Guangzhou Evergrande corners per game

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2024

China

Tianhe Stadium

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenyang Urban	30	87 %	77 %	60 %	47 %	37 %	27 %	17 %	10.9
2	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	77 %	60 %	50 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	17 %	10.2
3	Shanghai Jiading	30	63 %	53 %	50 %	40 %	30 %	27 %	23 %	10.2
4	Guangzhou Evergrande	30	67 %	63 %	50 %	43 %	30 %	23 %	17 %	9.79
5	Nanjing City	30	67 %	63 %	50 %	40 %	23 %	20 %	13 %	9.7
6	Yunnan Yukun	30	60 %	57 %	47 %	47 %	23 %	20 %	20 %	9.7
7	Suzhou Dongwu	30	77 %	77 %	60 %	37 %	20 %	10 %	10 %	9.67
8	Hebei Kungfu	30	73 %	63 %	57 %	40 %	23 %	17 %	10 %	9.6
9	Qingdao Red Lions	30	80 %	60 %	40 %	37 %	30 %	17 %	13 %	9.6
10	Dongguan United	30	63 %	53 %	37 %	30 %	17 %	13 %	13 %	9.51
11	Jiangxi Liansheng	30	67 %	47 %	33 %	27 %	23 %	17 %	13 %	9.1
12	Guangxi Baoyun	30	63 %	43 %	33 %	20 %	17 %	13 %	10 %	8.9
13	Yanbian Longding	30	63 %	50 %	40 %	30 %	13 %	10 %	3 %	8.87
14	Wuxi Wugou	30	50 %	43 %	37 %	23 %	17 %	7 %	7 %	8.66
15	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	60 %	50 %	43 %	33 %	17 %	3 %	3 %	8.63
16	Dalian Zhixing	30	50 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	13 %	10 %	10 %	8.6

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shenyang Urban	15	93 %	93 %	73 %	60 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	11.2
2	Yunnan Yukun	15	67 %	60 %	53 %	53 %	33 %	33 %	33 %	11.06
3	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	67 %	47 %	47 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	20 %	10.4
4	Qingdao Red Lions	15	80 %	67 %	47 %	47 %	33 %	13 %	13 %	9.73
5	Guangxi Baoyun	15	67 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	9.73
6	Hebei Kungfu	15	73 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	9.6
7	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	80 %	60 %	53 %	40 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	9.6
8	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	67 %	67 %	53 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.43
9	Dongguan United	15	67 %	60 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	9.43
10	Suzhou Dongwu	15	73 %	73 %	60 %	33 %	13 %	0 %	0 %	9.2
11	Shanghai Jiading	15	53 %	47 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	9.13
12	Wuxi Wugou	15	53 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	7 %	7 %	8.87
13	Yanbian Longding	15	73 %	47 %	47 %	33 %	13 %	13 %	0 %	8.8
14	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	53 %	40 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	8.73
15	Nanjing City	15	53 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	7 %	8.46
16	Dalian Zhixing	15	47 %	40 %	33 %	13 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.2

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Jiading	15	73 %	60 %	60 %	53 %	40 %	33 %	33 %	11.26
2	Nanjing City	15	80 %	80 %	67 %	60 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	10.94
3	Shenyang Urban	15	80 %	60 %	47 %	33 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	10.57
4	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	67 %	60 %	47 %	47 %	40 %	33 %	20 %	10.14
5	Suzhou Dongwu	15	80 %	80 %	60 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	20 %	10.13
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	87 %	73 %	53 %	33 %	20 %	20 %	13 %	10
7	Hebei Kungfu	15	73 %	67 %	67 %	47 %	33 %	20 %	7 %	9.6
8	Dongguan United	15	60 %	47 %	47 %	40 %	20 %	13 %	13 %	9.6
9	Qingdao Red Lions	15	80 %	53 %	33 %	27 %	27 %	20 %	13 %	9.46
10	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	80 %	53 %	40 %	27 %	20 %	7 %	7 %	9.46
11	Dalian Zhixing	15	53 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	13 %	13 %	9
12	Yanbian Longding	15	53 %	53 %	33 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.93
13	Wuxi Wugou	15	47 %	40 %	33 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	7 %	8.43
14	Yunnan Yukun	15	53 %	53 %	40 %	40 %	13 %	7 %	7 %	8.34
15	Guangxi Baoyun	15	60 %	40 %	27 %	13 %	7 %	0 %	0 %	8.07
16	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	40 %	40 %	33 %	27 %	20 %	0 %	0 %	7.67

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	97%	90%	83%	67%	50%	33%	13%	6.43
3	Guangzhou Evergrande	30	83%	73%	67%	47%	37%	27%	17%	5.69
4	Yunnan Yukun	30	83%	63%	47%	40%	33%	23%	17%	5.6
5	Hebei Kungfu	30	90%	73%	57%	43%	33%	20%	13%	5.37
6	Nanjing City	30	77%	70%	57%	47%	30%	17%	13%	5.2
7	Shenyang Urban	30	87%	63%	47%	37%	23%	17%	10%	5
8	Suzhou Dongwu	30	90%	73%	60%	33%	17%	7%	7%	4.97
9	Guangxi Baoyun	30	80%	70%	43%	33%	23%	7%	3%	4.77
10	Dalian Zhixing	30	77%	60%	40%	30%	27%	17%	10%	4.6
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	77%	57%	47%	27%	17%	10%	7%	4.47
12	Qingdao Red Lions	30	70%	57%	47%	40%	20%	13%	3%	4.47
13	Shanghai Jiading	30	73%	60%	33%	27%	13%	10%	10%	4.13
14	Jiangxi Liansheng	30	67%	47%	40%	30%	17%	10%	7%	4.03
15	Wuxi Wugou	30	73%	53%	37%	10%	7%	7%	7%	3.9
16	Yanbian Longding	30	63%	50%	33%	27%	17%	7%	3%	3.8
17	Dongguan United	30	63%	40%	20%	13%	7%	3%	3%	3.34

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	100%	100%	93%	80%	60%	40%	13%	7
3	Yunnan Yukun	15	93%	73%	53%	47%	40%	27%	27%	6.73
4	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	87%	87%	73%	53%	47%	33%	20%	6.57
5	Hebei Kungfu	15	93%	80%	53%	47%	40%	27%	13%	5.73
6	Shenyang Urban	15	93%	60%	47%	47%	33%	27%	13%	5.33
7	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	80%	60%	60%	33%	20%	20%	13%	5.27
8	Dalian Zhixing	15	87%	73%	47%	33%	27%	20%	13%	5.07
9	Guangxi Baoyun	15	80%	67%	33%	27%	20%	13%	7%	4.93
10	Yanbian Longding	15	73%	67%	53%	47%	33%	13%	7%	4.8
11	Suzhou Dongwu	15	93%	67%	53%	33%	20%	7%	7%	4.73
12	Nanjing City	15	73%	60%	47%	27%	20%	20%	13%	4.73
13	Qingdao Red Lions	15	80%	67%	47%	47%	20%	13%	0%	4.6
14	Dongguan United	15	73%	47%	20%	13%	13%	7%	7%	4
15	Wuxi Wugou	15	80%	60%	40%	13%	7%	7%	7%	4
16	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	60%	47%	40%	27%	20%	13%	13%	3.93
17	Shanghai Jiading	15	73%	60%	27%	20%	7%	7%	7%	3.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	93%	80%	73%	53%	40%	27%	13%	5.87
3	Nanjing City	15	80%	80%	67%	67%	40%	13%	13%	5.67
4	Suzhou Dongwu	15	87%	80%	67%	33%	13%	7%	7%	5.2
5	Hebei Kungfu	15	87%	67%	60%	40%	27%	13%	13%	5
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	80%	60%	60%	40%	27%	20%	13%	4.87
7	Shenyang Urban	15	80%	67%	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	4.64
8	Guangxi Baoyun	15	80%	73%	53%	40%	27%	0%	0%	4.6
9	Yunnan Yukun	15	73%	53%	40%	33%	27%	20%	7%	4.47
10	Shanghai Jiading	15	73%	60%	40%	33%	20%	13%	13%	4.33
11	Qingdao Red Lions	15	60%	47%	47%	33%	20%	13%	7%	4.33
12	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	73%	47%	40%	33%	13%	7%	0%	4.13
13	Dalian Zhixing	15	67%	47%	33%	27%	27%	13%	7%	4.13
14	Wuxi Wugou	15	67%	47%	33%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.79
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	73%	53%	33%	20%	13%	0%	0%	3.67
16	Yanbian Longding	15	53%	33%	13%	7%	0%	0%	0%	2.8
17	Dongguan United	15	53%	33%	20%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.73

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Dongguan United	30	93%	80%	63%	57%	37%	23%	20%	6.17
3	Shanghai Jiading	30	90%	80%	67%	47%	37%	23%	17%	6.07
4	Shenyang Urban	30	83%	80%	70%	47%	37%	23%	17%	5.9
5	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	30	90%	80%	63%	50%	37%	20%	17%	5.73
6	Qingdao Red Lions	30	83%	77%	60%	47%	30%	17%	7%	5.13
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	30	90%	67%	47%	33%	20%	17%	10%	5.07
8	Yanbian Longding	30	83%	73%	50%	27%	20%	17%	13%	5.07
9	Wuxi Wugou	30	80%	63%	43%	37%	23%	7%	3%	4.76
10	Suzhou Dongwu	30	73%	57%	53%	43%	33%	13%	7%	4.7
11	Nanjing City	30	77%	60%	40%	23%	17%	10%	7%	4.5
12	Hebei Kungfu	30	80%	50%	40%	30%	20%	7%	3%	4.23
13	Guangxi Baoyun	30	73%	50%	37%	27%	20%	17%	10%	4.13
14	Guangzhou Evergrande	30	70%	53%	37%	27%	13%	13%	7%	4.1
15	Yunnan Yukun	30	70%	53%	40%	30%	17%	17%	3%	4.1
16	Dalian Zhixing	30	77%	57%	33%	23%	10%	3%	3%	4
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	30	37%	20%	13%	3%	0%	0%	0%	2.2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shenyang Urban	15	80%	73%	73%	53%	40%	27%	20%	5.87
3	Dongguan United	15	87%	67%	60%	60%	27%	7%	7%	5.43
4	Shanghai Jiading	15	87%	80%	67%	40%	27%	13%	7%	5.2
5	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	80%	67%	60%	40%	33%	20%	13%	5.13
6	Qingdao Red Lions	15	73%	67%	67%	53%	33%	20%	13%	5.13
7	Wuxi Wugou	15	93%	73%	47%	40%	27%	7%	0%	4.87
8	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	80%	60%	40%	33%	20%	13%	7%	4.8
9	Guangxi Baoyun	15	73%	67%	47%	33%	27%	20%	20%	4.8
10	Suzhou Dongwu	15	67%	53%	47%	47%	33%	7%	7%	4.47
11	Yunnan Yukun	15	80%	60%	53%	33%	13%	13%	7%	4.33
12	Yanbian Longding	15	80%	60%	33%	13%	7%	7%	7%	4
13	Hebei Kungfu	15	87%	40%	33%	20%	13%	0%	0%	3.87
14	Nanjing City	15	60%	53%	40%	13%	13%	7%	0%	3.73
15	Dalian Zhixing	15	60%	47%	13%	7%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
16	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	47%	33%	20%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.86
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	47%	27%	27%	7%	0%	0%	0%	2.6

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Jiading	15	93%	80%	67%	53%	47%	33%	27%	6.93
3	Dongguan United	15	100%	93%	67%	53%	47%	40%	33%	6.87
4	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	15	100%	93%	67%	60%	40%	20%	20%	6.33
5	Yanbian Longding	15	87%	87%	67%	40%	33%	27%	20%	6.13
6	Shenyang Urban	15	87%	87%	67%	40%	33%	20%	13%	5.93
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	15	100%	73%	53%	33%	20%	20%	13%	5.33
8	Guangzhou Evergrande	15	93%	73%	53%	40%	27%	27%	13%	5.27
9	Nanjing City	15	93%	67%	40%	33%	20%	13%	13%	5.27
10	Qingdao Red Lions	15	93%	87%	53%	40%	27%	13%	0%	5.13
11	Suzhou Dongwu	15	80%	60%	60%	40%	33%	20%	7%	4.93
12	Dalian Zhixing	15	93%	67%	53%	40%	20%	7%	7%	4.87
13	Wuxi Wugou	15	67%	53%	40%	33%	20%	7%	7%	4.64
14	Hebei Kungfu	15	73%	60%	47%	40%	27%	13%	7%	4.6
15	Yunnan Yukun	15	60%	47%	27%	27%	20%	20%	0%	3.87
16	Guangxi Baoyun	15	73%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	0%	3.47
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	15	27%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	1.8

Guangzhou Evergrande corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Guangzhou Evergrande’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the China League 1:

Guangzhou Evergrande games have an average of 9.79 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
50% of Guangzhou Evergrande’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Guangzhou Evergrande has an average of 5.69 corners won per game this season.
On 47% of occasions, Guangzhou Evergrande had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Guangzhou Evergrande usually concedes an average of 4.1 corners per match.

You can also check out Guangzhou Evergrande’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.