Phoenix Rising 3 - 3 Birmingham Legion
02.08.2025 - 22:30
Stadium: Phoenix Rising Soccer Complex
Finished
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
14 | 67% |
| 2 |
North Carolina FC |
13 | 65% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
12 | 63% |
| 4 |
Indy Eleven |
12 | 60% |
| 5 |
Charleston Battery |
12 | 57% |
| 6 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 57% |
| 7 |
Sacramento Republic |
11 | 55% |
| 8 |
Orange County |
10 | 53% |
| 9 |
Phoenix Rising |
11 | 52% |
| 10 |
Miami FC II |
11 | 52% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
| 12 |
Detroit City FC |
10 | 48% |
| 13 |
Colorado Springs |
9 | 45% |
| 14 |
Oakland Roots |
9 | 45% |
| 15 |
San Antonio |
9 | 45% |
| 16 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 43% |
| 17 |
Lexington |
9 | 43% |
| 18 |
Hartford Athletic |
8 | 40% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
8 | 36% |
| 20 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 29% |
| 21 |
Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 29% |
| 22 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 29% |
| 23 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 25% |
| 24 |
Birmingham Legion |
5 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
9 | 90% |
| 2 |
Orange County |
7 | 78% |
| 3 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
| 4 |
Charleston Battery |
7 | 70% |
| 5 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 67% |
| 6 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
| 7 |
Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
| 8 |
Colorado Springs |
5 | 63% |
| 9 |
El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
| 10 |
Phoenix Rising |
5 | 56% |
| 11 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 55% |
| 12 |
Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
| 13 |
San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
| 14 |
Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
| 15 |
Lexington |
5 | 45% |
| 16 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 45% |
| 17 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 42% |
| 18 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 42% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
3 | 30% |
| 21 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
| 22 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 25% |
| 23 |
Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
2 | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 70% |
| 2 |
Louisville City |
7 | 70% |
| 3 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
| 4 |
Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
| 5 |
Miami FC II |
5 | 56% |
| 6 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 56% |
| 7 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 55% |
| 8 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
| 9 |
Charleston Battery |
5 | 45% |
| 10 |
North Carolina FC |
4 | 40% |
| 11 |
Lexington |
4 | 40% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
| 13 |
Hartford Athletic |
3 | 38% |
| 14 |
Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
| 15 |
San Antonio |
3 | 33% |
| 16 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
| 17 |
Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
| 18 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 33% |
| 19 |
Orange County |
3 | 30% |
| 20 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 27% |
| 21 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
| 22 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
| 23 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 20% |
| 24 |
Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Birmingham Legion |
16 | 76% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
15 | 75% |
| 3 |
Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 71% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
15 | 71% |
| 5 |
Rhode Island |
15 | 71% |
| 6 |
Monterey Bay |
14 | 63% |
| 7 |
Hartford Athletic |
12 | 60% |
| 8 |
Lexington |
12 | 57% |
| 9 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 57% |
| 10 |
Colorado Springs |
11 | 55% |
| 11 |
Oakland Roots |
11 | 55% |
| 12 |
San Antonio |
11 | 55% |
| 13 |
Detroit City FC |
11 | 52% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
| 15 |
Orange County |
9 | 47% |
| 16 |
Miami FC II |
10 | 47% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
10 | 47% |
| 18 |
Sacramento Republic |
9 | 45% |
| 19 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 42% |
| 20 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 42% |
| 21 |
Indy Eleven |
8 | 40% |
| 22 |
New Mexico United |
7 | 36% |
| 23 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 35% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
7 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Rhode Island |
8 | 80% |
| 2 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
6 | 75% |
| 3 |
Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
| 4 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 70% |
| 5 |
Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
| 6 |
Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
| 7 |
Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
| 8 |
Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 58% |
| 9 |
Lexington |
6 | 54% |
| 10 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 54% |
| 11 |
Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
| 12 |
Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
| 13 |
Indy Eleven |
5 | 45% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
| 15 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 44% |
| 16 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
| 17 |
Colorado Springs |
3 | 37% |
| 18 |
Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
| 19 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
| 20 |
Detroit City FC |
3 | 33% |
| 21 |
Charleston Battery |
3 | 30% |
| 22 |
New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
| 23 |
Orange County |
2 | 22% |
| 24 |
North Carolina FC |
1 | 10% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 88% |
| 2 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 80% |
| 3 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
| 5 |
Loudoun United |
8 | 72% |
| 6 |
Orange County |
7 | 70% |
| 7 |
Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
| 8 |
San Antonio |
6 | 66% |
| 9 |
Monterey Bay |
8 | 66% |
| 10 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
| 11 |
Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
| 12 |
Hartford Athletic |
5 | 62% |
| 13 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 60% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
| 15 |
Lexington |
6 | 60% |
| 16 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 54% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
| 18 |
New Mexico United |
5 | 45% |
| 19 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 44% |
| 20 |
Miami FC II |
4 | 44% |
| 21 |
Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
| 22 |
Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
| 23 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 30% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
3 | 30% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Phoenix Rising and Birmingham Legion in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Phoenix Rising has come out and scored the first goal in 52% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 47% of matches.
Meanwhile, Birmingham Legion comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 24% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 76% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.