Tennessee and Birmingham Legion II face each other in an official match of the 2025 USL League Two season. The game takes place at on Thursday, 10/07/2025, at 01:00 (UK Time).
Our experts have prepared prediction for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II, based on in-depth study and analysis of both teams' probabilities. Our goal is to assist bettors in making profitable decisions, which is why we offer the best free predictions for today. Find more USL League Two predictions by clicking the link.
Check out our predictions below:
APWin's prediction for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II
More predictions for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II
Discover betting tips and predictions that could be profitable for this match.
How Tennessee arrives for the match
Tennessee comes into the match having played 9 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 5 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, with an average of 1.89 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 5 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses.
Tennessee's attack has scored 14 goals during this period. Out of this total, 14 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 1.56 goals per match. The season's average stands at 1.56.
The offense system of Tennessee is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 13 goals with an average of 1.44 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 13 goals conceded in 9 matches, resulting in an average of 1.44.
How Birmingham Legion II arrives for the match
On the other hand, Birmingham Legion II comes into the match having played 11 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 5 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, with an average of 1.55 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 5 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses.
Birmingham Legion II's attack has scored 13 goals during this period. Out of this total, 13 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 1.18 goals per match. The season's average stands at 1.18.
The offense system of Birmingham Legion II is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 18 goals with an average of 1.64 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 18 goals conceded in 11 matches, resulting in an average of 1.64.
Both Teams in the Standings
To provide context on how both teams are coming into this match, we present here the current campaigns of the two clubs at this moment.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green |
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | +29 | 41 | 2.16 |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 48 | 9 | +39 | 38 | 2.24 |
| 3 |
Ballard |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | +35 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge |
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 59 | 19 | +40 | 36 | 2.00 |
| 5 |
Dothan United |
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | +28 | 36 | 2.25 |
| 6 |
FC Motown II |
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | +27 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise |
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | +31 | 33 | 2.36 |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat |
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | +23 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks |
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | +20 | 33 | 2.06 |
| 10 |
Asheville City |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | +38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 11 |
Evergreen |
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 32 | 2.13 |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne |
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | +17 | 32 | 2.29 |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | +26 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 14 |
San Juan SC |
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | +22 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | +12 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 17 |
Sueno |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 18 |
Snohomish United |
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | +10 | 30 | 1.88 |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers |
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | +20 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 21 |
Almaden |
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | +15 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 22 |
Minneapolis City SC |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 23 |
Louisiana Krewe |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | +12 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 24 |
Virginia Beach United |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | +11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 25 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 26 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 27 |
Steel City |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 28 |
FC Tucson |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | +44 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Pinellas County |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 30 |
Peoria City |
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | +18 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
West Chester United II |
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
RKC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 33 |
Utah United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | +17 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 34 |
Midwest United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 35 |
SF Glens |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 36 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Black Rock FC |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 38 |
Lane United |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 39 |
Discoveries |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 20 | +6 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 40 |
Capo II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | +17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 41 |
Lexington II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX |
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 23 | 1.77 |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo |
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 44 |
City SC |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
North Carolina II |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
Annapolis Blues |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | +8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 51 |
Redlands |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | +21 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 52 |
Rochester |
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 54 |
New England SC |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 56 |
Bangers |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 57 |
Tennessee |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Project 51O |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 60 |
Akron City |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | +8 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 62 |
Oakland County |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 64 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 |
| 66 |
AMSG |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
The Villages |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 68 |
Nona |
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 69 |
Houston FC |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 70 |
Lonestar |
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 71 |
Columbus United |
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 77 |
Morris Elite |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 79 |
Midlakes United |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 80 |
Academica |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 81 |
Miami FC |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 86 |
Oly Town |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 87 |
River Light |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 88 |
Reading United |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 89 |
Bigfoot |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 91 |
Brooke House |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 |
| 92 |
Union Macomb |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 93 |
Sunflower State |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 94 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 95 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 96 |
Kalamazoo FC |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 97 |
Marin |
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers |
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 99 |
Inter Gainesville |
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 |
| 100 |
Springfield |
12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 39 | -23 | 12 | 1.00 |
| View more standings Hide | ||||||||||
Data and Statistics for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II
Check out the summary of team statistics with various relevant information to support your football prediction.
Home Team
Tennessee
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L W L L W |
1.89 |
| Home | L L W D W |
1.75 |
| Away | W L W D W |
2 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 56% | 50% | 60% |
| Goals | 3 | 3.75 | 2.4 |
| Scored | 1.56 | 2 | 1.2 |
| Conceded | 1.44 | 1.75 | 1.2 |
| Both Teams to Score | 67% | 75% | 60% |
| Without Conceding | 22% | 25% | 20% |
| Failed To Score | 11% | 0% | 20% |
| 1st to Score | 33% | 75% | 0% |
|
xG
|
1.27 | 1.39 | 0.93 |
|
xGA
|
1.66 | 1.75 | 1.37 |
Away Team
Birmingham Legion II
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W L L D L |
1.55 |
| Home | W L D L W |
1.33 |
| Away | L L W W W |
1.8 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 45% | 33% | 60% |
| Goals | 2.82 | 2.67 | 3 |
| Scored | 1.18 | 0.83 | 1.6 |
| Conceded | 1.64 | 1.83 | 1.4 |
| Both Teams to Score | 55% | 50% | 60% |
| Without Conceding | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| Failed To Score | 27% | 33% | 20% |
| 1st to Score | 33% | 33% | 20% |
|
xG
|
0.75 | 0 | 1.75 |
|
xGA
|
-0.11 | 0 | 0.89 |
You can check all the statistics for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II below.
Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II stats, standings and H2H | APWin
On APWin, you can also check all the statistics for the USL League Two.
Where to watch Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II live?
See below where to watch the match.
You can also find all the options to watch the USL League Two.
Facts and Curiosities for Tennessee vs Birmingham Legion II
The bookmakers place Tennessee as the favorite to win the match, with a 57% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
Tennessee - 1.75.
Draw - 4.54.
Birmingham Legion II - 4.93.
The last match between the teams took place on 26/06/2025, in the USL League Two, and Tennessee won the match. The final score was 0-1.
