	41%	24%	18%	9%	4.5
9	Suzhou Dongwu	34	76%	62%	53%	24%	12%	9%	6%	4.47
10	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	76%	65%	47%	32%	12%	3%	3%	4.3
11	Guangxi Baoyun	34	65%	47%	35%	24%	18%	9%	6%	4.03
12	Hebei Kungfu	34	62%	44%	32%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.72
13	Qingdao Youth Island	34	56%	44%	35%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3.68
14	Shenyang Urban	34	68%	47%	32%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	62%	38%	24%	12%	9%	9%	6%	3.48
16	Shanghai Jiading	34	53%	35%	29%	18%	12%	6%	3%	3.39
17	Zibo Cuju	34	53%	41%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	3.18
18	Beijing BG	34	44%	32%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
19	BIT	34	47%	21%	21%	6%	6%	3%	0%	2.41

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	94%	76%	59%	47%	35%	35%	24%	6
3	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	59%	47%	35%	18%	18%	5.71
4	Qingdao Jonoon	17	82%	71%	71%	53%	35%	18%	12%	5.53
5	Kunshan	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	5.31
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	59%	53%	53%	29%	29%	18%	5.24
7	Nanjing City	17	82%	59%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.18
8	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	76%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	4.88
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	18%	18%	18%	4.56
10	Shanghai Jiading	17	59%	59%	47%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.13
11	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	47%	41%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	59%	53%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
13	Guangxi Baoyun	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.63
14	Qingdao Youth Island	17	47%	41%	35%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	59%	29%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6%	3.12
16	Hebei Kungfu	17	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.53
17	Beijing BG	17	41%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47
18	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	29%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.41
19	BIT	17	41%	24%	24%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Kunshan	17	88%	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	5.24
3	Suzhou Dongwu	17	82%	65%	53%	29%	18%	18%	12%	5.06
4	Nantong Zhiyun	17	82%	59%	53%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
5	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	65%	59%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	4.82
6	Nanjing City	17	88%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.81
7	Hebei Kungfu	17	82%	65%	53%	41%	18%	12%	6%	4.76
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	65%	53%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.65
9	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.44
10	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	12%	6%	0%	4.2
11	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	47%	35%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.12
12	Zibo Cuju	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	12%	12%	0%	4
13	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.88
14	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
15	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	76%	53%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.69
16	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
17	Shanghai Jiading	17	47%	12%	12%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.71
18	BIT	17	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.69
19	Beijing BG	17	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.47

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing BG	34	74%	71%	56%	44%	38%	26%	12%	5.18
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	82%	68%	53%	47%	26%	24%	12%	5.15
4	BIT	34	71%	62%	50%	38%	26%	15%	15%	5.03
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	82%	65%	56%	32%	18%	9%	6%	4.76
6	Shenyang Urban	34	71%	50%	44%	35%	26%	24%	12%	4.7
7	Hebei Kungfu	34	68%	44%	38%	32%	26%	21%	15%	4.53
8	Shanghai Jiading	34	76%	53%	44%	29%	15%	9%	6%	4.45
9	Zibo Cuju	34	71%	56%	47%	26%	21%	12%	6%	4.36
10	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	44%	35%	15%	9%	6%	4.12
11	Guangxi Baoyun	34	62%	53%	41%	26%	15%	9%	3%	4
12	Suzhou Dongwu	34	65%	53%	50%	26%	21%	9%	3%	3.97
13	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	59%	41%	29%	21%	18%	15%	12%	3.94
14	Nanjing City	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	9%	3%	3%	3.94
15	Kunshan	34	65%	53%	29%	9%	6%	6%	3%	3.52
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	12%	3%	0%	3.29
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	62%	44%	26%	15%	6%	3%	0%	3.24
18	Qingdao Jonoon	34	50%	32%	26%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.91
19	Nantong Zhiyun	34	47%	32%	21%	15%	6%	6%	6%	2.85

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	59%	59%	35%	29%	24%	5.71
3	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	71%	59%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.12
4	Beijing BG	17	71%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	5
5	Shenyang Urban	17	76%	59%	53%	35%	24%	24%	6%	4.94
6	BIT	17	71%	59%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
7	Shanghai Jiading	17	71%	53%	47%	35%	12%	6%	6%	4.38
8	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	59%	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.35
9	Nanjing City	17	71%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.12
10	Hebei Kungfu	17	59%	41%	35%	29%	24%	12%	6%	4.07
11	Guangxi Baoyun	17	71%	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	4.06
12	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	6%	0%	3.88
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.56
15	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	41%	29%	29%	12%	0%	0%	3.53
16	Kunshan	17	59%	53%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.31
17	Qingdao Jonoon	17	59%	35%	29%	6%	6%	6%	0%	3.24
18	Qingdao Youth Island	17	65%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.12
19	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	2.82

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing BG	17	76%	76%	65%	53%	47%	29%	6%	5.35
3	BIT	17	71%	65%	53%	41%	35%	18%	18%	5.31
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	41%	18%	6%	6%	5.19
5	Hebei Kungfu	17	76%	47%	41%	35%	29%	29%	24%	4.94
6	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	65%	59%	41%	18%	18%	12%	4.71
7	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	65%	47%	35%	18%	18%	0%	4.56
8	Shanghai Jiading	17	82%	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.53
9	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	18%	4.47
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	59%	53%	41%	24%	24%	18%	18%	4.29
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	59%	53%	53%	24%	24%	12%	6%	4.06
12	Guangxi Baoyun	17	53%	47%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
13	Nanjing City	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
14	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	35%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.71
15	Zibo Cuju	17	65%	41%	35%	12%	12%	0%	0%	3.56
16	Qingdao Youth Island	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	12%	6%	0%	3.35
17	Nantong Zhiyun	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	6%	6%	6%	2.88
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	59%	29%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	2.82
19	Qingdao Jonoon	17	41%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.53

Corner Statistics for Kunshan: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Kunshan across the 2022 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Kunshan Corner Averages (China League 1)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Kunshan provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Kunshan, based on the most up-to-date data from the China League One:

Matches involving Kunshan average 8.79 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
44.12% of matches featuring Kunshan in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Kunshan records 5.27 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 41.18% of games, Kunshan registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Kunshan concedes an average of 3.52 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Kunshan in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Kunshan, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Kunshan?

According to the data, Kunshan averages 5.27 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Kunshan matches?

In the China League One, matches involving Kunshan average 8.79 total corners per game.