 
                    Season
Country
2021/22
Italy
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Mestre | 34 | 15 | 44% | 
| 2 |   Campodarsego | 34 | 18 | 53% | 
| 3 |   Delta Calcio Rovigo | 34 | 16 | 47% | 
| 4 |   Este | 34 | 14 | 41% | 
| 5 |   Adriese | 34 | 21 | 62% | 
| 6 |   Arzignano Valchiampo | 34 | 19 | 56% | 
| 7 |   Levico | 34 | 15 | 44% | 
| 8 |   Montebelluna | 34 | 22 | 65% | 
| 9 |   Ambrosiana | 34 | 17 | 50% | 
| 10 |   Cartigliano | 34 | 16 | 47% | 
| 11 |   Caldiero Terme | 34 | 22 | 65% | 
| 12 |   Cjarlins Muzane | 34 | 19 | 56% | 
| 13 |   Luparense | 34 | 19 | 56% | 
| 14 |   Clodiense | 34 | 14 | 41% | 
| 15 |   Marignanese | 34 | 12 | 35% | 
| 16 |   San Martino Speme | 34 | 17 | 50% | 
| 17 |   Spinea | 34 | 12 | 35% | 
| 18 |   Dolomiti Bellunesi | 34 | 18 | 53% | 
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Mestre | 17 | 7 | 41% | 
| 2 |   Campodarsego | 17 | 8 | 47% | 
| 3 |   Delta Calcio Rovigo | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 4 |   Este | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 5 |   Adriese | 17 | 9 | 53% | 
| 6 |   Arzignano Valchiampo | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 7 |   Levico | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 8 |   Montebelluna | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| 9 |   Ambrosiana | 17 | 9 | 53% | 
| 10 |   Cartigliano | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 11 |   Caldiero Terme | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| 12 |   Cjarlins Muzane | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| 13 |   Luparense | 17 | 9 | 53% | 
| 14 |   Clodiense | 17 | 4 | 24% | 
| 15 |   Marignanese | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 16 |   San Martino Speme | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 17 |   Spinea | 17 | 5 | 29% | 
| 18 |   Dolomiti Bellunesi | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |   Mestre | 17 | 8 | 47% | 
| 2 |   Campodarsego | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 3 |   Delta Calcio Rovigo | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 4 |   Este | 17 | 8 | 47% | 
| 5 |   Adriese | 17 | 12 | 71% | 
| 6 |   Arzignano Valchiampo | 17 | 9 | 53% | 
| 7 |   Levico | 17 | 9 | 53% | 
| 8 |   Montebelluna | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| 9 |   Ambrosiana | 17 | 8 | 47% | 
| 10 |   Cartigliano | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 11 |   Caldiero Terme | 17 | 11 | 65% | 
| 12 |   Cjarlins Muzane | 17 | 8 | 47% | 
| 13 |   Luparense | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 14 |   Clodiense | 17 | 10 | 59% | 
| 15 |   Marignanese | 17 | 6 | 35% | 
| 16 |   San Martino Speme | 17 | 7 | 41% | 
| 17 |   Spinea | 17 | 7 | 41% | 
| 18 |   Dolomiti Bellunesi | 17 | 7 | 41% | 
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Spinea’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Serie D Group C 2021/2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Spinea in the competition:
You can also see Spinea’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.