Cards: Shaanxi Union vs Qingdao Red Lions
Sun, 19 October 2025 - 03:30
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
25 | 40% | 36% | 24% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
25 | 44% | 32% | 8% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
25 | 56% | 44% | 28% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
25 | 48% | 24% | 12% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
25 | 44% | 40% | 24% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
25 | 40% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
24 | 58% | 46% | 29% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
25 | 60% | 48% | 24% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
25 | 64% | 56% | 16% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
25 | 52% | 36% | 12% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
25 | 68% | 40% | 28% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
25 | 52% | 32% | 20% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
24 | 58% | 42% | 21% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
25 | 60% | 36% | 20% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
25 | 56% | 40% | 16% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
25 | 68% | 40% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
25 | 44% | 16% | 4% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
25 | 48% | 20% | 0% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
25 | 56% | 36% | 16% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
25 | 44% | 20% | 4% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
25 | 64% | 44% | 16% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
25 | 48% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
24 | 71% | 42% | 21% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
25 | 56% | 32% | 12% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
25 | 80% | 40% | 16% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
25 | 56% | 24% | 16% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
25 | 72% | 44% | 12% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
25 | 40% | 24% | 16% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
24 | 42% | 29% | 4% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
25 | 64% | 36% | 20% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
25 | 56% | 24% | 12% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
25 | 64% | 32% | 12% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
25 | 52% | 32% | 20% |
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
25 | 48% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
25 | 60% | 28% | 12% |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban |
25 | 52% | 24% | 0% |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi |
25 | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 |
Shanghai Jiading |
25 | 44% | 16% | 0% |
| 7 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
24 | 58% | 38% | 8% |
| 8 |
Qingdao Red Lions |
25 | 68% | 36% | 28% |
| 9 |
Nanjing City |
25 | 52% | 28% | 12% |
| 10 |
Dongguan United |
25 | 48% | 28% | 8% |
| 11 |
Yanbian Longding |
25 | 56% | 44% | 12% |
| 12 |
Hebei Kungfu |
25 | 60% | 36% | 20% |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long |
24 | 75% | 46% | 29% |
| 14 |
Shenzhen Juniors |
25 | 60% | 32% | 4% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou E-Power |
25 | 64% | 24% | 16% |
| 16 |
Shaanxi Union |
25 | 72% | 28% | 8% |
Check out all the card statistics for Shaanxi Union vs Qingdao Red Lions here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Shaanxi Union has played 25 matches in the China League One and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 64% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 32% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 12% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Qingdao Red Lions has, in 25 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 56% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 32% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 12% of matches.
Card statistics for Shaanxi Union vs Qingdao Red Lions bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the China League One, just check out the table above.