Season
Country
2021/22
Italy
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Mestre |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Campodarsego |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 3 |
Delta Calcio Rovigo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Este |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Adriese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Arzignano Valchiampo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Levico |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Montebelluna |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Ambrosiana |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Cartigliano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Caldiero Terme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Cjarlins Muzane |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Luparense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Clodiense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Marignanese |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 16 |
San Martino Speme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Spinea |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Dolomiti Bellunesi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Mestre |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Campodarsego |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Delta Calcio Rovigo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Este |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Adriese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Arzignano Valchiampo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Levico |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Montebelluna |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Ambrosiana |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Cartigliano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Caldiero Terme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Cjarlins Muzane |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Luparense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Clodiense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Marignanese |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 16 |
San Martino Speme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Spinea |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Dolomiti Bellunesi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Mestre |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Campodarsego |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 3 |
Delta Calcio Rovigo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Este |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Adriese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Arzignano Valchiampo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Levico |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Montebelluna |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Ambrosiana |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
Cartigliano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Caldiero Terme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Cjarlins Muzane |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Luparense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Clodiense |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Marignanese |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
San Martino Speme |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Spinea |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Dolomiti Bellunesi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Ambrosiana’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the Serie D Group C 2021/2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Ambrosiana’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their Serie D Group C matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Ambrosiana this season in the Serie D Group C:
You can follow the Ambrosiana’s card situation in Serie D Group C all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.