Sichuan Jiuniu 0 - 2 Qingdao Jonoon
19.09.2022 - 03:30
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 24 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 16 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 17 | 50% | 47% | 53% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 19 | 56% | 53% | 59% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 18 | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 20 | 59% | 59% | 59% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 14 | 41% | 24% | 59% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 20 | 59% | 47% | 71% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 20 | 59% | 59% | 59% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 14 | 41% | 53% | 29% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 18 | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 19 | 56% | 65% | 47% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 17 | 50% | 59% | 41% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 24% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 17 | 50% | 47% | 53% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 17 | 50% | 59% | 41% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 18 | 53% | 59% | 47% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 14 | 41% | 35% | 47% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 32 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 32 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 33 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 30 | 88% | 82% | 94% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 30 | 88% | 82% | 94% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 25 | 74% | 71% | 76% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 32 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 31 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 29 | 85% | 88% | 82% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 32 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 28 | 82% | 88% | 76% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 30 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 30 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 29 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 25 | 74% | 76% | 71% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 29 | 85% | 94% | 76% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 27 | 79% | 82% | 76% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 29 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 28 | 82% | 76% | 88% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 25 | 74% | 71% | 76% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 24 | 71% | 65% | 76% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 24 | 71% | 76% | 65% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 18 | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 28 | 82% | 88% | 76% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 28 | 82% | 76% | 88% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 23 | 68% | 71% | 65% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 24 | 71% | 76% | 65% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 29 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 24 | 71% | 76% | 65% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 25 | 74% | 76% | 71% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 23 | 68% | 53% | 82% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 13 | 38% | 35% | 41% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 8 | 24% | 29% | 18% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 8 | 24% | 18% | 29% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 12 | 35% | 24% | 47% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 9 | 26% | 35% | 18% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 11 | 32% | 35% | 29% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 9 | 26% | 18% | 35% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 7 | 21% | 12% | 29% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 11 | 32% | 35% | 29% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 7 | 21% | 29% | 12% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 24% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 14 | 41% | 53% | 29% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 5 | 15% | 6% | 24% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 10 | 29% | 35% | 24% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 10 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 11 | 32% | 24% | 41% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 7 | 21% | 24% | 18% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 7 | 21% | 29% | 12% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 7 | 21% | 18% | 24% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 18% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 4 | 12% | 0% | 24% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 3 | 9% | 12% | 6% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 7 | 21% | 35% | 6% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 6 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 18% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 12% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 10 | 29% | 29% | 29% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 18 | 53% | 53% | 53% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 17 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 15 | 44% | 47% | 41% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 16 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 14 | 41% | 41% | 41% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 20 | 59% | 76% | 41% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 14 | 41% | 53% | 29% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 14 | 41% | 41% | 41% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 20 | 59% | 47% | 71% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 16 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 15 | 44% | 35% | 53% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 17 | 50% | 41% | 59% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 26 | 76% | 76% | 76% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 17 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 17 | 50% | 41% | 59% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 16 | 47% | 41% | 53% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 20 | 59% | 65% | 53% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 4 | 12% | 18% | 6% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 4 | 12% | 18% | 6% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 9 | 26% | 29% | 24% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 3 | 9% | 12% | 6% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 18% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 6 | 18% | 12% | 24% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 12% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 9 | 26% | 24% | 29% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 5 | 15% | 6% | 24% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 7 | 21% | 18% | 24% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 12% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 6 | 18% | 24% | 12% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 9 | 26% | 29% | 24% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 10 | 29% | 35% | 24% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 10 | 29% | 24% | 35% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 16 | 47% | 47% | 47% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 6 | 18% | 12% | 24% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 6 | 18% | 24% | 12% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 11 | 32% | 29% | 35% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 10 | 29% | 24% | 35% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 12% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 10 | 29% | 24% | 35% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 9 | 26% | 24% | 29% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 11 | 32% | 47% | 18% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 21 | 62% | 65% | 59% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 26 | 76% | 71% | 82% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 26 | 76% | 82% | 71% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 22 | 65% | 76% | 53% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 25 | 74% | 65% | 82% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 23 | 68% | 65% | 71% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 25 | 74% | 82% | 65% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 27 | 79% | 88% | 71% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 23 | 68% | 65% | 71% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 27 | 79% | 71% | 88% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 26 | 76% | 76% | 76% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 20 | 59% | 47% | 71% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 29 | 85% | 94% | 76% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 32 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 24 | 71% | 65% | 76% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 24 | 71% | 71% | 71% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 23 | 68% | 76% | 59% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 27 | 79% | 76% | 82% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 27 | 79% | 71% | 88% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 27 | 79% | 82% | 76% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 30 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 33 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 30 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 30 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 31 | 91% | 100% | 82% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 30 | 88% | 100% | 76% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 31 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 33 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 27 | 79% | 65% | 94% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 33 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 32 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 28 | 82% | 82% | 82% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 30 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 29 | 85% | 88% | 82% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 30 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 30 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 29 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 33 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 32 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 32 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 31 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 34 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 32 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 32 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
You can check out how often Sichuan Jiuniu and Qingdao Jonoon matches in the China League One go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
71% of Sichuan Jiuniu’s matches in the China League One have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 24%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Qingdao Jonoon’s case, 15% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 50%.
You can also see whether Sichuan Jiuniu and Qingdao Jonoon matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in China League One.
The over/under goal analysis for Sichuan Jiuniu vs Qingdao Jonoon offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.