City SC and FC Tucson face each other in an official match of the 2025 USL League Two season. The game takes place at on Friday, 13/06/2025, at 02:00 (UK Time).
Our experts have prepared prediction for City SC vs FC Tucson, based on in-depth study and analysis of both teams' probabilities. Our goal is to assist bettors in making profitable decisions, which is why we offer the best free predictions for today. Find more USL League Two predictions by clicking the link.
Check out our predictions below:
APWin's prediction for City SC vs FC Tucson
Over 2.5 Goals
More predictions for City SC vs FC Tucson
Discover betting tips and predictions that could be profitable for this match.
How City SC arrives for the match
City SC comes into the match having played 3 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 1 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses, with an average of 1.33 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 1 wins, 1 draws, and 1 losses.
City SC's attack has scored 12 goals during this period. Out of this total, 12 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 4 goals per match. The season's average stands at 4.
The offense system of City SC is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 3 goals with an average of 1 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 3 goals conceded in 3 matches, resulting in an average of 1.
How FC Tucson arrives for the match
On the other hand, FC Tucson comes into the match having played 4 games in the USL League Two so far. They have recorded 4 wins, 0 draws, and 0 losses, with an average of 3 points per game in the tournament.
In the 2025 season across all competitions, the team has achieved 4 wins, 0 draws, and 0 losses.
FC Tucson's attack has scored 30 goals during this period. Out of this total, 30 goals were scored in the USL League Two, averaging 7.5 goals per match. The season's average stands at 7.5.
The offense system of FC Tucson is led by as the top scorer of the season. The has scored 0 goals. He is supported by the season's best assistant, , who has contributed with 0 assists.
On the defensive side, the team has conceded 3 goals with an average of 0.75 in the league. In all competitions, the current numbers are 3 goals conceded in 4 matches, resulting in an average of 0.75.
Both Teams in the Standings
To provide context on how both teams are coming into this match, we present here the current campaigns of the two clubs at this moment.
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() San Juan SC |
9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 9 | +22 | 24 | 2.67 |
2 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 4 | +13 | 18 | 3.00 |
3 |
![]() Fort Lauderdale United |
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 2 | +12 | 18 | 2.57 |
4 |
![]() Lionsbridge |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 8 | +24 | 17 | 2.43 |
5 |
![]() Western Mass Pioneers |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 4 | +22 | 17 | 2.43 |
6 |
![]() Lexington II |
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 17 | 2.43 |
7 |
![]() Vermont Green |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 2 | +13 | 16 | 2.67 |
8 |
![]() Ballard |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 3 | +12 | 16 | 2.67 |
9 |
![]() Fort Wayne |
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 16 | 2.67 |
10 |
![]() Capo II |
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 16 | 2.29 |
11 |
![]() Snohomish United |
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 16 | 2.29 |
12 |
![]() Asheville City |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | +27 | 15 | 3.00 |
13 |
![]() Des Moines Menace |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 9 | +15 | 15 | 2.50 |
14 |
![]() Midwest United |
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 6 | +12 | 15 | 2.14 |
15 |
![]() Peoria City |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 15 | 2.50 |
16 |
![]() Evergreen |
7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 5 | +10 | 15 | 2.14 |
17 |
![]() Rochester |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 15 | 2.50 |
18 |
![]() Flatirons Rush |
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 15 | 2.50 |
19 |
![]() West Chester United II |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 14 | 2.00 |
20 |
![]() SF Glens |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 14 | 2.00 |
21 |
![]() Tennessee |
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 14 | 2.33 |
22 |
![]() Virginia Beach United |
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 14 | 2.00 |
23 |
![]() Little Rock Rangers |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 3 | +13 | 13 | 2.17 |
24 |
![]() Pinellas County |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | +13 | 13 | 2.17 |
25 |
![]() FC Motown II |
5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 13 | 2.60 |
26 |
![]() Almaden |
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 13 | 1.63 |
27 |
![]() Steel City |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 13 | 2.17 |
28 |
![]() Utah United |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 13 | 1.86 |
29 |
![]() AHFC Royals |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 13 | 1.86 |
30 |
![]() Long Island Rough Riders |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 13 | 2.17 |
31 |
![]() Sarasota Paradise |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | 2.17 |
32 |
![]() Sporting JAX |
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 13 | 1.86 |
33 |
![]() Birmingham Legion II |
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 13 | 2.17 |
34 |
![]() FC Tucson |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 5 | +26 | 12 | 2.40 |
35 |
![]() Redlands |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 12 | 2.40 |
36 |
![]() Discoveries |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | +9 | 12 | 2.40 |
37 |
![]() Dothan United |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 3 | +8 | 12 | 2.40 |
38 |
![]() Michigan Bucks |
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 12 | 2.00 |
39 |
![]() Annapolis Blues |
5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 12 | 2.40 |
40 |
![]() North Carolina Fusion U23 |
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 12 | 2.00 |
41 |
![]() RKC |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 11 | 1.83 |
42 |
![]() Lane United |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 11 | 1.83 |
43 |
![]() San Francisco City |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 11 | 1.57 |
44 |
![]() Ann Arbor |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 11 | 1.57 |
45 |
![]() Brooke House |
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 1.83 |
46 |
![]() Black Rock FC |
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 11 | 1.57 |
47 |
![]() City SC |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 5 | +13 | 10 | 2.00 |
48 |
![]() New England SC |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 10 | 1.67 |
49 |
![]() Hudson Valley Hammers |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 10 | 2.00 |
50 |
![]() FC Buffalo |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
51 |
![]() Ocean City Nor'easters |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
52 |
![]() Hattiesburg |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 10 | 2.00 |
53 |
![]() Sueno |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 10 | 2.00 |
54 |
![]() Academica |
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 |
55 |
![]() Corpus Christi |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 1.67 |
56 |
![]() Denton Diablos |
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 |
57 |
![]() Union Macomb |
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | 1.43 |
58 |
![]() Northern Indiana |
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 10 | 2.00 |
59 |
![]() Ventura County Fusion |
4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | +15 | 9 | 2.25 |
60 |
![]() Nona |
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 9 | 1.80 |
61 |
![]() Lonestar |
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 9 | 1.80 |
62 |
![]() Louisiana Krewe |
4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 9 | 2.25 |
63 |
![]() Inter Gainesville |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 9 | 1.50 |
64 |
![]() AC Connecticut |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 |
65 |
![]() Oakland County |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 |
66 |
![]() Sunflower State |
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 9 | 1.50 |
67 |
![]() Project 51O |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 9 | 1.29 |
68 |
![]() Springfield |
7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 9 | 1.29 |
69 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 8 | 1.60 |
70 |
![]() Columbus United |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 8 | 1.33 |
71 |
![]() Real Central New Jersey |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 8 | 1.33 |
72 |
![]() Toledo Villa |
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 8 | 1.60 |
73 |
![]() Tobacco Road FC |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 8 | 1.33 |
74 |
![]() Houston FC |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
75 |
![]() GFI |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
76 |
![]() River Light |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
77 |
![]() AMSG |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 | 1.33 |
78 |
![]() Kings Hammer |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 | 1.33 |
79 |
![]() Kings Hammer Sun City |
8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 | 1.00 |
80 |
![]() Midlakes United |
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 | 1.14 |
81 |
![]() New Jersey Copa FC |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 7 | 1.40 |
82 |
![]() SC United Bantams |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 | 1.40 |
83 |
![]() Brazos Valley |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
84 |
![]() Charlotte Eagles |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
85 |
![]() Lehigh Valley Utd. Sonic |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 1.40 |
86 |
![]() Southern California Seahorses |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 7 | 1.00 |
87 |
![]() Bigfoot |
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 |
88 |
![]() Westchester Flames |
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 | 1.17 |
89 |
![]() Seacoast United Phantoms |
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 7 | 1.17 |
90 |
![]() Weston FC |
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 7 | 1.00 |
91 |
![]() Cedar Stars Rush |
5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
92 |
![]() North Carolina II |
5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
93 |
![]() Miami FC |
5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 1.20 |
94 |
![]() Colorado Storm |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 | 1.50 |
95 |
![]() Morris Elite |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 | 1.50 |
96 |
![]() Staten Island Athletic |
5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 | 1.20 |
97 |
![]() St. Louis Ambush |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 | 0.86 |
98 |
![]() Southern Soccer Academy |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 6 | 0.86 |
99 |
![]() Kalamazoo FC |
6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 6 | 1.00 |
100 |
![]() Blackwatch Rush |
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 6 | 0.86 |
View more standings |
Data and Statistics for City SC vs FC Tucson
Check out the summary of team statistics with various relevant information to support your football prediction.
You can check all the statistics for City SC vs FC Tucson below.

City SC vs FC Tucson Preview, Livescore and H2H
On APWin, you can also check all the statistics for the USL League Two.
Where to watch City SC vs FC Tucson live?
See below where to watch the match.
You can also find all the options to watch the USL League Two.
Facts and Curiosities for City SC vs FC Tucson
The bookmakers place FC Tucson as the favorite to win the match, with a 23% chance of victory. During the analysis of this prediction, the average odds were as follows:
City SC - 4.35.
Draw - 4.86.
FC Tucson - 1.76.
The last match between the teams took place on , in the , and won the match. The final score was -.