Hercílio Luz corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

2025

Brazil

Competition

Brazil

Catarinense 1

Brazil

Catarinense 1

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Santa Catarina	13	92 %	85 %	54 %	54 %	46 %	38 %	23 %	11.23
2	Barra do Garças	11	82 %	73 %	64 %	55 %	36 %	27 %	27 %	11.09
3	Hercílio Luz	11	91 %	73 %	64 %	55 %	45 %	45 %	9 %	10.72
4	Criciúma	11	91 %	82 %	64 %	45 %	36 %	18 %	18 %	10.64
5	Chapecoense	15	67 %	53 %	53 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	13 %	10.33
6	Avaí	15	73 %	73 %	60 %	53 %	33 %	33 %	13 %	10.13
7	Criciúma B	1	100 %	100 %	100 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	10
8	Brusque	12	75 %	67 %	67 %	42 %	33 %	8 %	0 %	9.75
9	Concórdia	11	82 %	73 %	45 %	45 %	18 %	9 %	9 %	9.72
10	Marcílio Dias	12	67 %	58 %	50 %	42 %	33 %	33 %	25 %	9.67
11	Figueirense	12	67 %	50 %	42 %	42 %	25 %	8 %	8 %	9.33
12	Caravaggio	11	64 %	55 %	36 %	27 %	18 %	18 %	9 %	8.73
13	Joinville	13	62 %	54 %	31 %	15 %	15 %	15 %	8 %	8.62

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hercílio Luz	5	80 %	80 %	80 %	80 %	80 %	80 %	20 %	11.8
2	Avaí	8	88 %	88 %	63 %	63 %	38 %	38 %	25 %	11.01
3	Barra do Garças	6	67 %	67 %	50 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	11
4	Santa Catarina	7	86 %	86 %	57 %	57 %	43 %	29 %	14 %	10.72
5	Marcílio Dias	6	83 %	67 %	50 %	50 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	10.5
6	Chapecoense	7	71 %	57 %	57 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	14 %	10.29
7	Brusque	7	86 %	71 %	71 %	43 %	43 %	14 %	0 %	10.15
8	Criciúma B	1	100 %	100 %	100 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	10
9	Criciúma	6	83 %	67 %	33 %	17 %	17 %	17 %	17 %	9.67
10	Concórdia	5	60 %	60 %	60 %	60 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	9.2
11	Figueirense	6	67 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	0 %	0 %	8.84
12	Joinville	5	80 %	60 %	20 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	8
13	Caravaggio	5	40 %	40 %	40 %	40 %	20 %	20 %	0 %	7.8

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Santa Catarina	6	100 %	83 %	50 %	50 %	50 %	50 %	33 %	11.83
2	Criciúma	5	100 %	100 %	100 %	80 %	60 %	20 %	20 %	11.8
3	Barra do Garças	5	100 %	80 %	80 %	80 %	40 %	20 %	20 %	11.2
4	Chapecoense	8	63 %	50 %	50 %	50 %	38 %	38 %	13 %	10.38
5	Concórdia	6	100 %	83 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	17 %	17 %	10.17
6	Hercílio Luz	6	100 %	67 %	50 %	33 %	17 %	17 %	0 %	9.83
7	Figueirense	6	67 %	67 %	50 %	50 %	17 %	17 %	17 %	9.83
8	Caravaggio	6	83 %	67 %	33 %	17 %	17 %	17 %	17 %	9.5
9	Brusque	5	60 %	60 %	60 %	40 %	20 %	0 %	0 %	9.2
10	Avaí	7	57 %	57 %	57 %	43 %	29 %	29 %	0 %	9.14
11	Joinville	8	50 %	50 %	38 %	25 %	25 %	25 %	13 %	9
12	Marcílio Dias	6	50 %	50 %	50 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	17 %	8.83
13	Criciúma B	0	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0 %	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Criciúma B	1	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	9
3	Criciúma	11	91%	91%	82%	64%	45%	27%	18%	6.55
4	Chapecoense	15	100%	93%	87%	60%	33%	20%	7%	6
5	Avaí	15	100%	87%	73%	40%	27%	20%	20%	5.93
6	Barra do Garças	11	100%	82%	73%	45%	18%	18%	18%	5.64
7	Hercílio Luz	11	82%	64%	64%	64%	27%	18%	9%	5.27
8	Santa Catarina	13	92%	77%	54%	38%	23%	15%	8%	5.15
9	Figueirense	12	83%	75%	58%	33%	25%	25%	17%	5.08
10	Brusque	12	92%	58%	50%	42%	25%	17%	8%	4.83
11	Marcílio Dias	12	58%	58%	42%	33%	33%	25%	8%	4.42
12	Joinville	13	77%	69%	15%	8%	8%	8%	8%	3.77
13	Concórdia	11	82%	55%	18%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3.45
14	Caravaggio	11	55%	27%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.09

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Criciúma B	1	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	9
3	Criciúma	6	100%	100%	100%	67%	50%	33%	33%	7.5
4	Marcílio Dias	6	83%	83%	67%	67%	67%	50%	17%	7
5	Avaí	8	100%	100%	88%	50%	38%	25%	25%	6.63
6	Hercílio Luz	5	80%	80%	80%	80%	40%	40%	20%	6.2
7	Barra do Garças	6	100%	83%	67%	50%	33%	33%	33%	6.17
8	Chapecoense	7	100%	86%	71%	57%	29%	29%	14%	5.86
9	Santa Catarina	7	86%	57%	57%	57%	29%	29%	14%	5.43
10	Figueirense	6	67%	67%	67%	50%	33%	33%	17%	5.17
11	Brusque	7	86%	57%	57%	57%	29%	14%	0%	4.86
12	Joinville	5	100%	100%	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4.2
13	Concórdia	5	80%	80%	40%	20%	0%	0%	0%	4
14	Caravaggio	5	40%	40%	40%	40%	0%	0%	0%	3.2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chapecoense	8	100%	100%	100%	63%	38%	13%	0%	6.13
3	Criciúma	5	80%	80%	60%	60%	40%	20%	0%	5.4
4	Avaí	7	100%	71%	57%	29%	14%	14%	14%	5.14
5	Figueirense	6	100%	83%	50%	17%	17%	17%	17%	5
6	Barra do Garças	5	100%	80%	80%	40%	0%	0%	0%	5
7	Santa Catarina	6	100%	100%	50%	17%	17%	0%	0%	4.83
8	Brusque	5	100%	60%	40%	20%	20%	20%	20%	4.8
9	Hercílio Luz	6	83%	50%	50%	50%	17%	0%	0%	4.5
10	Joinville	8	63%	50%	13%	13%	13%	13%	13%	3.5
11	Concórdia	6	83%	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
12	Caravaggio	6	67%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
13	Marcílio Dias	6	33%	33%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.83
14	Criciúma B	0	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Concórdia	11	100%	91%	82%	55%	27%	18%	18%	6.27
3	Santa Catarina	13	100%	85%	54%	38%	38%	38%	38%	6.08
4	Caravaggio	11	91%	73%	73%	55%	36%	9%	9%	5.64
5	Barra do Garças	11	91%	82%	73%	64%	27%	18%	0%	5.45
6	Hercílio Luz	11	91%	91%	73%	45%	27%	18%	0%	5.45
7	Marcílio Dias	12	83%	67%	58%	42%	25%	25%	17%	5.25
8	Brusque	12	83%	67%	58%	33%	17%	17%	8%	4.92
9	Joinville	13	77%	77%	69%	31%	23%	15%	15%	4.85
10	Chapecoense	15	67%	53%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	4.33
11	Figueirense	12	83%	58%	25%	25%	8%	8%	8%	4.25
12	Avaí	15	87%	67%	40%	27%	13%	7%	0%	4.2
13	Criciúma	11	82%	55%	36%	36%	18%	18%	0%	4.09
14	Criciúma B	1	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Hercílio Luz	5	100%	100%	60%	40%	40%	20%	0%	5.6
3	Brusque	7	86%	71%	71%	43%	14%	14%	14%	5.29
4	Santa Catarina	7	100%	71%	43%	29%	29%	29%	29%	5.29
5	Concórdia	5	100%	80%	80%	40%	20%	0%	0%	5.2
6	Barra do Garças	6	83%	67%	50%	50%	33%	17%	0%	4.83
7	Caravaggio	5	100%	60%	60%	20%	20%	0%	0%	4.6
8	Chapecoense	7	71%	57%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4.43
9	Avaí	8	88%	88%	50%	25%	13%	0%	0%	4.38
10	Joinville	5	80%	80%	60%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.8
11	Figueirense	6	83%	50%	17%	17%	0%	0%	0%	3.67
12	Marcílio Dias	6	67%	33%	33%	33%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
13	Criciúma	6	67%	17%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.17
14	Criciúma B	1	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Concórdia	6	100%	100%	83%	67%	33%	33%	33%	7.17
3	Marcílio Dias	6	100%	100%	83%	50%	50%	50%	33%	7
4	Santa Catarina	6	100%	100%	67%	50%	50%	50%	50%	7
5	Caravaggio	6	83%	83%	83%	83%	50%	17%	17%	6.5
6	Criciúma	5	100%	100%	80%	80%	40%	40%	0%	6.4
7	Barra do Garças	5	100%	100%	100%	80%	20%	20%	0%	6.2
8	Joinville	8	75%	75%	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	5.5
9	Hercílio Luz	6	83%	83%	83%	50%	17%	17%	0%	5.33
10	Figueirense	6	83%	67%	33%	33%	17%	17%	17%	4.83
11	Brusque	5	80%	60%	40%	20%	20%	20%	0%	4.4
12	Chapecoense	8	63%	50%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.25
13	Avaí	7	86%	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	4
14	Criciúma B	0	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0

Hercílio Luz corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Hercílio Luz’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Catarinense Championship:

Hercílio Luz games have an average of 10.72 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
64% of Hercílio Luz’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Hercílio Luz has an average of 5.27 corners won per game this season.
On 64% of occasions, Hercílio Luz had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Hercílio Luz usually concedes an average of 5.45 corners per match.

You can also check out Hercílio Luz’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.