# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
12 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
11 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
10 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
9 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Nanjing City |
8 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
7 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Dongguan United |
7 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
7 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
6 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
6 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
3 | 19% |
16 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
3 | 19% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
7 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
7 | 88% |
3 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
6 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
3 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
3 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
3 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
2 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
2 | 25% |
16 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
1 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
6 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
5 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
4 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
4 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
3 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
2 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Dongguan United |
2 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
2 | 25% |
13 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
2 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
1 | 14% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
1 | 13% |
16 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
13 | 81% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
13 | 81% |
3 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
10 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
9 | 56% |
9 |
![]() Dongguan United |
9 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
8 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Nanjing City |
8 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
7 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
5 | 33% |
15 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
5 | 31% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
4 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
7 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
4 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
5 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
4 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Dongguan United |
4 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
4 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
3 | 42% |
13 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 25% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
2 | 25% |
15 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
1 | 12% |
16 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
1 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Yanbian Longding |
8 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Qingdao Red Lions |
7 | 87% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Jiading |
6 | 85% |
4 |
![]() Shaanxi Union |
6 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Guangxi Baoyun |
6 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Dongguan United |
5 | 71% |
7 |
![]() Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
5 | 71% |
8 |
![]() Dalian Huayi |
4 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Suzhou Dongwu |
5 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Shenzhen Juniors |
5 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Nanjing City |
4 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Hebei Kungfu |
4 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Guangzhou E-Power |
4 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Chongqing Tongliang Long |
3 | 42% |
15 |
![]() Nantong Zhiyun |
3 | 37% |
16 |
![]() Shenyang Urban |
2 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Shanghai Jiading and Yanbian Longding in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Shanghai Jiading has come out and scored the first goal in 38% of the matches they have played so far in the China League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 62% of matches.
Meanwhile, Yanbian Longding comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 44% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 56% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in China League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.