Phoenix Rising 2 - 3 San Diego Loyal
19.09.2020 - 22:30
Stadium: Casino Arizona Field (Scottsdale, Arizona)
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
15 | 60% | 33% | 20% |
| 2 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 56% | 50% | 44% |
| 3 |
Miami FC |
16 | 63% | 50% | 31% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 68% | 37% | 11% |
| 5 |
Phoenix Rising |
19 | 74% | 58% | 32% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 50% | 31% | 25% |
| 7 |
Atlanta United II |
16 | 75% | 44% | 31% |
| 8 |
Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 50% | 38% | 19% |
| 9 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 75% | 63% | 63% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
17 | 65% | 47% | 35% |
| 11 |
OKC Energy |
16 | 75% | 63% | 38% |
| 12 |
LA Galaxy II |
17 | 65% | 47% | 24% |
| 13 |
Sacramento Republic |
17 | 76% | 59% | 41% |
| 14 |
Reno 1868 |
18 | 61% | 50% | 39% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union II |
16 | 56% | 31% | 13% |
| 16 |
Rio Grande Valley |
14 | 64% | 43% | 29% |
| 17 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 76% | 41% | 41% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Independence |
17 | 71% | 47% | 41% |
| 19 |
New York RB II |
16 | 69% | 56% | 31% |
| 20 |
Colorado Springs |
16 | 69% | 38% | 6% |
| 21 |
Louisville City |
19 | 47% | 21% | 11% |
| 22 |
Real Monarchs |
16 | 69% | 44% | 25% |
| 23 |
Saint Louis |
18 | 67% | 39% | 33% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
16 | 56% | 44% | 31% |
| 25 |
Orange County SC |
16 | 88% | 69% | 25% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
17 | 76% | 71% | 47% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
16 | 63% | 38% | 25% |
| 28 |
New Mexico United |
17 | 76% | 59% | 29% |
| 29 |
Memphis 901 |
15 | 73% | 60% | 40% |
| 30 |
Loudoun United |
13 | 85% | 62% | 54% |
| 31 |
Hartford Athletic |
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% |
| 32 |
Birmingham Legion |
17 | 71% | 59% | 35% |
| 33 |
El Paso Locomotive |
19 | 89% | 74% | 47% |
| 34 |
Austin Bold |
16 | 81% | 50% | 38% |
| 35 |
San Diego Loyal |
16 | 81% | 63% | 38% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
15 | 67% | 27% | 7% |
| 2 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 69% | 38% | 19% |
| 3 |
Miami FC |
16 | 81% | 56% | 25% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 47% | 16% | 11% |
| 5 |
Phoenix Rising |
19 | 68% | 47% | 11% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 81% | 31% | 25% |
| 7 |
Atlanta United II |
16 | 81% | 38% | 19% |
| 8 |
Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 44% | 19% | 13% |
| 9 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 88% | 56% | 31% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
17 | 59% | 18% | 6% |
| 11 |
OKC Energy |
16 | 81% | 63% | 44% |
| 12 |
LA Galaxy II |
17 | 71% | 41% | 24% |
| 13 |
Sacramento Republic |
17 | 88% | 65% | 29% |
| 14 |
Reno 1868 |
18 | 61% | 28% | 11% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union II |
16 | 50% | 25% | 0% |
| 16 |
Rio Grande Valley |
14 | 57% | 29% | 14% |
| 17 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 71% | 41% | 24% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Independence |
17 | 65% | 41% | 29% |
| 19 |
New York RB II |
16 | 69% | 38% | 19% |
| 20 |
Colorado Springs |
16 | 63% | 19% | 6% |
| 21 |
Louisville City |
19 | 53% | 16% | 5% |
| 22 |
Real Monarchs |
16 | 50% | 38% | 31% |
| 23 |
Saint Louis |
18 | 67% | 28% | 6% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
16 | 56% | 38% | 19% |
| 25 |
Orange County SC |
16 | 81% | 19% | 13% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
17 | 59% | 29% | 18% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
16 | 75% | 38% | 31% |
| 28 |
New Mexico United |
17 | 76% | 35% | 24% |
| 29 |
Memphis 901 |
15 | 73% | 53% | 13% |
| 30 |
Loudoun United |
13 | 77% | 69% | 31% |
| 31 |
Hartford Athletic |
17 | 88% | 71% | 29% |
| 32 |
Birmingham Legion |
17 | 76% | 41% | 29% |
| 33 |
El Paso Locomotive |
19 | 89% | 47% | 16% |
| 34 |
Austin Bold |
16 | 81% | 63% | 25% |
| 35 |
San Diego Loyal |
16 | 81% | 69% | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
15 | 53% | 47% | 20% |
| 2 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 75% | 50% | 31% |
| 3 |
Miami FC |
16 | 56% | 38% | 25% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 84% | 47% | 21% |
| 5 |
Phoenix Rising |
19 | 89% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 44% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 |
Atlanta United II |
16 | 81% | 38% | 6% |
| 8 |
Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 63% | 38% | 13% |
| 9 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 63% | 50% | 31% |
| 10 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
17 | 71% | 59% | 29% |
| 11 |
OKC Energy |
16 | 56% | 31% | 13% |
| 12 |
LA Galaxy II |
17 | 59% | 29% | 18% |
| 13 |
Sacramento Republic |
17 | 76% | 29% | 12% |
| 14 |
Reno 1868 |
18 | 67% | 50% | 39% |
| 15 |
Philadelphia Union II |
16 | 56% | 38% | 13% |
| 16 |
Rio Grande Valley |
14 | 64% | 50% | 14% |
| 17 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 82% | 41% | 24% |
| 18 |
Charlotte Independence |
17 | 71% | 29% | 24% |
| 19 |
New York RB II |
16 | 69% | 44% | 13% |
| 20 |
Colorado Springs |
16 | 63% | 38% | 13% |
| 21 |
Louisville City |
19 | 63% | 21% | 11% |
| 22 |
Real Monarchs |
16 | 81% | 25% | 13% |
| 23 |
Saint Louis |
18 | 78% | 39% | 28% |
| 24 |
Portland Timbers II |
16 | 56% | 38% | 19% |
| 25 |
Orange County SC |
16 | 100% | 75% | 19% |
| 26 |
San Antonio |
17 | 94% | 71% | 47% |
| 27 |
Sporting KC II |
16 | 75% | 13% | 6% |
| 28 |
New Mexico United |
17 | 76% | 53% | 24% |
| 29 |
Memphis 901 |
15 | 80% | 33% | 7% |
| 30 |
Loudoun United |
13 | 69% | 46% | 15% |
| 31 |
Hartford Athletic |
17 | 47% | 18% | 6% |
| 32 |
Birmingham Legion |
17 | 41% | 29% | 12% |
| 33 |
El Paso Locomotive |
19 | 89% | 47% | 32% |
| 34 |
Austin Bold |
16 | 69% | 31% | 19% |
| 35 |
San Diego Loyal |
16 | 69% | 25% | 25% |
Check out all the card statistics for Phoenix Rising vs San Diego Loyal here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Phoenix Rising has played 19 matches in the USL Championship and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 68% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 47% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 11% of matches.
- Meanwhile, San Diego Loyal has, in 16 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 81% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 69% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 31% of matches.
Card statistics for Phoenix Rising vs San Diego Loyal bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the USL Championship, just check out the table above.