Season
Country
2025/26
Belgium
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
11 | 64% | 36% | 18% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
10 | 80% | 30% | 20% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
11 | 55% | 55% | 36% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
10 | 100% | 70% | 50% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
11 | 55% | 45% | 27% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
10 | 60% | 50% | 20% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
10 | 70% | 40% | 30% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
10 | 100% | 80% | 70% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
10 | 70% | 40% | 30% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
10 | 60% | 30% | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
11 | 55% | 27% | 18% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
11 | 73% | 64% | 18% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 60% | 20% | 0% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
10 | 70% | 30% | 0% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
11 | 64% | 45% | 27% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
10 | 80% | 30% | 10% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
11 | 82% | 45% | 27% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
10 | 90% | 60% | 30% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
11 | 55% | 9% | 9% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
11 | 55% | 45% | 18% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
10 | 80% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
10 | 80% | 60% | 30% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
10 | 60% | 30% | 20% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
10 | 90% | 70% | 60% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
10 | 60% | 20% | 10% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
10 | 70% | 60% | 20% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
10 | 50% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
11 | 73% | 36% | 9% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
11 | 73% | 36% | 9% |
| 3 |
KV Kortrijk |
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% |
| 4 |
Beerschot-Wilrijk |
10 | 60% | 50% | 10% |
| 5 |
Lommel United |
11 | 82% | 36% | 18% |
| 6 |
Patro Eisden |
10 | 100% | 90% | 60% |
| 7 |
RFC Seraing |
11 | 64% | 27% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
10 | 80% | 10% | 10% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
11 | 82% | 36% | 36% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
11 | 64% | 27% | 27% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
10 | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| 12 |
Olympic Charleroi |
10 | 50% | 30% | 10% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
10 | 80% | 40% | 30% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
10 | 80% | 60% | 30% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
10 | 50% | 30% | 10% |
| 17 |
KAA Gent II |
10 | 60% | 50% | 10% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Lierse Kempenzonen’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 45% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, Lierse Kempenzonen’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 64% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Lierse Kempenzonen this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the Lierse Kempenzonen’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.