Công An Nhân Dân Corners Per Game
Team Info
Season
Country
2025/26
Vietnam
Competition
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 10.67 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 9.78 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 57% | 50% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.35 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.06 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 64% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 8.71 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
14 | 71% | 29% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 8.64 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 73% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 8.27 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 7.94 |
| 11 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 57% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 7.93 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 54% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.84 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.6 |
| 14 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 50% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.13 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 10.75 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.33 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
7 | 86% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 9.72 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 9.63 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 9.38 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.57 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8.34 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 8.28 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 8.13 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7.76 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 63% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.63 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.14 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.71 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.34 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 10.57 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 9.38 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 9.13 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 9.01 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 8.71 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 8.63 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.38 |
| 10 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.71 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.57 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 7.13 |
| 14 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.71 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 93% | 86% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 6.07 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 93% | 73% | 47% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 5.47 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
14 | 100% | 79% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 100% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 5.14 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 4.69 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.4 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.27 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.07 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.57 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 73% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.47 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 60% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.4 |
| 14 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 64% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 6.33 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 5.43 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 4.88 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 4.86 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.57 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 83% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 15 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 5.88 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 5.71 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5.17 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.13 |
| 13 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.38 |
| 15 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 5.2 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 71% | 64% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 21% | 14% | 5 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 4.8 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 86% | 64% | 50% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 4.64 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 4.27 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 4.21 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 79% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.93 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 87% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 57% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.21 |
| 16 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.15 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.29 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 9 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 12 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 6.75 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 6.71 |
| 4 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5.38 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.86 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 4.63 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 10 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 100% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.14 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Corner Statistics for Công An Nhân Dân: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Công An Nhân Dân across the 2025/26 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Công An Nhân Dân Corner Averages (Vietnam V League 1)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Công An Nhân Dân provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Công An Nhân Dân, based on the most up-to-date data from the V.League 1:
Matches involving Công An Nhân Dân average 7.84 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
30.77% of matches featuring Công An Nhân Dân in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Công An Nhân Dân records 4.69 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 30.77% of games, Công An Nhân Dân registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Công An Nhân Dân concedes an average of 3.15 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Công An Nhân Dân in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Công An Nhân Dân, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Công An Nhân Dân?
According to the data, Công An Nhân Dân averages 4.69 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Công An Nhân Dân matches?
In the V.League 1, matches involving Công An Nhân Dân average 7.84 total corners per game.