Season
Country
2025
China
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
27 | 44% | 37% | 19% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
27 | 44% | 33% | 7% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
27 | 52% | 44% | 26% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
27 | 48% | 26% | 15% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
27 | 44% | 37% | 22% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
27 | 37% | 19% | 4% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
26 | 58% | 42% | 27% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
27 | 59% | 48% | 22% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
27 | 63% | 56% | 15% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
27 | 52% | 37% | 11% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
27 | 67% | 37% | 22% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
27 | 52% | 33% | 22% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
26 | 58% | 42% | 19% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
27 | 56% | 33% | 19% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
27 | 52% | 37% | 15% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
27 | 70% | 41% | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
27 | 48% | 19% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
27 | 48% | 22% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
27 | 52% | 33% | 15% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
27 | 44% | 22% | 7% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
27 | 63% | 44% | 15% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
27 | 44% | 19% | 4% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
26 | 69% | 38% | 23% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
27 | 52% | 30% | 11% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
27 | 81% | 37% | 15% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
27 | 56% | 26% | 19% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
27 | 67% | 41% | 11% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
27 | 41% | 22% | 15% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
26 | 38% | 27% | 4% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
27 | 59% | 33% | 19% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
27 | 56% | 22% | 11% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
27 | 67% | 33% | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
27 | 52% | 33% | 19% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
27 | 48% | 22% | 4% |
3 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
27 | 56% | 26% | 11% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
27 | 52% | 22% | 4% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
27 | 33% | 19% | 4% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
27 | 41% | 15% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
26 | 62% | 35% | 8% |
8 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
27 | 67% | 37% | 30% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
27 | 52% | 30% | 11% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
27 | 44% | 26% | 7% |
11 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
27 | 56% | 44% | 11% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
27 | 59% | 37% | 22% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
26 | 73% | 46% | 27% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
27 | 59% | 30% | 4% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
27 | 63% | 22% | 15% |
16 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
27 | 70% | 26% | 7% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 19% of their games played so far in the China League One 2025.
And on the other side of the ball, Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 52% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Heilongjiang Lava Spring this season in the China League 1:
You can follow the Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s card situation in Chinese Division 1 all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.