# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
13 | 68% |
2 |
![]() One Knoxville |
12 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
13 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Naples |
11 | 55% |
5 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
11 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Westchester SC |
10 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
9 | 45% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
9 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 40% |
11 |
![]() AV Alta |
8 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() AV Alta |
5 | 45% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
5 | 42% |
13 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 40% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 60% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 45% |
5 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 45% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 42% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 30% |
9 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 30% |
10 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
3 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 22% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
2 | 22% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
14 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
12 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
14 | 66% |
4 |
![]() AV Alta |
13 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
12 | 60% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
12 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Texoma |
12 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
11 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
10 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
10 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Naples |
9 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 35% |
13 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 31% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 60% |
2 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 60% |
3 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 57% |
5 |
![]() AV Alta |
6 | 54% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 27% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
7 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 70% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 54% |
11 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
4 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 30% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
2 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Richmond Kickers and Naples in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Richmond Kickers has come out and scored the first goal in 40% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 60% of matches.
Meanwhile, Naples comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 55% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 45% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.