Phoenix Rising vs El Paso Locomotive
30.08.2025 - 22:30
Stadium: Phoenix Rising Soccer Complex
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
14 | 67% |
| 2 |
North Carolina FC |
13 | 65% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
12 | 63% |
| 4 |
Indy Eleven |
12 | 60% |
| 5 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 57% |
| 6 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 55% |
| 7 |
Sacramento Republic |
11 | 55% |
| 8 |
Orange County |
10 | 53% |
| 9 |
Miami FC II |
11 | 52% |
| 10 |
Phoenix Rising |
11 | 52% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
| 12 |
Detroit City FC |
10 | 48% |
| 13 |
Colorado Springs |
9 | 45% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
9 | 45% |
| 15 |
Oakland Roots |
9 | 45% |
| 16 |
Lexington |
9 | 43% |
| 17 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 43% |
| 18 |
Hartford Athletic |
8 | 40% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
8 | 36% |
| 20 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 30% |
| 21 |
Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 29% |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 29% |
| 23 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 25% |
| 24 |
Birmingham Legion |
5 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
9 | 90% |
| 2 |
Orange County |
7 | 78% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
| 4 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 67% |
| 5 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 67% |
| 6 |
Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
| 7 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
| 8 |
Colorado Springs |
5 | 63% |
| 9 |
El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
| 10 |
Phoenix Rising |
5 | 56% |
| 11 |
Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
| 12 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 55% |
| 13 |
San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
| 14 |
Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
| 15 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 45% |
| 16 |
Lexington |
5 | 45% |
| 17 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 42% |
| 18 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 42% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
3 | 30% |
| 21 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
| 22 |
Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
| 23 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 25% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
2 | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
7 | 70% |
| 2 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 70% |
| 3 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
| 4 |
Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 56% |
| 6 |
Miami FC II |
5 | 56% |
| 7 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 55% |
| 8 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
| 9 |
Charleston Battery |
5 | 45% |
| 10 |
North Carolina FC |
4 | 40% |
| 11 |
Lexington |
4 | 40% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
| 13 |
Hartford Athletic |
3 | 38% |
| 14 |
Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
| 15 |
San Antonio |
3 | 33% |
| 16 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
| 17 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 33% |
| 18 |
Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
| 19 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
| 20 |
Orange County |
3 | 30% |
| 21 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
| 22 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
| 23 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 20% |
| 24 |
Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Birmingham Legion |
16 | 76% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
15 | 75% |
| 3 |
Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 71% |
| 4 |
Rhode Island |
15 | 71% |
| 5 |
Loudoun United |
14 | 70% |
| 6 |
Monterey Bay |
14 | 63% |
| 7 |
Hartford Athletic |
12 | 60% |
| 8 |
Lexington |
12 | 57% |
| 9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 57% |
| 10 |
San Antonio |
11 | 55% |
| 11 |
Oakland Roots |
11 | 55% |
| 12 |
Colorado Springs |
11 | 55% |
| 13 |
Detroit City FC |
11 | 52% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
| 15 |
Miami FC II |
10 | 47% |
| 16 |
Phoenix Rising |
10 | 47% |
| 17 |
Orange County |
9 | 47% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 45% |
| 19 |
Sacramento Republic |
9 | 45% |
| 20 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 42% |
| 21 |
Indy Eleven |
8 | 40% |
| 22 |
New Mexico United |
7 | 36% |
| 23 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 35% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
7 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Rhode Island |
8 | 80% |
| 2 |
Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
| 3 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
6 | 75% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
| 5 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 70% |
| 6 |
Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
| 7 |
Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 58% |
| 8 |
Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
| 9 |
Lexington |
6 | 54% |
| 10 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 54% |
| 11 |
Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
| 12 |
Indy Eleven |
5 | 45% |
| 13 |
San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
| 14 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
| 15 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 44% |
| 16 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
| 17 |
Colorado Springs |
3 | 37% |
| 18 |
Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
| 19 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
| 20 |
Charleston Battery |
3 | 33% |
| 21 |
Detroit City FC |
3 | 33% |
| 22 |
New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
| 23 |
Orange County |
2 | 22% |
| 24 |
North Carolina FC |
1 | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 88% |
| 2 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 80% |
| 3 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
| 5 |
Orange County |
7 | 70% |
| 6 |
Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
| 7 |
Monterey Bay |
8 | 66% |
| 8 |
Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
| 9 |
San Antonio |
6 | 66% |
| 10 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
| 11 |
Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
| 12 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 62% |
| 13 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 60% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
| 15 |
Lexington |
6 | 60% |
| 16 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 54% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
| 18 |
New Mexico United |
5 | 45% |
| 19 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 44% |
| 20 |
Miami FC II |
4 | 44% |
| 21 |
Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
| 22 |
Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
| 23 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 30% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
3 | 30% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Phoenix Rising and El Paso Locomotive in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Phoenix Rising has come out and scored the first goal in 52% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 47% of matches.
Meanwhile, El Paso Locomotive comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 50% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 50% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.