Favourite this Match

Shanghai Jiading 1 - 1 Hebei Kungfu

15.10.2023 - 07:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

30 16 53%
2
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

30 17 57%
3
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

30 16 53%
4
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

30 11 37%
5
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

30 13 43%
6
Dantong Hantong Team Logo

Dantong Hantong

30 17 57%
7
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

30 12 40%
8
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

30 15 50%
9
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

30 11 37%
10
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

30 12 40%
11
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

30 13 43%
12
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

30 13 43%
13
Wuxi Wugou Team Logo

Wuxi Wugou

30 16 53%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

30 13 43%
15
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

30 14 47%
16
Jinan Xingzhou Team Logo

Jinan Xingzhou

30 13 43%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

15 7 47%
2
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

15 9 60%
3
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

15 9 60%
4
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

15 3 20%
5
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

15 6 40%
6
Dantong Hantong Team Logo

Dantong Hantong

15 13 87%
7
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

15 7 47%
8
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

15 7 47%
9
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

15 7 47%
10
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

15 5 33%
11
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

15 6 40%
12
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

15 7 47%
13
Wuxi Wugou Team Logo

Wuxi Wugou

15 7 47%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

15 7 47%
15
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

15 6 40%
16
Jinan Xingzhou Team Logo

Jinan Xingzhou

15 5 33%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Guangzhou Evergrande Team Logo

Guangzhou Evergrande

15 9 60%
2
Jiangxi Liansheng Team Logo

Jiangxi Liansheng

15 8 53%
3
Heilongjiang Lava Spring Team Logo

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

15 7 47%
4
Guangxi Baoyun Team Logo

Guangxi Baoyun

15 8 53%
5
Shenyang Urban Team Logo

Shenyang Urban

15 7 47%
6
Dantong Hantong Team Logo

Dantong Hantong

15 4 27%
7
Shanghai Jiading Team Logo

Shanghai Jiading

15 5 33%
8
Suzhou Dongwu Team Logo

Suzhou Dongwu

15 8 53%
9
Sichuan Jiuniu Team Logo

Sichuan Jiuniu

15 4 27%
10
Nanjing City Team Logo

Nanjing City

15 7 47%
11
Dongguan United Team Logo

Dongguan United

15 7 47%
12
Yanbian Longding Team Logo

Yanbian Longding

15 6 40%
13
Wuxi Wugou Team Logo

Wuxi Wugou

15 9 60%
14
Qingdao Youth Island Team Logo

Qingdao Youth Island

15 6 40%
15
Hebei Kungfu Team Logo

Hebei Kungfu

15 8 53%
16
Jinan Xingzhou Team Logo

Jinan Xingzhou

15 8 53%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Shanghai Jiading and Hebei Kungfu have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 30 matches played in the China League One, Shanghai Jiading has scored and conceded goals in 12 matches. In other words, 40% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 47% at home, while it is 33% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Hebei Kungfu has scored and conceded in 14 of their 30 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 47%. Both teams have scored in 6 of Hebei Kungfu’s 15 home matches, and it has happened 8 times in 15 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets