| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Irvine Zeta
|
19 | 58% | 42% | 37% | 32% | 32% | 21% | 16% | 10.36 |
| 2 |
Savannah Clovers
|
20 | 55% | 50% | 35% | 30% | 15% | 10% | 5% | 8.88 |
| 3 |
Capo
|
16 | 50% | 44% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 8.85 |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars
|
18 | 50% | 44% | 28% | 17% | 11% | 11% | 6% | 8.46 |
| 5 |
Club De Lyon
|
17 | 47% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.42 |
| 6 |
Georgia Lions
|
19 | 47% | 37% | 21% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 8 |
| 7 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
14 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 8 |
| 8 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
19 | 42% | 37% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 7.44 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
18 | 22% | 17% | 17% | 11% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 6.65 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Michigan Stars
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 10.6 |
| 2 |
Irvine Zeta
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 9.43 |
| 3 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9.33 |
| 4 |
Capo
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 8.76 |
| 5 |
Club De Lyon
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.2 |
| 6 |
Georgia Lions
|
12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.9 |
| 7 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 7.89 |
| 8 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 7.67 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
10 | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 7 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Irvine Zeta
|
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 11.28 |
| 2 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 10 |
| 3 |
Capo
|
7 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 9 |
| 4 |
Club De Lyon
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.57 |
| 5 |
Georgia Lions
|
7 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 8.14 |
| 6 |
Michigan Stars
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.4 |
| 7 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
9 | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 7.14 |
| 8 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
8 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 6.28 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Savannah Clovers
|
20 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 5.06 |
| 3 |
Irvine Zeta
|
19 | 68% | 63% | 42% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 0% | 5 |
| 4 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
19 | 74% | 68% | 47% | 26% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 4.88 |
| 5 |
Capo
|
16 | 50% | 50% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 4.64 |
| 6 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
14 | 36% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 4.14 |
| 7 |
Club De Lyon
|
17 | 53% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.75 |
| 8 |
Georgia Lions
|
19 | 53% | 37% | 16% | 16% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 3.65 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
18 | 56% | 28% | 17% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 10 |
Michigan Stars
|
18 | 44% | 39% | 17% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
10 | 90% | 90% | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.11 |
| 3 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
6 | 50% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5 |
| 4 |
Capo
|
9 | 56% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.63 |
| 5 |
Irvine Zeta
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.43 |
| 6 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 60% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 3.78 |
| 7 |
Georgia Lions
|
12 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.6 |
| 8 |
LA Force
|
10 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 9 |
Michigan Stars
|
8 | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 10 |
Club De Lyon
|
6 | 67% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 6.5 |
| 3 |
Irvine Zeta
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 5.57 |
| 4 |
Capo
|
7 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 4.67 |
| 5 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.57 |
| 6 |
Club De Lyon
|
11 | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.14 |
| 7 |
Georgia Lions
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 3.71 |
| 8 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
8 | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 3.14 |
| 10 |
Michigan Stars
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.7 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Michigan Stars
|
18 | 72% | 67% | 44% | 39% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5.53 |
| 3 |
Irvine Zeta
|
19 | 58% | 42% | 37% | 32% | 26% | 26% | 16% | 5.36 |
| 4 |
Club De Lyon
|
17 | 65% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 5 |
Georgia Lions
|
19 | 68% | 58% | 37% | 21% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.35 |
| 6 |
Capo
|
16 | 69% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 6% | 4.21 |
| 7 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
14 | 43% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.86 |
| 8 |
Savannah Clovers
|
20 | 55% | 40% | 25% | 20% | 5% | 5% | 5% | 3.82 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
18 | 39% | 33% | 22% | 17% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 10 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
19 | 42% | 16% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 2.56 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Michigan Stars
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 7.2 |
| 3 |
Club De Lyon
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 5 |
| 4 |
Irvine Zeta
|
9 | 44% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 5 |
| 5 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 6 |
Georgia Lions
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4.3 |
| 7 |
Capo
|
9 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 8 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 50% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.11 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
10 | 30% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 10 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
10 | 50% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 2.56 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Irvine Zeta
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.71 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 50% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 4 |
Club De Lyon
|
11 | 55% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 4.43 |
| 5 |
Georgia Lions
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.43 |
| 6 |
Capo
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.33 |
| 7 |
Savannah Clovers
|
10 | 60% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 8 |
Arizona Monsoon
|
8 | 38% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 9 |
LA Force
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.14 |
| 10 |
Maryland Bobcats
|
9 | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
Corner Statistics for Capo: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Capo across the 2024 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
Capo Corner Averages (NISA Soccer)
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Capo provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Capo, based on the most up-to-date data from the NISA:
Matches involving Capo average 8.85 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
37.5% of matches featuring Capo in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Capo records 4.64 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 31.25% of games, Capo registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Capo concedes an average of 4.21 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Capo in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Corner Betting Insights
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Capo, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Frequently Asked Questions
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
What is the average number of corners for Capo?
According to the data, Capo averages 4.64 corners in their favor per match.
On average, how many corners are there in Capo matches?
In the NISA, matches involving Capo average 8.85 total corners per game.