Little Rock Rangers and Hattiesburg face each other on Sunday 06.15.2025, at 01:00 (UK Time), in a USL League Two 2025 match. The game will take place at Little Rock Rangers's home ground, the .
The APWin team has prepared a detailed analysis for this match, highlighting the most promising predictions, attractive odds, and betting markets with strong potential for returns.
APWin Predictions for Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg
According to APWin's sports betting experts, there could be up to three promising betting markets for the Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg match.
Little Rock Rangers Clean Sheet: No
In addition to the main betting tip, our team also found alternative betting tips for the Birghton vs Liverpool match.
👉 Our prediction is: Little Rock Rangers to win the 1st half
While the half-time market is not a particularly popular betting market, it does provide a good deal of value. And this is true for Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg, where we have Little Rock Rangers to win the first half as our best bet.
Little Rock Rangers has been quite a fast starter at home as they quickly put the pressure on their visitors in the opening minutes. That strategy should lead to a Little Rock Rangers taking an advantage into half-time.
Little Rock Rangers's Information for the Match
Little Rock Rangers heads into the match with the following record in the USL League Two: in 6 matches, Little Rock Rangers secured 4 victories, 1 draws, and 1 losses, maintaining an average of 2.17 points per game.
Taking a broader look at Little Rock Rangers's 2025 season, the team has achieved a total of 4 victories so far.
Little Rock Rangers has been effective in the offense, scoring a total of 16 goals, of which 16 were scored in the USL League Two, resulting in an average of 2.67 goals per game.
Individually, the standout performer is , who has found the back of the net 0 times. However, he is not alone in driving the offense. has taken on the role of the team's main playmaker, leading with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, Little Rock Rangers has conceded 3 goals in the USL League Two (an average of 0.5 per game) and 3 goals throughout the entire season, with an average of 0.5 per match in the 2025 campaign.
Hattiesburg's Information for the Match
Hattiesburg comes into the game with 5 matches played so far in the USL League Two. They have secured 3 victories, 1 draws, and 1 losses, maintaining an average of 2 points per game in the competition.
Across all competitions in the 2025 season, the team has recorded 3 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses.
Hattiesburg's attack has been highly effective, scoring 9 goals during this period. Of that total, 9 were netted in the USL League Two, with an average of 1.8 goals per game. The overall season average is 1.8.
Hattiesburg's offensive system is led by , the team's top scorer this season. The has found the back of the net 0 times. He is supported by the team's best assist provider, . The has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 6 goals with an average of 1.2 per game in the championship. For the whole season, the team conceded 6 goals in 5 matches, averaging 1.2 per match.
Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg Standings
To better understand the context of this matchup, let's analyze the recent campaign of both teams USL League Two. Below, we present a complete overview of the campaigns of both clubs so far, highlighting their performances and what this may indicate for the game.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
San Juan SC |
9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 9 | +22 | 24 | 2.67 |
| 2 |
Laredo Heat |
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | +13 | 18 | 3.00 |
| 3 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 2 | +12 | 18 | 2.57 |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 8 | +24 | 17 | 2.43 |
| 5 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 4 | +22 | 17 | 2.43 |
| 6 |
Lexington II |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 17 | 2.43 |
| 7 |
Vermont Green |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | +13 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 8 |
Ballard |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | +12 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 9 |
Fort Wayne |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 16 | 2.67 |
| 10 |
Capo II |
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 16 | 2.29 |
| 11 |
Snohomish United |
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 16 | 2.29 |
| 12 |
Asheville City |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 15 | 3.00 |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 9 | +15 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 14 |
Midwest United |
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 6 | +12 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 15 |
Peoria City |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 16 |
Evergreen |
7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 5 | +10 | 15 | 2.14 |
| 17 |
Rochester |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 18 |
Flatirons Rush |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 15 | 2.50 |
| 19 |
West Chester United II |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 20 |
SF Glens |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 21 |
Tennessee |
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 14 | 2.33 |
| 22 |
Virginia Beach United |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 14 | 2.00 |
| 23 |
Little Rock Rangers |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 3 | +13 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 24 |
Pinellas County |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | +13 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 25 |
FC Motown II |
5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 13 | 2.60 |
| 26 |
Almaden |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 13 | 1.63 |
| 27 |
Steel City |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 28 |
Utah United |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
AHFC Royals |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 30 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 31 |
Sarasota Paradise |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 32 |
Sporting JAX |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 13 | 1.86 |
| 33 |
Birmingham Legion II |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 13 | 2.17 |
| 34 |
FC Tucson |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 5 | +26 | 12 | 2.40 |
| 35 |
Redlands |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 12 | 2.40 |
| 36 |
Discoveries |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | +9 | 12 | 2.40 |
| 37 |
Dothan United |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | +8 | 12 | 2.40 |
| 38 |
Michigan Bucks |
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 39 |
Annapolis Blues |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 12 | 2.40 |
| 40 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 12 | 2.00 |
| 41 |
Oakland County |
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 42 |
AC Connecticut |
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 12 | 1.71 |
| 43 |
RKC |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 11 | 1.83 |
| 44 |
Lane United |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 11 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
San Francisco City |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 46 |
Ann Arbor |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 47 |
Brooke House |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
Black Rock FC |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 11 | 1.57 |
| 49 |
City SC |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | +13 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 50 |
New England SC |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 51 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 52 |
FC Buffalo |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 53 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 54 |
Hattiesburg |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 55 |
Sueno |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 56 |
Academica |
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 57 |
Corpus Christi |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 58 |
Denton Diablos |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 |
| 59 |
Union Macomb |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | 1.43 |
| 60 |
Northern Indiana |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 | 2.00 |
| 61 |
Ventura County Fusion |
4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | +15 | 9 | 2.25 |
| 62 |
Nona |
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 9 | 1.80 |
| 63 |
Lonestar |
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 9 | 1.80 |
| 64 |
Louisiana Krewe |
4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 9 | 2.25 |
| 65 |
Inter Gainesville |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 9 | 1.50 |
| 66 |
Sunflower State |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
Project 51O |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 68 |
Springfield |
7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 9 | 1.29 |
| 69 |
Minneapolis City SC |
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 8 | 1.60 |
| 70 |
Columbus United |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 71 |
Real Central New Jersey |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 72 |
Toledo Villa |
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 8 | 1.60 |
| 73 |
Tobacco Road FC |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 74 |
Houston FC |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 75 |
GFI |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 76 |
River Light |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 77 |
AMSG |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 78 |
Kings Hammer |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 | 1.33 |
| 79 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 80 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 | 1.00 |
| 81 |
Midlakes United |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 | 1.14 |
| 82 |
New Jersey Copa FC |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 7 | 1.40 |
| 83 |
SC United Bantams |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 | 1.40 |
| 84 |
Brazos Valley |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
| 85 |
Charlotte Eagles |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
| 86 |
Lehigh Valley Utd. Sonic |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
| 87 |
Southern California Seahorses |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 7 | 1.00 |
| 88 |
Bigfoot |
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 |
| 89 |
Westchester Flames |
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 | 1.17 |
| 90 |
Weston FC |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 7 | 1.00 |
| 91 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
| 92 |
North Carolina II |
5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
| 93 |
Miami FC |
5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
| 94 |
Colorado Storm |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 | 1.50 |
| 95 |
Morris Elite |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 | 1.50 |
| 96 |
Staten Island Athletic |
5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 | 1.20 |
| 97 |
St. Louis Ambush |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 | 0.86 |
| 98 |
Southern Soccer Academy |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 6 | 0.86 |
| 99 |
Kalamazoo FC |
6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 6 | 1.00 |
| 100 |
Blackwatch Rush |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 | 0.86 |
| View more standings | ||||||||||
Data for Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg: Complete Statistics
You can base your football prediction on the detailed information of the teams' statistics below.
Home Team
Little Rock Rangers
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W L W D W |
2.17 |
| Home | W W W |
3 |
| Away | L D W |
1.33 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 67% | 100% | 33% |
| Goals | 3.17 | 4.67 | 1.67 |
| Scored | 2.67 | 4.33 | 1 |
| Conceded | 0.5 | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| Both Teams to Score | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Without Conceding | 50% | 67% | 33% |
| Failed To Score | 17% | 0% | 33% |
| 1st to Score | 50% | 100% | 0% |
|
xG
|
1.69 | 1.93 | 1.2 |
|
xGA
|
0.59 | 0.5 | 0.78 |
Away Team
Hattiesburg
USA - USL League Two
See below all the details of the clash between Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg.
Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg Preview, Livescore and H2H
At APWin, you can also find the complete statistical analysis of the USL League Two.
How to Watch Little Rock Rangers vs Hattiesburg Live on TV and Online?
To make it easier for you to watch the match and place live bets, APWin has gathered all the information about where to watch the game, including TV channels and streaming platforms.
Check out other alternatives to follow the USL League Two without missing a single moment!
Facts and Trends for the Clash
The bookmakers place Little Rock Rangers as the favorite to win the match, with a 69% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
Little Rock Rangers to win - 1.45.
Draw - 5.75.
Hattiesburg to win - 8.68.
The last game between the teams took place on 14/07/2024, in the USL League Two, and the match ended in a 1-1 draw.
