Manhattan and Ironbound face each other on Thursday 06.26.2025, at 00:30 (UK Time), in a USL League Two 2025 match. The game will take place at Manhattan's home ground, the .
The APWin team has prepared a detailed analysis for this match, highlighting the most promising predictions, attractive odds, and betting markets with strong potential for returns.
APWin Predictions for Manhattan vs Ironbound
According to APWin's sports betting experts, there could be up to three promising betting markets for the Manhattan vs Ironbound match.
Manhattan Win
In addition to the main betting tip, our team also found alternative betting tips for the Birghton vs Liverpool match.
👉 Our prediction is: Manhattan to win
Based on our evaluations, Manhattan vs Ironbound is a matchup between two evenly matched sides. But playing at home gives Manhattan the added advantage, which is why we recommend taking Manhattan to win outright at home.
The odds offered for a Manhattan win have a lot of value, and the fact that they have that home support should help tremendously in their bid to get the victory.
👉 Our prediction is: Manhattan win or draw
The home team is usually a safe bet in the Double Chance market, and that is no different in the upcoming match. Our top tip is to bet a Manhattan win or draw against Ironbound.
Our analysis of Manhattan points to them being the superior side, which is why they have a strong chance to win the match outright. And with the added benefit of needing only a draw at home against Ironbound, their chances of cashing in the 1X Double Chance bet grow even stronger.
Manhattan's Information for the Match
Manhattan heads into the match with the following record in the USL League Two: in 7 matches, Manhattan secured 1 victories, 2 draws, and 4 losses, maintaining an average of 0.71 points per game.
Taking a broader look at Manhattan's 2025 season, the team has achieved a total of 1 victories so far.
Manhattan has been effective in the offense, scoring a total of 11 goals, of which 11 were scored in the USL League Two, resulting in an average of 1.57 goals per game.
Individually, the standout performer is , who has found the back of the net 0 times. However, he is not alone in driving the offense. has taken on the role of the team's main playmaker, leading with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, Manhattan has conceded 17 goals in the USL League Two (an average of 2.43 per game) and 17 goals throughout the entire season, with an average of 2.43 per match in the 2025 campaign.
Ironbound's Information for the Match
Ironbound comes into the game with 8 matches played so far in the USL League Two. They have secured 0 victories, 4 draws, and 4 losses, maintaining an average of 0.5 points per game in the competition.
Across all competitions in the 2025 season, the team has recorded 0 wins, 4 draws, and 4 losses.
Ironbound's attack has been highly effective, scoring 9 goals during this period. Of that total, 9 were netted in the USL League Two, with an average of 1.13 goals per game. The overall season average is 1.13.
Ironbound's offensive system is led by , the team's top scorer this season. The has found the back of the net 0 times. He is supported by the team's best assist provider, . The has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 16 goals with an average of 2 per game in the championship. For the whole season, the team conceded 16 goals in 8 matches, averaging 2 per match.
Manhattan vs Ironbound Standings
To better understand the context of this matchup, let's analyze the recent campaign of both teams USL League Two. Below, we present a complete overview of the campaigns of both clubs so far, highlighting their performances and what this may indicate for the game.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
San Juan SC |
11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 12 | +26 | 28 | 2.55 |
| 2 |
Virginia Beach United |
11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 8 | +13 | 26 | 2.36 |
| 3 |
Asheville City |
8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 1 | +34 | 24 | 3.00 |
| 4 |
Des Moines Menace |
9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 11 | +22 | 24 | 2.67 |
| 5 |
Laredo Heat |
9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 9 | +19 | 24 | 2.67 |
| 6 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 6 | +27 | 23 | 2.30 |
| 7 |
Vermont Green |
9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 2 | +16 | 23 | 2.56 |
| 8 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 23 | 2.09 |
| 9 |
Utah United |
10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 8 | +17 | 22 | 2.20 |
| 10 |
FC Motown II |
8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 8 | +15 | 22 | 2.75 |
| 11 |
Fort Wayne |
10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 8 | +11 | 22 | 2.20 |
| 12 |
Sporting JAX |
11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 11 | +9 | 22 | 2.00 |
| 13 |
Lionsbridge |
10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 37 | 13 | +24 | 21 | 2.10 |
| 14 |
Ballard |
9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 3 | +23 | 21 | 2.33 |
| 15 |
Dothan United |
9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 5 | +18 | 21 | 2.33 |
| 16 |
Evergreen |
9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 6 | +15 | 21 | 2.33 |
| 17 |
Discoveries |
9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 10 | +14 | 21 | 2.33 |
| 18 |
SF Glens |
11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 10 | +10 | 21 | 1.91 |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers |
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 5 | +17 | 20 | 2.22 |
| 20 |
Capo II |
10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 12 | +16 | 20 | 2.00 |
| 21 |
West Chester United II |
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 11 | +9 | 20 | 2.22 |
| 22 |
Lexington II |
10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 20 | 2.00 |
| 23 |
Pinellas County |
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 9 | +16 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 24 |
Midwest United |
10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 10 | +13 | 19 | 1.90 |
| 25 |
Steel City |
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 9 | +11 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 26 |
AHFC Royals |
10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 12 | +11 | 19 | 1.90 |
| 27 |
New England SC |
10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 19 | 1.90 |
| 28 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 8 | +10 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 29 |
Louisiana Krewe |
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 30 |
Sarasota Paradise |
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 19 | 2.38 |
| 31 |
Denton Diablos |
10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 19 | 1.90 |
| 32 |
Ventura County Fusion |
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 3 | +19 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 33 |
RKC |
9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 18 | 2.00 |
| 34 |
Peoria City |
8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 8 | +11 | 18 | 2.25 |
| 35 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 18 | 2.25 |
| 36 |
Ann Arbor |
10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 37 |
Redlands |
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 11 | +18 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 38 |
Minneapolis City SC |
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 11 | +11 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 39 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 40 |
Flatirons Rush |
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 17 | 2.13 |
| 41 |
Snohomish United |
9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 17 | 1.89 |
| 42 |
Tennessee |
9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 17 | 1.89 |
| 43 |
FC Tucson |
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 49 | 9 | +40 | 16 | 2.00 |
| 44 |
Lane United |
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 16 | 1.78 |
| 45 |
Almaden |
10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 16 | 1.60 |
| 46 |
Sueno |
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 16 | 2.29 |
| 47 |
FC Buffalo |
9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 | 1.78 |
| 48 |
Michigan Bucks |
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 5 | +10 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 49 |
Annapolis Blues |
8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 15 | 1.88 |
| 50 |
Rochester |
8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 15 | 1.88 |
| 51 |
Black Rock FC |
9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 15 | 1.67 |
| 52 |
San Francisco City |
10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 15 | 1.50 |
| 53 |
Lonestar |
8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 18 | +1 | 15 | 1.88 |
| 54 |
Bangers |
11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 15 | 1.36 |
| 55 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 56 |
Columbus United |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 9 | +5 | 14 | 1.56 |
| 57 |
Brazos Valley |
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 14 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Real Central New Jersey |
10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 14 | +5 | 14 | 1.40 |
| 59 |
Project 51O |
10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 14 | 1.40 |
| 60 |
Birmingham Legion II |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 14 | 1.56 |
| 61 |
City SC |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 7 | +17 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 62 |
SC United Bantams |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 63 |
Oakland County |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 64 |
Hattiesburg |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 65 |
Corpus Christi |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 66 |
AC Connecticut |
10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 | 1.30 |
| 67 |
Sunflower State |
9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 19 | -1 | 13 | 1.44 |
| 68 |
Brooke House |
10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 13 | 1.30 |
| 69 |
Northern Indiana |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 70 |
Kalamazoo FC |
9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 13 | 1.44 |
| 71 |
AMSG |
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 27 | 13 | +14 | 12 | 1.50 |
| 72 |
Akron City |
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 12 | 1.50 |
| 73 |
Nona |
8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 12 | 1.50 |
| 74 |
The Villages |
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 12 | 1.50 |
| 75 |
Toledo Villa |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 76 |
New Jersey Copa FC |
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 11 | 1.22 |
| 77 |
FC Boston Bolts |
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 11 | 1.22 |
| 78 |
Academica |
9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 11 | 1.22 |
| 79 |
Miami FC |
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 80 |
West Virginia Chaos |
8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 10 | 1.25 |
| 81 |
Colorado Storm |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -2 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 83 |
Charlottesville Blues |
10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 10 | 1.00 |
| 84 |
Bigfoot |
9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 20 | -2 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 85 |
Charlotte Eagles |
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 86 |
Union Macomb |
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 87 |
Midlakes United |
9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 20 | -6 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 88 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 89 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 10 | 1.00 |
| 90 |
North Carolina II |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 91 |
Houston FC |
8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 | 1.13 |
| 92 |
Inter Gainesville |
8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 9 | 1.13 |
| 93 |
Staten Island Athletic |
7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 94 |
Tobacco Road FC |
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 9 | 1.00 |
| 95 |
River Light |
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 9 | 1.00 |
| 96 |
Oly Town |
10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 9 | 0.90 |
| 97 |
Santafé Wanderers |
9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 25 | -9 | 9 | 1.00 |
| 98 |
Springfield |
9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 31 | -18 | 9 | 1.00 |
| 99 |
Southern California Seahorses |
9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 8 | 0.89 |
| 100 |
GFI |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 8 | 1.14 |
| View more standings | ||||||||||
Data for Manhattan vs Ironbound: Complete Statistics
You can base your football prediction on the detailed information of the teams' statistics below.
Home Team
Manhattan
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D L L W L |
0.71 |
| Home | L L |
0 |
| Away | D L W L D |
1 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 14% | 0% | 20% |
| Goals | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Scored | 1.57 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Conceded | 2.43 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Both Teams to Score | 71% | 50% | 80% |
| Without Conceding | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 29% | 50% | 20% |
| 1st to Score | 29% | 0% | 40% |
|
xG
|
1.58 | 0 | 1.83 |
|
xGA
|
1.75 | 0 | 2 |
Away Team
Ironbound
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D D L D D |
0.5 |
| Home | D L D L |
0.5 |
| Away | D D L L |
0.5 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Goals | 3.13 | 3.25 | 3 |
| Scored | 1.13 | 1.25 | 1 |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Both Teams to Score | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| Without Conceding | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Failed To Score | 38% | 25% | 50% |
| 1st to Score | 29% | 25% | 0% |
|
xG
|
1.75 | 1.63 | 2 |
|
xGA
|
2.15 | 1.99 | 2.48 |
See below all the details of the clash between Manhattan vs Ironbound.
Manhattan vs Ironbound Preview, Livescore and H2H
At APWin, you can also find the complete statistical analysis of the USL League Two.
How to Watch Manhattan vs Ironbound Live on TV and Online?
To make it easier for you to watch the match and place live bets, APWin has gathered all the information about where to watch the game, including TV channels and streaming platforms.
Check out other alternatives to follow the USL League Two without missing a single moment!
Facts and Trends for the Clash
The bookmakers place Manhattan as the favorite to win the match, with a 59% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
Manhattan to win - 1.7.
Draw - 4.4.
Ironbound to win - 4.35.
The last match between the teams took place on 23/05/2024, in the USL League Two, and Manhattan won the match. The final score was 3-2.
