Red River and Hattiesburg face each other in an official match of the 2025 USL League Two season. The game takes place at on Wednesday, 25/06/2025, at 01:00 (UK Time).
Our experts have prepared prediction for Red River vs Hattiesburg, based on in-depth study and analysis of both teams' probabilities. Our goal is to assist bettors in making profitable decisions, which is why we offer the best free predictions for today. Find more USL League Two predictions by clicking the link.
Check out our predictions below:
APWin's prediction for Red River vs Hattiesburg
More predictions for Red River vs Hattiesburg
Discover betting tips and predictions that could be profitable for this match.
How Red River arrives for the match
Red River comes into the match having played 8 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 0 wins, 3 draws, and 5 losses, with an average of 0.38 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 0 wins, 3 draws, and 5 losses.
Red River's attack has scored 10 goals during this period. Out of this total, 10 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 1.25 goals per match. The season's average stands at 1.25.
The offense system of Red River is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 21 goals with an average of 2.63 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 21 goals conceded in 8 matches, resulting in an average of 2.63.
How Hattiesburg arrives for the match
On the other hand, Hattiesburg comes into the match having played 8 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 4 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses, with an average of 1.63 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 4 wins, 1 draws, and 3 losses.
Hattiesburg's attack has scored 11 goals during this period. Out of this total, 11 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 1.38 goals per match. The season's average stands at 1.38.
The offense system of Hattiesburg is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 9 goals with an average of 1.13 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 9 goals conceded in 8 matches, resulting in an average of 1.13.
Both Teams in the Standings
To provide context on how both teams are coming into this match, we present here the current campaigns of the two clubs at this moment.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green |
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | +29 | 41 | 2.16 |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 48 | 9 | +39 | 38 | 2.24 |
| 3 |
Ballard |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | +35 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge |
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 59 | 19 | +40 | 36 | 2.00 |
| 5 |
Dothan United |
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | +28 | 36 | 2.25 |
| 6 |
FC Motown II |
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | +27 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise |
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | +31 | 33 | 2.36 |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat |
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | +23 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks |
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | +20 | 33 | 2.06 |
| 10 |
Asheville City |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | +38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 11 |
Evergreen |
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 32 | 2.13 |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne |
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | +17 | 32 | 2.29 |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | +26 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 14 |
San Juan SC |
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | +22 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | +12 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 17 |
Sueno |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 18 |
Snohomish United |
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | +10 | 30 | 1.88 |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers |
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | +20 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 21 |
Almaden |
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | +15 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 22 |
Minneapolis City SC |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 23 |
Louisiana Krewe |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | +12 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 24 |
Virginia Beach United |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | +11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 25 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 26 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 27 |
Steel City |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 28 |
FC Tucson |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | +44 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Pinellas County |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 30 |
Peoria City |
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | +18 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
West Chester United II |
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
RKC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 33 |
Utah United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | +17 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 34 |
Midwest United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 35 |
SF Glens |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 36 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Black Rock FC |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 38 |
Lane United |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 39 |
Discoveries |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 20 | +6 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 40 |
Capo II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | +17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 41 |
Lexington II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX |
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 23 | 1.77 |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo |
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 44 |
City SC |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
North Carolina II |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
Annapolis Blues |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | +8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 51 |
Redlands |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | +21 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 52 |
Rochester |
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 54 |
New England SC |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 56 |
Bangers |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 57 |
Tennessee |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Project 51O |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 60 |
Akron City |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | +8 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 62 |
Oakland County |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 64 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 |
| 66 |
AMSG |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
The Villages |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 68 |
Nona |
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 69 |
Houston FC |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 70 |
Lonestar |
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 71 |
Columbus United |
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 77 |
Morris Elite |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 79 |
Midlakes United |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 80 |
Academica |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 81 |
Miami FC |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 86 |
Oly Town |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 87 |
River Light |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 88 |
Reading United |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 89 |
Bigfoot |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 91 |
Brooke House |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 |
| 92 |
Union Macomb |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 93 |
Sunflower State |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 94 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 95 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 96 |
Kalamazoo FC |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 97 |
Marin |
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers |
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 99 |
Inter Gainesville |
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 |
| 100 |
Springfield |
12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 39 | -23 | 12 | 1.00 |
| View more standings Hide | ||||||||||
Data and Statistics for Red River vs Hattiesburg
Check out the summary of team statistics with various relevant information to support your football prediction.
Home Team
Red River
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | L L D D L |
0.38 |
| Home | L D L D |
0.5 |
| Away | L D L L |
0.25 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Goals | 3.88 | 3 | 4.75 |
| Scored | 1.25 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Conceded | 2.63 | 2 | 3.25 |
| Both Teams to Score | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| Without Conceding | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 1st to Score | 13% | 25% | 0% |
|
xG
|
1.21 | 1.2 | 1.21 |
|
xGA
|
1.87 | 1.59 | 2.15 |
Away Team
Hattiesburg
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W L L W W |
1.63 |
| Home | W L W |
2 |
| Away | L W L D W |
1.4 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50% | 67% | 40% |
| Goals | 2.5 | 1.67 | 3 |
| Scored | 1.38 | 1 | 1.6 |
| Conceded | 1.13 | 0.67 | 1.4 |
| Both Teams to Score | 50% | 33% | 60% |
| Without Conceding | 25% | 33% | 20% |
| Failed To Score | 38% | 33% | 40% |
| 1st to Score | 13% | 33% | 20% |
|
xG
|
0.96 | 0 | 1.29 |
|
xGA
|
0.98 | 0 | 1.31 |
You can check all the statistics for Red River vs Hattiesburg below.
Red River vs Hattiesburg Preview, Livescore and H2H
On APWin, you can also check all the statistics for the USL League Two.
Where to watch Red River vs Hattiesburg live?
See below where to watch the match.
You can also find all the options to watch the USL League Two.
Facts and Curiosities for Red River vs Hattiesburg
The bookmakers place Hattiesburg as the favorite to win the match, with a 12% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
Red River - 8.04.
Draw - 5.25.
Hattiesburg - 1.49.
The last match between the teams took place on , in the , and won the match. The final score was -.
