# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
15 | 65% |
2 |
![]() New Mexico United |
13 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
14 | 61% |
4 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
13 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
13 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
13 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 52% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 45% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 45% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
10 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Lexington |
10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
6 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 23% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 82% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 64% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 42% |
11 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 36% |
14 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Loudoun United |
4 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
3 | 27% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 27% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
17 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
17 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 65% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
15 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Lexington |
13 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 54% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
12 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 54% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
12 | 54% |
13 |
![]() Orange County |
11 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
12 | 52% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 52% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 40% |
21 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 39% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 34% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
3 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 27% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
8 | 72% |
4 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 63% |
11 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 63% |
13 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 63% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 58% |
16 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 41% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
4 | 36% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Tulsa Roughnecks and Las Vegas Lights in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Tulsa Roughnecks has come out and scored the first goal in 57% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 43% of matches.
Meanwhile, Las Vegas Lights comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 30% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 69% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.