The kick off for the match between Southern California Seahorses and Capo II will take place at 02:30 (UK time) - Monday, 06/09 - at the Biola University Stadium. This clash of the 2025 USL League Two looks very promising!
Before placing your bets on this match, check out the full analysis including predictions for Southern California Seahorses vs Capo II. We also highlight the most interesting odds and markets with a high chance of winning.
Southern California Seahorses vs Capo II - APWin Predictions
The APWin experts have identified up to three betting markets for this match based on extensive analysis. Below, you'll find the favorite to win this clash and insights into alternative markets.
Southern California Seahorses – General analysis for the match
Southern California Seahorses has played 5 matches in the USL League Two so far, with 2 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses. This results in an average of 1.4 points per match.
In the 2025 season, the team has recorded 2 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses. Southern California Seahorses's attack has scored 10 goals, 10 of them in the league, which gives an average of 2 goals per league match and 2 goals per match across the entire season.
is the team’s top scorer with 0 goals, while leads the team in assists with 0. Defensively, Southern California Seahorses has conceded 6 goals in the league (an average of 1.2) and 6 goals throughout the entire season (an average of 1.2 over 5 matches).
Capo II – General analysis for the match
In 4 USL League Two matches, Capo II has recorded 3 wins, 0 draws, and 1 losses, with an average of 2.25 points per game.
In the 2025 season, the team has 3 wins in 4 matches. The team has scored 9 goals, 9 of them in the USL League Two (an average of 2.25 goals per match), with being the team's top scorer with 0 goals and providing 0 assists.
Defensively, Capo II has conceded 6 goals in the league and 6 in the 2025 season overall, resulting in an average of 1.5 goals conceded per match.
Southern California Seahorses vs Capo II: team standings and performance
Before discussing what to expect from this clash, it’s important to understand each team’s current form. Below, check out how both teams are performing and the situation they face in the competition.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 48 | 9 | +39 | 36 | 2.40 |
| 2 |
Vermont Green |
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 37 | 8 | +29 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 3 |
FC Motown II |
12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 9 | +27 | 34 | 2.83 |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge |
15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 59 | 19 | +40 | 33 | 2.20 |
| 5 |
Ballard |
15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 42 | 7 | +35 | 33 | 2.20 |
| 6 |
Dothan United |
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 6 | +28 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 7 |
Laredo Heat |
12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 36 | 12 | +24 | 33 | 2.75 |
| 8 |
Asheville City |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | +38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 9 |
Sarasota Paradise |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 39 | 8 | +31 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 10 |
San Juan SC |
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 11 |
Ventura County Fusion |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 35 | 11 | +24 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 12 |
Des Moines Menace |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 42 | 19 | +23 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 13 |
Michigan Bucks |
13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 14 | +20 | 30 | 2.31 |
| 14 |
Evergreen |
13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 30 | 2.31 |
| 15 |
Sueno |
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 16 |
Louisiana Krewe |
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 17 |
Virginia Beach United |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | +11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 18 |
Snohomish United |
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 18 | +10 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 19 |
Fort Wayne |
12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 8 | +16 | 28 | 2.33 |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 21 |
Almaden |
14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 12 | +15 | 28 | 2.00 |
| 22 |
Little Rock Rangers |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 7 | +18 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 23 |
Steel City |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 24 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 27 | 2.25 |
| 25 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 26 |
Pinellas County |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 27 |
Minneapolis City SC |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 17 | +14 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 28 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 10 | +11 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 29 |
RKC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 30 |
Peoria City |
12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 11 | +18 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 31 |
Midwest United |
12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 10 | +17 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 32 |
Utah United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 12 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 33 |
West Chester United II |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 34 |
SF Glens |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 35 |
Sporting JAX |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 13 | +10 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 36 |
Black Rock FC |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Lane United |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 38 |
FC Tucson |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 55 | 11 | +44 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 39 |
Capo II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | +17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 40 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
13 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 24 | 1.85 |
| 41 |
Lexington II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
FC Buffalo |
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 43 |
City SC |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 44 |
North Carolina II |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
Colorado Storm |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 46 |
Albion Colorado |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 47 |
Annapolis Blues |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | +8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 48 |
SC United Bantams |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 49 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 50 |
Discoveries |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 23 | +4 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 51 |
Redlands |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | +21 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 52 |
Rochester |
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 54 |
New England SC |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 56 |
Bangers |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 57 |
Tennessee |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Project 51O |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 60 |
Akron City |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | +8 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 62 |
Oakland County |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 64 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 |
| 66 |
AMSG |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
The Villages |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 68 |
Nona |
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 69 |
Houston FC |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 70 |
Lonestar |
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 71 |
Columbus United |
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 77 |
Morris Elite |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 79 |
Midlakes United |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 80 |
Academica |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 81 |
Miami FC |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 86 |
Oly Town |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 87 |
River Light |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 88 |
Reading United |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 89 |
Bigfoot |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 91 |
Union Macomb |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 92 |
Sunflower State |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 93 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 94 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 95 |
Kalamazoo FC |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 96 |
Marin |
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 97 |
Brooke House |
11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 13 | 1.18 |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers |
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 99 |
Charlotte Eagles |
12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 12 | 1.00 |
| 100 |
Inter Gainesville |
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 |
| View more standings Hide | ||||||||||
Updated Comparison: Southern California Seahorses vs Capo II
Check out the most relevant team stats to build your prediction with more confidence.
Home Team
Southern California Seahorses
USA - USL League Two
Away Team
Capo II
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D W W L W |
2.25 |
| Home | D W |
3 |
| Away | W L W |
2 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 75% | 100% | 67% |
| Goals | 3.75 | 1 | 4.67 |
| Scored | 2.25 | 1 | 2.67 |
| Conceded | 1.5 | 0 | 2 |
| Both Teams to Score | 50% | 0% | 67% |
| Without Conceding | 25% | 100% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 25% | 0% | 33% |
| 1st to Score | 0% | 100% | 33% |
|
xG
|
1.34 | 1.68 | 1.18 |
|
xGA
|
1.34 | 1.12 | 1.46 |
Just below, you’ll find all the statistics for Southern California Seahorses and Capo II.
Southern California Seahorses vs Capo II Preview, Livescore and H2H
And don’t forget to explore all the USL League Two stats available on APWin.
Guide on where to watch the match live
If you're wondering where to watch the match, don’t worry — below we list all the available options.
If you want even more alternatives, explore all the ways to follow the USL League Two across different channels and platforms.
Trends and interesting facts about the clubs
The bookmakers list Capo II as the favorite to win the match, with an 31% chance of victory. During our analysis, the average odds were as follows:
Southern California Seahorses - 3.23.
Draw - 3.98.
Capo II - 2.44.
The last match between the teams took place on 18/05/2025, in the USL League Two, and Capo II won the match. The final score was 1-0.
