Suzhou Dongwu 3 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring
26.04.2021 - 03:30
Stadium: Tazi Lake Sports Centre (Wuhan)
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 53% | 41% | 24% |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 53% | 29% | 21% |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 32% | 21% | 6% |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 41% | 29% | 12% |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 41% | 38% | 18% |
| 6 |
BIT |
34 | 41% | 21% | 15% |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 47% | 32% | 18% |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 65% | 50% | 32% |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 32% | 21% | 12% |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 53% | 38% | 29% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 47% | 29% | 15% |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 38% | 29% | 9% |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 47% | 29% | 18% |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 38% | 26% | 18% |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 59% | 47% | 35% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 44% | 24% | 15% |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 56% | 38% | 21% |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 24% | 9% | 3% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 56% | 26% | 6% |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 71% | 44% | 21% |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 47% | 15% | 3% |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 29% | 18% | 6% |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 50% | 24% | 12% |
| 6 |
BIT |
34 | 41% | 15% | 9% |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 44% | 35% | 15% |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 56% | 38% | 18% |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 35% | 24% | 9% |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 50% | 26% | 9% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 38% | 15% | 3% |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 47% | 26% | 18% |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 56% | 38% | 21% |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 41% | 21% | 12% |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 44% | 24% | 12% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 50% | 26% | 18% |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 50% | 32% | 18% |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 29% | 12% | 3% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 53% | 35% | 18% |
| 2 |
Guizhou Zhicheng |
34 | 26% | 15% | 9% |
| 3 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 35% | 18% | 6% |
| 4 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 44% | 26% | 9% |
| 5 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 47% | 29% | 12% |
| 6 |
BIT |
34 | 50% | 29% | 9% |
| 7 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 32% | 24% | 6% |
| 8 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 62% | 38% | 24% |
| 9 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 35% | 9% | 6% |
| 10 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 59% | 44% | 24% |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 56% | 29% | 12% |
| 12 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 38% | 12% | 3% |
| 13 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 47% | 15% | 9% |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 47% | 24% | 9% |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 65% | 50% | 29% |
| 16 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 50% | 12% | 0% |
| 17 |
Kunshan |
34 | 53% | 35% | 24% |
| 18 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 35% | 15% | 3% |
Check out all the card statistics for Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Suzhou Dongwu has played 34 matches in the China League One and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 41% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 21% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 12% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Heilongjiang Lava Spring has, in 34 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 56% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 38% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 18% of matches.
Card statistics for Suzhou Dongwu vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.