Season
2024
Country
Brazil
Stadium
Estádio Municipal Presidente Getúlio Vargas
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | América RN | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | ASA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Brasil de Pelotas | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Moto Club MA | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Ríver | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Águia de Marabá | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
7 | CRAC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Treze | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Brasiliense | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Rio Branco | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
11 | Ipatinga | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Portuguesa RJ | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Maranhão | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Novo Hamburgo | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
17 | Anápolis | 22 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
18 | Trem | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
19 | Princesa Solimões | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Potiguar Mossoró | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Itabaiana | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | União Rondonópolis | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
23 | Altos | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Sousa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Atlético Cearense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Maringá | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Tocantinópolis | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Água Santa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | São José EC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Noroeste | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Inter de Limeira | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Cianorte | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | Nova Iguaçu | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Manaus | 17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Mixto | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Serra | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Avenida | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Concórdia AC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Barra FC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Real FC | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
46 | Cametá | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
47 | Itabuna Esporte Clube | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Petrolina Social Futebol Clube | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Patrocinense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Hercílio Luz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | América RN | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | ASA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Brasil de Pelotas | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Moto Club MA | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Ríver | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Águia de Marabá | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
7 | CRAC | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
8 | Treze | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Brasiliense | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Rio Branco | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
11 | Ipatinga | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Portuguesa RJ | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Maranhão | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Novo Hamburgo | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Anápolis | 22 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
18 | Trem | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
19 | Princesa Solimões | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Potiguar Mossoró | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Itabaiana | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | União Rondonópolis | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
23 | Altos | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Sousa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Atlético Cearense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Maringá | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Tocantinópolis | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Água Santa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | São José EC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Noroeste | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Inter de Limeira | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Cianorte | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | Nova Iguaçu | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Manaus | 17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Mixto | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Serra | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Avenida | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Concórdia AC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Barra FC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Real FC | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
46 | Cametá | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Itabuna Esporte Clube | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Petrolina Social Futebol Clube | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Patrocinense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Hercílio Luz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Avenida | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Barra FC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Manauara | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Real FC | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
5 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Sousa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Noroeste | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Treze | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Brasiliense | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Potiguar Mossoró | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Altos | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Inter de Limeira | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Água Santa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Capital | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
16 | União Rondonópolis | 14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
17 | Maranhão | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Novo Hamburgo | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Nova Iguaçu | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Serra | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Porto Velho | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | Costa Rica | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Democrata SL | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Maracanã | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Pouso Alegre | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Anápolis | 22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
27 | Itabaiana | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Trem | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Cianorte | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Rio Branco | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Princesa Solimões | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Manaus | 17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Mixto | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
37 | Santa Cruz de Natal RN | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | São Raimundo RR | 14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
39 | Concórdia AC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Retrô | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
41 | CSE | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Portuguesa RJ | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Maringá | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Tocantinópolis | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | América RN | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | ASA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Brasil de Pelotas | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Cametá | 14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
50 | Itabuna Esporte Clube | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Atlético Cearense’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the Serie D 2024.
And on the other side of the ball, Atlético Cearense’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their Serie D matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Atlético Cearense this season in the Serie D:
You can follow the Atlético Cearense’s card situation in Serie D all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.