FC Tucson and City SC face each other on Sunday 06.29.2025, at 02:00 (UK Time), in a USL League Two 2025 match. The game will take place at FC Tucson's home ground, the Kino North Stadium.
The APWin team has prepared a detailed analysis for this match, highlighting the most promising predictions, attractive odds, and betting markets with strong potential for returns.
APWin Predictions for FC Tucson vs City SC
According to APWin's sports betting experts, there could be up to three promising betting markets for the FC Tucson vs City SC match.
In addition to the main betting tip, our team also found alternative betting tips for the Birghton vs Liverpool match.
FC Tucson's Information for the Match
FC Tucson heads into the match with the following record in the USL League Two: in 8 matches, FC Tucson secured 5 victories, 1 draws, and 2 losses, maintaining an average of 2 points per game.
Taking a broader look at FC Tucson's 2025 season, the team has achieved a total of 5 victories so far.
FC Tucson has been effective in the offense, scoring a total of 49 goals, of which 49 were scored in the USL League Two, resulting in an average of 6.13 goals per game.
Individually, the standout performer is , who has found the back of the net 0 times. However, he is not alone in driving the offense. has taken on the role of the team's main playmaker, leading with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, FC Tucson has conceded 9 goals in the USL League Two (an average of 1.13 per game) and 9 goals throughout the entire season, with an average of 1.13 per match in the 2025 campaign.
City SC's Information for the Match
City SC comes into the game with 8 matches played so far in the USL League Two. They have secured 5 victories, 1 draws, and 2 losses, maintaining an average of 2 points per game in the competition.
Across all competitions in the 2025 season, the team has recorded 5 wins, 1 draws, and 2 losses.
City SC's attack has been highly effective, scoring 25 goals during this period. Of that total, 25 were netted in the USL League Two, with an average of 3.13 goals per game. The overall season average is 3.13.
City SC's offensive system is led by , the team's top scorer this season. The has found the back of the net 0 times. He is supported by the team's best assist provider, . The has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 7 goals with an average of 0.88 per game in the championship. For the whole season, the team conceded 7 goals in 8 matches, averaging 0.88 per match.
FC Tucson vs City SC Standings
To better understand the context of this matchup, let's analyze the recent campaign of both teams USL League Two. Below, we present a complete overview of the campaigns of both clubs so far, highlighting their performances and what this may indicate for the game.
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green |
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | +29 | 41 | 2.16 |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers |
17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 48 | 9 | +39 | 38 | 2.24 |
| 3 |
Lionsbridge |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 59 | 19 | +40 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 4 |
Ballard |
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | +35 | 37 | 1.95 |
| 5 |
Dothan United |
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | +28 | 36 | 2.25 |
| 6 |
FC Motown II |
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | +27 | 36 | 2.57 |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise |
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | +31 | 33 | 2.36 |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat |
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | +23 | 33 | 2.54 |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks |
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | +20 | 33 | 2.06 |
| 10 |
Asheville City |
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | +38 | 32 | 2.46 |
| 11 |
Evergreen |
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 32 | 2.13 |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne |
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | +17 | 32 | 2.29 |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace |
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | +26 | 31 | 2.38 |
| 14 |
San Juan SC |
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | +25 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | +22 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United |
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | +12 | 31 | 2.07 |
| 17 |
Sueno |
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | +15 | 30 | 2.14 |
| 18 |
Snohomish United |
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | +10 | 30 | 1.88 |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers |
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | +20 | 29 | 2.23 |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 21 |
Almaden |
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | +15 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 22 |
Minneapolis City SC |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | +14 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 23 |
Louisiana Krewe |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | +12 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 24 |
Virginia Beach United |
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | +11 | 29 | 2.07 |
| 25 |
Hudson Valley Hammers |
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 29 | 1.93 |
| 26 |
North Carolina Fusion U23 |
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 28 | 2.15 |
| 27 |
Steel City |
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 27 | 2.08 |
| 28 |
FC Tucson |
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | +44 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 29 |
Pinellas County |
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | +22 | 26 | 2.17 |
| 30 |
Peoria City |
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | +18 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 31 |
West Chester United II |
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | +13 | 26 | 2.00 |
| 32 |
Discoveries |
14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 20 | +6 | 26 | 1.86 |
| 33 |
RKC |
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | +20 | 25 | 2.08 |
| 34 |
Utah United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | +17 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 35 |
Midwest United |
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | +16 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 36 |
SF Glens |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 37 |
Ocean City Nor'easters |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 38 |
Black Rock FC |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 39 |
Lane United |
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 25 | 1.79 |
| 40 |
Capo II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | +17 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 41 |
Lexington II |
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 24 | 2.00 |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX |
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 23 | 1.77 |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo |
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | +5 | 23 | 1.92 |
| 44 |
City SC |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 45 |
North Carolina II |
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | +11 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 48 |
Annapolis Blues |
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | +8 | 22 | 1.69 |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams |
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut |
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 22 | 1.57 |
| 51 |
Redlands |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | +21 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 52 |
Rochester |
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | +7 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 54 |
New England SC |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 56 |
Bangers |
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 57 |
Tennessee |
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 |
| 58 |
Project 51O |
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | +10 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 60 |
Akron City |
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | +8 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues |
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 20 | 1.43 |
| 62 |
Oakland County |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.67 |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 20 | 1.82 |
| 64 |
San Francisco City |
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 19 | 1.36 |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos |
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 |
| 66 |
AMSG |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | +13 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 67 |
The Villages |
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 68 |
Nona |
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 18 | 1.80 |
| 69 |
Houston FC |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 18 | 1.50 |
| 70 |
Lonestar |
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 |
| 71 |
Columbus United |
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | +3 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms |
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 77 |
Morris Elite |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II |
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 |
| 79 |
Midlakes United |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 80 |
Academica |
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 |
| 81 |
Miami FC |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | +2 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus |
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction |
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 86 |
Oly Town |
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 87 |
River Light |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 88 |
Reading United |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 89 |
Bigfoot |
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey |
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | +3 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 91 |
Brooke House |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 |
| 92 |
Union Macomb |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 93 |
Sunflower State |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 94 |
Kings Hammer Sun City |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 95 |
FC Boston Bolts |
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 96 |
Kalamazoo FC |
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 97 |
Marin |
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers |
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 |
| 99 |
Inter Gainesville |
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 |
| 100 |
Springfield |
12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 39 | -23 | 12 | 1.00 |
| View more standings Hide | ||||||||||
Data for FC Tucson vs City SC: Complete Statistics
You can base your football prediction on the detailed information of the teams' statistics below.
Home Team
FC Tucson
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | D L W L W |
2 |
| Home | W W W |
3 |
| Away | D L W L W |
1.4 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 63% | 100% | 40% |
| Goals | 7.25 | 8.67 | 6.4 |
| Scored | 6.13 | 8.33 | 4.8 |
| Conceded | 1.13 | 0.33 | 1.6 |
| Both Teams to Score | 50% | 33% | 60% |
| Without Conceding | 38% | 67% | 20% |
| Failed To Score | 13% | 0% | 20% |
| 1st to Score | 63% | 100% | 40% |
|
xG
|
2.09 | 2.53 | 1.8 |
|
xGA
|
1.22 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Away Team
City SC
USA - USL League Two
| Form | Last 5 | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | W W L W W |
2 |
| Home | W W L W |
2.25 |
| Away | W W L D |
1.75 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| Goals | 4 | 5.25 | 2.75 |
| Scored | 3.13 | 4.25 | 2 |
| Conceded | 0.88 | 1 | 0.75 |
| Both Teams to Score | 63% | 75% | 50% |
| Without Conceding | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Failed To Score | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 1st to Score | 63% | 75% | 50% |
|
xG
|
1.59 | 1.65 | 1.42 |
|
xGA
|
1.05 | 1.05 | 1.06 |
See below all the details of the clash between FC Tucson vs City SC.
FC Tucson vs City SC Preview, Livescore and H2H
At APWin, you can also find the complete statistical analysis of the USL League Two.
How to Watch FC Tucson vs City SC Live on TV and Online?
To make it easier for you to watch the match and place live bets, APWin has gathered all the information about where to watch the game, including TV channels and streaming platforms.
Check out other alternatives to follow the USL League Two without missing a single moment!
Facts and Trends for the Clash
The bookmakers place FC Tucson as the favorite to win the match, with a 41% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
FC Tucson to win - 2.42.
Draw - 4.29.
City SC to win - 3.2.
The last match between the teams took place on 13/06/2025, in the USL League Two, and City SC won the match. The final score was 2-1.
