Tulsa Roughnecks 1 - 4 Colorado Springs
01.09.2024 - 18:00
Stadium: ONEOK Field (Tulsa, Oklahoma)
Finished
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Colorado Springs |
26 | 68% |
| 2 |
Louisville City |
23 | 64% |
| 3 |
Sacramento Republic |
21 | 60% |
| 4 |
Detroit City FC |
21 | 60% |
| 5 |
New Mexico United |
20 | 56% |
| 6 |
Rhode Island |
20 | 53% |
| 7 |
North Carolina FC |
18 | 51% |
| 8 |
Memphis 901 |
17 | 49% |
| 9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
17 | 49% |
| 10 |
Orange County |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 46% |
| 12 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 46% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 44% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
15 | 44% |
| 15 |
Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 41% |
| 16 |
El Paso Locomotive |
14 | 41% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
14 | 40% |
| 18 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 38% |
| 19 |
Birmingham Legion |
12 | 35% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
12 | 34% |
| 21 |
Loudoun United |
11 | 32% |
| 22 |
Hartford Athletic |
11 | 32% |
| 23 |
Miami FC II |
32 | 31% |
| 24 |
Monterey Bay |
10 | 29% |
| 25 |
Miami FC |
10 | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Colorado Springs |
15 | 71% |
| 2 |
New Mexico United |
13 | 68% |
| 3 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 65% |
| 4 |
Sacramento Republic |
10 | 59% |
| 5 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 59% |
| 6 |
Louisville City |
11 | 58% |
| 7 |
Detroit City FC |
10 | 56% |
| 8 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 55% |
| 9 |
San Antonio |
9 | 53% |
| 10 |
Orange County |
9 | 53% |
| 11 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 50% |
| 12 |
Indy Eleven |
9 | 50% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 47% |
| 14 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 47% |
| 15 |
Hartford Athletic |
7 | 41% |
| 16 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 41% |
| 17 |
El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 41% |
| 18 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 35% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
6 | 35% |
| 20 |
Miami FC II |
17 | 29% |
| 21 |
Birmingham Legion |
5 | 29% |
| 22 |
Loudoun United |
5 | 29% |
| 23 |
Oakland Roots |
5 | 29% |
| 24 |
Miami FC |
5 | 29% |
| 25 |
Las Vegas Lights |
4 | 22% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
12 | 71% |
| 2 |
Rhode Island |
14 | 67% |
| 3 |
Colorado Springs |
11 | 65% |
| 4 |
Detroit City FC |
11 | 65% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
11 | 61% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 58% |
| 7 |
Memphis 901 |
8 | 47% |
| 8 |
Orange County |
8 | 42% |
| 9 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 42% |
| 10 |
Indy Eleven |
7 | 41% |
| 11 |
New Mexico United |
7 | 41% |
| 12 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 41% |
| 13 |
El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 41% |
| 14 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 39% |
| 15 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 39% |
| 16 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 39% |
| 17 |
San Antonio |
6 | 35% |
| 18 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 35% |
| 19 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 35% |
| 20 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 35% |
| 21 |
Miami FC II |
15 | 33% |
| 22 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 33% |
| 23 |
Miami FC |
5 | 29% |
| 24 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 24% |
| 25 |
Hartford Athletic |
4 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Monterey Bay |
24 | 70% |
| 2 |
Miami FC |
24 | 70% |
| 3 |
Miami FC II |
32 | 69% |
| 4 |
Hartford Athletic |
23 | 67% |
| 5 |
Loudoun United |
23 | 67% |
| 6 |
Oakland Roots |
23 | 65% |
| 7 |
Birmingham Legion |
22 | 64% |
| 8 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
21 | 61% |
| 9 |
Phoenix Rising |
21 | 60% |
| 10 |
Las Vegas Lights |
22 | 59% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
20 | 58% |
| 12 |
San Antonio |
19 | 55% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 55% |
| 14 |
Charleston Battery |
20 | 54% |
| 15 |
Indy Eleven |
19 | 54% |
| 16 |
Orange County |
19 | 52% |
| 17 |
Memphis 901 |
18 | 51% |
| 18 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
18 | 51% |
| 19 |
North Carolina FC |
17 | 48% |
| 20 |
Rhode Island |
18 | 47% |
| 21 |
New Mexico United |
16 | 44% |
| 22 |
Detroit City FC |
14 | 40% |
| 23 |
Sacramento Republic |
14 | 40% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
13 | 36% |
| 25 |
Colorado Springs |
12 | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
14 | 77% |
| 2 |
Miami FC II |
17 | 71% |
| 3 |
Loudoun United |
12 | 70% |
| 4 |
Birmingham Legion |
12 | 70% |
| 5 |
Oakland Roots |
12 | 70% |
| 6 |
Miami FC |
12 | 70% |
| 7 |
Rhode Island |
11 | 64% |
| 8 |
Monterey Bay |
11 | 64% |
| 9 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 58% |
| 10 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 58% |
| 11 |
Hartford Athletic |
10 | 58% |
| 12 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 52% |
| 13 |
Phoenix Rising |
9 | 52% |
| 14 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 50% |
| 15 |
Indy Eleven |
9 | 50% |
| 16 |
San Antonio |
8 | 47% |
| 17 |
Orange County |
8 | 47% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 45% |
| 19 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 44% |
| 20 |
Louisville City |
8 | 42% |
| 21 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 41% |
| 22 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 41% |
| 23 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 35% |
| 24 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 31% |
| 25 |
Colorado Springs |
6 | 28% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hartford Athletic |
13 | 76% |
| 2 |
Monterey Bay |
13 | 76% |
| 3 |
Miami FC |
12 | 70% |
| 4 |
Miami FC II |
15 | 67% |
| 5 |
Phoenix Rising |
12 | 66% |
| 6 |
San Antonio |
11 | 64% |
| 7 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 64% |
| 8 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 64% |
| 9 |
Loudoun United |
11 | 64% |
| 10 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 61% |
| 11 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 61% |
| 12 |
Oakland Roots |
11 | 61% |
| 13 |
Indy Eleven |
10 | 58% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 58% |
| 15 |
Birmingham Legion |
10 | 58% |
| 16 |
New Mexico United |
10 | 58% |
| 17 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 57% |
| 18 |
Orange County |
11 | 57% |
| 19 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 52% |
| 20 |
Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 42% |
| 21 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 38% |
| 22 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 35% |
| 23 |
Colorado Springs |
6 | 35% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
7 | 33% |
| 25 |
Louisville City |
5 | 29% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Tulsa Roughnecks and Colorado Springs in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Tulsa Roughnecks has come out and scored the first goal in 38% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 61% of matches.
Meanwhile, Colorado Springs comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 68% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 31% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.