# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
30 | 14 | 47% |
2 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
30 | 11 | 37% |
3 |
![]() Liaoning Kaixin |
30 | 9 | 30% |
4 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
30 | 9 | 30% |
5 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 9 | 30% |
6 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 8 | 27% |
7 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 8 | 27% |
8 |
![]() Meizhou Meixian Techand |
30 | 7 | 23% |
9 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 6 | 20% |
10 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 6 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 6 | 20% |
12 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 6 | 20% |
13 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 6 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 5 | 17% |
15 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
30 | 5 | 17% |
16 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 3 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
15 | 8 | 53% |
2 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 7 | 47% |
3 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 7 | 47% |
4 |
![]() Liaoning Kaixin |
15 | 6 | 40% |
5 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 6 | 40% |
6 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
15 | 6 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Meizhou Meixian Techand |
15 | 6 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Hangzhou |
15 | 5 | 33% |
9 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
15 | 5 | 33% |
10 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 4 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
15 | 4 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
15 | 3 | 20% |
13 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 3 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 3 | 20% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
15 | 3 | 20% |
16 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 2 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
15 | 6 | 40% |
2 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
15 | 4 | 27% |
3 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
15 | 4 | 27% |
4 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
15 | 4 | 27% |
5 |
![]() Liaoning Kaixin |
15 | 3 | 20% |
6 |
![]() Yanbian Funde |
15 | 3 | 20% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
15 | 3 | 20% |
8 |
![]() Shenzhen |
15 | 3 | 20% |
9 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
15 | 2 | 13% |
10 |
![]() Beijing BG |
15 | 2 | 13% |
11 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
15 | 2 | 13% |
12 |
![]() Hangzhou |
15 | 1 | 7% |
13 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
15 | 1 | 7% |
14 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
15 | 1 | 7% |
15 |
![]() Meizhou Meixian Techand |
15 | 1 | 7% |
16 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
15 | 0 | 0% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Shanghai Shenxin vs Yanbian Funde:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Search
Most Popular search
No results found
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.