# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 59% |
4 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
15 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
15 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Orange County |
13 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
13 | 46% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 44% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
12 | 43% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 43% |
16 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 39% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 39% |
21 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 54% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
20 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Rhode Island |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Loudoun United |
17 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 60% |
9 |
![]() San Antonio |
16 | 59% |
10 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
16 | 57% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
15 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 51% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 46% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 40% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 69% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 84% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() San Antonio |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
13 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 42% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Sacramento Republic and Charleston Battery in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Sacramento Republic has come out and scored the first goal in 59% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 40% of matches.
Meanwhile, Charleston Battery comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 58% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 42% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.