# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
11 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
10 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
10 | 56% |
5 |
![]() Naples |
9 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Westchester SC |
8 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 41% |
8 |
![]() Alta |
7 | 41% |
9 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
7 | 41% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
7 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
5 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 78% |
3 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Texoma |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Forward Madison |
5 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 50% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Alta |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
3 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
3 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Union Omaha |
1 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
5 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 45% |
5 |
![]() One Knoxville |
4 | 44% |
6 |
![]() Alta |
3 | 43% |
7 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
3 | 43% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 38% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 33% |
10 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 30% |
11 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 25% |
12 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
2 | 22% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
1 | 14% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
13 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Forward Madison |
10 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
10 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Union Omaha |
9 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Texoma |
10 | 58% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
10 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
10 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Alta |
10 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
8 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Naples |
8 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 37% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 35% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Union Omaha |
3 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 62% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Alta |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Forward Madison |
4 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
4 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Texoma |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Westchester SC |
3 | 37% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
2 | 22% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
6 | 85% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
6 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Alta |
4 | 57% |
9 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
4 | 57% |
10 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Union Omaha |
6 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
3 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
2 | 28% |
14 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
2 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Richmond Kickers and Greenville Triumph in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Richmond Kickers has come out and scored the first goal in 41% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 58% of matches.
Meanwhile, Greenville Triumph comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 28% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 72% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.