Football statistics for Hai Phong
Team Info
Season
Country
2025/26
Vietnam
Competition
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.38 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh |
9 | 67% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 10 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 10 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 9.22 |
| 5 |
Ha Noi |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 8.89 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
9 | 67% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 8.66 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.44 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
9 | 56% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 8.11 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
9 | 56% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.89 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
8 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7.75 |
| 13 |
Viettel |
8 | 75% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
9 | 56% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.45 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.88 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 11.25 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 9.6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9.8 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 5 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 10.75 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
4 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.75 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
4 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
5 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 8 |
| 13 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.66 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 9.5 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.5 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.25 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10.8 |
| 5 |
Ha Noi |
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.4 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 10 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND |
4 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.2 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.33 |
| 13 |
Viettel |
4 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.75 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
9 | 78% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
9 | 89% | 67% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
9 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5.11 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
9 | 56% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
9 | 89% | 89% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 6.11 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
8 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
9 | 100% | 89% | 67% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 5.89 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
8 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 4.5 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
9 | 89% | 56% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
9 | 67% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.22 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
5 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
4 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 7.75 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 75% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.6 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
4 | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
4 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.4 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
5 | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.25 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
4 | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
9 | 67% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 4 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
9 | 89% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
9 | 89% | 78% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.89 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 56% | 22% | 22% | 6.33 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
9 | 33% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.78 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
8 | 100% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 6.5 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
9 | 78% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
8 | 75% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
9 | 89% | 89% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 5.33 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
9 | 67% | 67% | 44% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.89 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 4.6 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
4 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 6.5 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
4 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Song Lam Nghe An |
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City |
4 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong |
5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 5.4 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong |
4 | 100% | 100% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 5.75 |
| 6 |
Da Nang |
5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 8.4 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi |
5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai |
4 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.5 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh |
4 | 100% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 11 |
Viettel |
4 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.25 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân |
3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II |
5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 14 |
Phu Dong |
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 6 |
| 15 |
PVF-CAND |
4 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
Hai Phong corner statistics
The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.
Here are the Hoa Phượng Đỏ’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Vietnam V League 1:
- Thuỷ triều đỏ games have an average of 10 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
- 44% of Hai Phong’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
- Hoa Phượng Đỏ has an average of 5.11 corners won per game this season.
- On 33% of occasions, Thuỷ triều đỏ had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
- Regarding corners given up, Hai Phong usually concedes an average of 4.89 corners per match.
You can also check out Hoa Phượng Đỏ’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.
And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.