# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Naples |
9 | 60% |
3 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 46% |
8 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 40% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
5 | 36% |
11 |
![]() Forward Madison |
5 | 36% |
12 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Alta |
5 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
3 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Texoma |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Forward Madison |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
3 | 38% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 33% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
2 | 33% |
12 |
![]() Union Omaha |
1 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Alta |
2 | 22% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 86% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 83% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
5 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 50% |
6 |
![]() One Knoxville |
4 | 44% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 43% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
2 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 38% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
1 | 17% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
12 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Alta |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
7 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 42% |
12 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Alta |
7 | 77% |
2 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Union Omaha |
2 | 66% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 66% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 66% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Forward Madison |
3 | 42% |
11 |
![]() Texoma |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
2 | 28% |
13 |
![]() Westchester SC |
2 | 28% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 83% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
5 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
5 | 62% |
7 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 57% |
9 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
2 | 28% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
1 | 16% |
14 |
![]() Naples |
1 | 14% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Spokane Velocity and Union Omaha in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Spokane Velocity has come out and scored the first goal in 67% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 33% of matches.
Meanwhile, Union Omaha comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 46% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 53% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.