Season
Country
2025
China
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenyang Urban |
21 | 75% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
18 | 64% |
| 3 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
17 | 61% |
| 4 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
16 | 57% |
| 5 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
16 | 57% |
| 6 |
Hebei Kungfu |
14 | 50% |
| 7 |
Nanjing City |
14 | 50% |
| 8 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
13 | 46% |
| 9 |
Yanbian Longding |
13 | 46% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
12 | 43% |
| 11 |
Dalian Huayi |
11 | 39% |
| 12 |
Shaanxi Union |
10 | 36% |
| 13 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
10 | 36% |
| 14 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
9 | 32% |
| 15 |
Shanghai Jiading |
9 | 32% |
| 16 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
7 | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Yanbian Longding |
11 | 79% |
| 2 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
10 | 71% |
| 3 |
Shenyang Urban |
10 | 71% |
| 4 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 64% |
| 5 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
9 | 64% |
| 6 |
Nanjing City |
8 | 57% |
| 7 |
Hebei Kungfu |
8 | 57% |
| 8 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 50% |
| 9 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 50% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
7 | 50% |
| 11 |
Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 43% |
| 12 |
Shaanxi Union |
6 | 43% |
| 13 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
6 | 43% |
| 14 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
5 | 36% |
| 15 |
Dalian Huayi |
5 | 36% |
| 16 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
4 | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shenyang Urban |
11 | 79% |
| 2 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
10 | 71% |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 64% |
| 4 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
7 | 50% |
| 5 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
6 | 43% |
| 6 |
Dalian Huayi |
6 | 43% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
6 | 43% |
| 8 |
Nanjing City |
6 | 43% |
| 9 |
Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 43% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
5 | 36% |
| 11 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
5 | 36% |
| 12 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 29% |
| 13 |
Shaanxi Union |
4 | 29% |
| 14 |
Shanghai Jiading |
3 | 21% |
| 15 |
Yanbian Longding |
2 | 14% |
| 16 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
21 | 75% |
| 2 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
19 | 67% |
| 3 |
Shanghai Jiading |
19 | 67% |
| 4 |
Shaanxi Union |
18 | 64% |
| 5 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
18 | 64% |
| 6 |
Dalian Huayi |
17 | 60% |
| 7 |
Dongguan United |
16 | 57% |
| 8 |
Yanbian Longding |
15 | 53% |
| 9 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
15 | 53% |
| 10 |
Hebei Kungfu |
14 | 50% |
| 11 |
Nanjing City |
14 | 50% |
| 12 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
12 | 42% |
| 13 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
12 | 42% |
| 14 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
11 | 39% |
| 15 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
10 | 35% |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban |
7 | 25% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
10 | 71% |
| 2 |
Dalian Huayi |
9 | 64% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
9 | 64% |
| 4 |
Shanghai Jiading |
8 | 57% |
| 5 |
Shaanxi Union |
8 | 57% |
| 6 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 57% |
| 7 |
Dongguan United |
7 | 50% |
| 8 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
7 | 50% |
| 9 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 50% |
| 10 |
Nanjing City |
6 | 42% |
| 11 |
Hebei Kungfu |
6 | 42% |
| 12 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 35% |
| 13 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 35% |
| 14 |
Shenyang Urban |
4 | 28% |
| 15 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 28% |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding |
3 | 21% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
12 | 85% |
| 2 |
Yanbian Longding |
12 | 85% |
| 3 |
Shanghai Jiading |
11 | 78% |
| 4 |
Shaanxi Union |
10 | 71% |
| 5 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
10 | 71% |
| 6 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
9 | 64% |
| 7 |
Dongguan United |
9 | 64% |
| 8 |
Nanjing City |
8 | 57% |
| 9 |
Hebei Kungfu |
8 | 57% |
| 10 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
8 | 57% |
| 11 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
8 | 57% |
| 12 |
Dalian Huayi |
8 | 57% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
7 | 50% |
| 14 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 35% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 28% |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban |
3 | 21% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Guangxi Baoyun scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the China League One 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Guangxi Baoyun is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the China League One, Guangxi Baoyun has scored before the opponent in 32% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 67%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Guangxi Baoyun’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Guangxi Baoyun being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.