# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
12 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
10 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
8 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
7 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
7 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
7 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
6 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
3 | 19% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
3 | 19% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
7 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
7 | 88% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
6 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
3 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
3 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
3 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
2 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 25% |
16 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
1 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
6 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
4 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
2 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Dongguan United |
2 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
2 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
2 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
1 | 14% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
1 | 13% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
13 | 81% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
13 | 81% |
3 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
10 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
9 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
9 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
9 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
9 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
8 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
7 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 31% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
4 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
7 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
4 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
5 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
5 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
3 | 42% |
13 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
2 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 25% |
15 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
1 | 12% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
1 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
8 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
7 | 87% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 85% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
6 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
6 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 71% |
7 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 71% |
8 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
5 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
3 | 42% |
15 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
3 | 37% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Shenzhen Juniors and Shenyang Urban in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Shenzhen Juniors has come out and scored the first goal in 50% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 50% of matches.
Meanwhile, Shenyang Urban comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 75% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 25% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.