Season
Country
Stadium
2024/25
Belgium
Burgermeester Van De Wiele Stadion
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
30 | 63% | 60% | 53% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
29 | 69% | 48% | 45% |
| 3 |
Zulte-Waregem |
28 | 71% | 61% | 50% |
| 4 |
Lommel United |
28 | 54% | 39% | 29% |
| 5 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 88% | 78% | 59% |
| 6 |
RFC Seraing |
28 | 75% | 61% | 43% |
| 7 |
KMSK Deinze |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
28 | 86% | 75% | 61% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
28 | 79% | 64% | 36% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
28 | 82% | 71% | 57% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
30 | 67% | 47% | 27% |
| 12 |
RAAL La Louvière |
28 | 75% | 75% | 50% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
28 | 68% | 57% | 32% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
32 | 91% | 78% | 59% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
28 | 61% | 50% | 32% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
28 | 50% | 25% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
30 | 67% | 50% | 37% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
29 | 69% | 52% | 24% |
| 3 |
Zulte-Waregem |
28 | 68% | 21% | 7% |
| 4 |
Lommel United |
28 | 71% | 39% | 25% |
| 5 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 91% | 69% | 34% |
| 6 |
RFC Seraing |
28 | 79% | 50% | 25% |
| 7 |
KMSK Deinze |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
28 | 82% | 68% | 39% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
28 | 75% | 50% | 39% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
28 | 79% | 50% | 21% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
30 | 67% | 43% | 23% |
| 12 |
RAAL La Louvière |
28 | 93% | 50% | 29% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
28 | 71% | 32% | 18% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
32 | 78% | 69% | 50% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
28 | 68% | 39% | 21% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
28 | 54% | 25% | 4% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Waasland-Beveren |
30 | 70% | 37% | 27% |
| 2 |
AS Eupen |
29 | 76% | 34% | 21% |
| 3 |
Zulte-Waregem |
28 | 75% | 64% | 43% |
| 4 |
Lommel United |
28 | 61% | 32% | 14% |
| 5 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 78% | 53% | 31% |
| 6 |
RFC Seraing |
28 | 75% | 43% | 25% |
| 7 |
KMSK Deinze |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Francs Borains |
28 | 86% | 57% | 18% |
| 9 |
RFC Liege |
28 | 71% | 57% | 29% |
| 10 |
Lierse Kempenzonen |
28 | 75% | 64% | 46% |
| 11 |
RWDM |
30 | 67% | 37% | 17% |
| 12 |
RAAL La Louvière |
28 | 75% | 54% | 32% |
| 13 |
Club Brugge II |
28 | 89% | 43% | 11% |
| 14 |
Lokeren-Temse |
32 | 88% | 59% | 47% |
| 15 |
RSC Anderlecht II |
28 | 71% | 46% | 25% |
| 16 |
KRC Genk II |
28 | 54% | 32% | 14% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of KMSK Deinze’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2024/2025.
And on the other side of the ball, KMSK Deinze’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for KMSK Deinze this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the KMSK Deinze’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.