Chions Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2024/25

Italy

Competition

Italy

Serie D Group C

Summary Matches Corners Stats

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Lavis	38	37%	29%	26%	21%	16%	16%	11%	10.71
2	Real Calepina	38	29%	26%	18%	11%	11%	11%	8%	9.87
3	Adriese	38	34%	29%	21%	16%	13%	8%	5%	9.7
4	Caravaggio	38	24%	21%	18%	16%	13%	3%	3%	9.57
5	Brusaporto	38	47%	45%	34%	21%	13%	8%	3%	9.46
6	Treviso	38	24%	18%	11%	8%	5%	3%	3%	9.36
7	Villa Valle	38	47%	42%	29%	16%	5%	3%	0%	9.26
8	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	47%	42%	24%	24%	16%	8%	3%	9.22
9	Portosummaga	38	32%	26%	21%	11%	3%	0%	0%	8.94
10	Montecchio Maggiore	38	39%	34%	21%	13%	11%	5%	3%	8.91
11	Luparense	38	34%	29%	16%	11%	11%	8%	5%	8.85
12	Dolomiti Bellunesi	38	13%	13%	13%	13%	8%	3%	0%	8.72
13	Chions	38	16%	16%	13%	8%	0%	0%	0%	8.5
14	Este	38	26%	21%	13%	11%	5%	3%	3%	8.34
15	Campodarsego	38	32%	26%	21%	16%	8%	3%	0%	8.29
16	Cjarlins Muzane	38	29%	21%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8.11
17	Brian Lignano	38	24%	16%	8%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.92
18	Calvi Noale	38	26%	21%	16%	13%	8%	5%	3%	7.9
19	Mestre	38	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5%	5%	7.5
20	Bassano Virtus	38	8%	8%	8%	5%	3%	0%	0%	7.25

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Treviso	19	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	16
2	Chions	19	11%	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	11
3	Lavis	19	42%	37%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	10.66
4	Real Calepina	19	32%	26%	21%	11%	11%	11%	11%	10
5	Brusaporto	19	58%	58%	42%	26%	21%	11%	5%	9.82
6	Caravaggio	19	16%	16%	11%	5%	5%	0%	0%	9.5
7	Portosummaga	19	42%	32%	26%	11%	5%	0%	0%	9.34
8	Cjarlins Muzane	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	9.13
9	Villa Valle	19	53%	47%	26%	16%	5%	5%	0%	9
10	Luparense	19	26%	26%	11%	11%	11%	5%	5%	8.88
11	Montecchio Maggiore	19	37%	32%	21%	16%	16%	11%	5%	8.85
12	Campodarsego	19	47%	37%	32%	21%	16%	5%	0%	8.85
13	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	47%	42%	32%	32%	21%	5%	0%	8.84
14	Adriese	19	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	8.5
15	Brian Lignano	19	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	8
16	Este	19	32%	26%	21%	16%	5%	0%	0%	7.9
17	Mestre	19	42%	37%	16%	16%	11%	11%	11%	7.71
18	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	11%	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	7.6
19	Calvi Noale	19	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	0%	7.38
20	Bassano Virtus	19	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	5

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Lavis	19	32%	21%	21%	21%	21%	21%	11%	10.76
2	Adriese	19	47%	42%	32%	26%	21%	11%	11%	10.37
3	Real Calepina	19	26%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5%	9.71
4	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	47%	42%	16%	16%	11%	11%	5%	9.7
5	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	16%	16%	16%	16%	16%	5%	0%	9.67
6	Villa Valle	19	42%	37%	32%	16%	5%	0%	0%	9.66
7	Caravaggio	19	32%	26%	26%	26%	21%	5%	5%	9.6
8	Este	19	21%	16%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	9.2
9	Montecchio Maggiore	19	42%	37%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	9
10	Brusaporto	19	37%	32%	26%	16%	5%	5%	0%	8.9
11	Luparense	19	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	5%	8.82
12	Calvi Noale	19	21%	21%	16%	16%	11%	5%	5%	8.76
13	Treviso	19	42%	32%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8.7
14	Portosummaga	19	21%	21%	16%	11%	0%	0%	0%	8.43
15	Bassano Virtus	19	16%	16%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	8
16	Brian Lignano	19	37%	26%	16%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.9
17	Chions	19	21%	21%	16%	5%	0%	0%	0%	7.88
18	Campodarsego	19	16%	16%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	7.38
19	Cjarlins Muzane	19	21%	16%	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	7.3
20	Mestre	19	21%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	0%	7.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Adriese	38	37%	37%	29%	24%	16%	5%	5%	5.35
3	Real Calepina	38	34%	32%	21%	18%	13%	8%	5%	5.27
4	Lavis	38	39%	32%	24%	18%	16%	8%	5%	5.18
5	Brusaporto	38	61%	53%	45%	24%	16%	11%	5%	5.15
6	Luparense	38	42%	39%	29%	18%	13%	8%	8%	5.11
7	Villa Valle	38	53%	42%	37%	29%	18%	5%	3%	5.04
8	Caravaggio	38	26%	24%	18%	16%	8%	3%	3%	4.71
9	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	42%	37%	26%	21%	11%	11%	11%	4.57
10	Calvi Noale	38	45%	39%	26%	13%	8%	5%	3%	4.38
11	Mestre	38	42%	29%	24%	18%	11%	5%	3%	4.32
12	Dolomiti Bellunesi	38	21%	21%	11%	11%	5%	3%	0%	4.27
13	Bassano Virtus	38	16%	11%	5%	5%	3%	3%	3%	4.25
14	Portosummaga	38	34%	29%	18%	5%	3%	3%	3%	4.19
15	Treviso	38	26%	18%	11%	5%	5%	0%	0%	4.18
16	Cjarlins Muzane	38	37%	24%	24%	11%	0%	0%	0%	4
17	Chions	38	18%	16%	11%	5%	3%	0%	0%	3.8
18	Montecchio Maggiore	38	39%	32%	21%	16%	3%	0%	0%	3.73
19	Este	38	26%	18%	11%	8%	5%	3%	0%	3.47
20	Brian Lignano	38	26%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.38
21	Campodarsego	38	34%	21%	16%	8%	5%	0%	0%	3.29

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Treviso	19	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	0%	0%	7
3	Caravaggio	19	21%	21%	16%	16%	5%	0%	0%	5.75
4	Luparense	19	42%	37%	26%	16%	16%	5%	5%	5.5
5	Real Calepina	19	42%	37%	26%	21%	16%	5%	0%	5.5
6	Brusaporto	19	79%	68%	63%	32%	21%	16%	5%	5.44
7	Lavis	19	42%	37%	26%	21%	21%	11%	5%	5.44
8	Adriese	19	21%	21%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5
9	Chions	19	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	5
10	Villa Valle	19	63%	47%	42%	26%	16%	5%	5%	4.79
11	Portosummaga	19	42%	42%	26%	11%	5%	5%	5%	4.78
12	Mestre	19	53%	32%	26%	26%	21%	11%	5%	4.5
13	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	47%	42%	32%	26%	11%	11%	11%	4.38
14	Cjarlins Muzane	19	32%	21%	21%	16%	0%	0%	0%	4.13
15	Campodarsego	19	58%	37%	26%	11%	11%	0%	0%	4
16	Brian Lignano	19	16%	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
17	Calvi Noale	19	53%	42%	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	3.92
18	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	16%	16%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.8
19	Este	19	37%	21%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.4
20	Montecchio Maggiore	19	42%	32%	21%	16%	0%	0%	0%	3.31
21	Bassano Virtus	19	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Adriese	19	53%	53%	37%	32%	21%	5%	5%	5.55
3	Villa Valle	19	42%	37%	32%	32%	21%	5%	0%	5.44
4	Calvi Noale	19	37%	37%	32%	16%	5%	5%	0%	5.13
5	Bassano Virtus	19	32%	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	5%	5
6	Real Calepina	19	26%	26%	16%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5
7	Lavis	19	37%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	4.88
8	Luparense	19	42%	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	11%	4.82
9	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	37%	32%	21%	16%	11%	11%	11%	4.8
10	Brusaporto	19	42%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5%	4.7
11	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	26%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5%	0%	4.67
12	Montecchio Maggiore	19	37%	32%	21%	16%	5%	0%	0%	4.33
13	Caravaggio	19	32%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	4.3
14	Mestre	19	32%	26%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Cjarlins Muzane	19	42%	26%	26%	5%	0%	0%	0%	3.9
16	Treviso	19	47%	32%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3.9
17	Este	19	16%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	3.6
18	Chions	19	26%	21%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.5
19	Portosummaga	19	26%	16%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
20	Brian Lignano	19	37%	32%	16%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.2
21	Campodarsego	19	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	0%	0%	2.13

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Lavis	38	39%	34%	26%	24%	13%	11%	8%	5.53
3	Treviso	38	26%	24%	21%	11%	5%	3%	3%	5.18
4	Montecchio Maggiore	38	53%	42%	34%	24%	13%	11%	11%	5.18
5	Campodarsego	38	45%	42%	34%	18%	16%	8%	5%	5
6	Este	38	32%	21%	13%	13%	13%	11%	5%	4.87
7	Caravaggio	38	29%	26%	24%	18%	8%	3%	0%	4.86
8	Portosummaga	38	34%	32%	24%	13%	8%	3%	3%	4.75
9	Chions	38	26%	21%	13%	8%	3%	0%	0%	4.7
10	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	45%	39%	32%	24%	13%	5%	3%	4.65
11	Real Calepina	38	26%	24%	16%	16%	11%	8%	3%	4.6
12	Brian Lignano	38	29%	26%	18%	5%	3%	3%	3%	4.54
13	Dolomiti Bellunesi	38	26%	21%	13%	5%	3%	3%	3%	4.45
14	Adriese	38	37%	26%	21%	16%	8%	3%	3%	4.35
15	Brusaporto	38	55%	45%	21%	16%	16%	3%	3%	4.31
16	Villa Valle	38	50%	39%	26%	13%	8%	3%	3%	4.22
17	Cjarlins Muzane	38	34%	26%	24%	18%	5%	3%	3%	4.11
18	Luparense	38	34%	26%	24%	8%	5%	0%	0%	3.74
19	Calvi Noale	38	34%	29%	16%	8%	5%	3%	0%	3.52
20	Mestre	38	37%	21%	13%	13%	3%	0%	0%	3.18
21	Bassano Virtus	38	8%	8%	3%	3%	3%	0%	0%	3

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Treviso	19	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	9
3	Chions	19	11%	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	6
4	Montecchio Maggiore	19	63%	53%	47%	26%	21%	16%	16%	5.54
5	Lavis	19	37%	32%	26%	21%	16%	11%	11%	5.22
6	Cjarlins Muzane	19	32%	26%	26%	26%	11%	5%	5%	5
7	Campodarsego	19	53%	47%	37%	21%	21%	11%	5%	4.85
8	Portosummaga	19	42%	37%	26%	11%	5%	0%	0%	4.56
9	Este	19	42%	32%	16%	16%	16%	11%	0%	4.5
10	Real Calepina	19	26%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5%	5%	4.5
11	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	4.46
12	Brusaporto	19	74%	58%	21%	16%	16%	5%	5%	4.38
13	Villa Valle	19	63%	58%	32%	16%	5%	0%	0%	4.21
14	Brian Lignano	19	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	21%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.8
16	Caravaggio	19	11%	11%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
17	Adriese	19	26%	11%	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
18	Calvi Noale	19	42%	37%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.46
19	Luparense	19	26%	21%	16%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.38
20	Mestre	19	42%	32%	21%	21%	0%	0%	0%	3.21
21	Bassano Virtus	19	5%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Lavis	19	42%	37%	26%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5.88
3	Este	19	21%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	5.6
4	Caravaggio	19	47%	42%	37%	26%	16%	5%	0%	5.3
5	Campodarsego	19	37%	37%	32%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5.25
6	Portosummaga	19	26%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5
7	Dolomiti Bellunesi	19	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5%	5
8	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	42%	42%	32%	21%	16%	0%	0%	4.9
9	Adriese	19	47%	42%	32%	26%	16%	5%	5%	4.82
10	Treviso	19	47%	42%	37%	16%	5%	0%	0%	4.8
11	Real Calepina	19	26%	21%	16%	16%	11%	11%	0%	4.71
12	Brian Lignano	19	47%	42%	26%	11%	5%	5%	5%	4.7
13	Montecchio Maggiore	19	42%	32%	21%	21%	5%	5%	5%	4.67
14	Chions	19	42%	32%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	4.38
15	Villa Valle	19	37%	21%	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.22
16	Brusaporto	19	37%	32%	21%	16%	16%	0%	0%	4.2
17	Luparense	19	42%	32%	32%	16%	11%	0%	0%	4
18	Calvi Noale	19	26%	21%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	3.63
19	Cjarlins Muzane	19	37%	26%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
20	Mestre	19	32%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3.13
21	Bassano Virtus	19	11%	11%	5%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3

Corner Statistics for Chions: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Chions across the 2024/25 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Chions Corner Averages (Serie D Group C)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Chions provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Chions, based on the most up-to-date data from the Serie D Group C:

Matches involving Chions average 8.5 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
13.16% of matches featuring Chions in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Chions records 3.8 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 5.26% of games, Chions registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Chions concedes an average of 4.7 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Chions in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Chions, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Chions?

According to the data, Chions averages 3.8 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Chions matches?

In the Serie D Group C, matches involving Chions average 8.5 total corners per game.