Parnahyba 2 - 1 Fluminense PI
21.05.2023 - 16:00
Stadium: Estádio Municipal Pedro Alelaf
Finished
Clean Sheet
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Operário MT |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 2 |
Camboriú |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 3 |
Independiente FSJ |
14 | 5 | 36% |
| 4 |
Cascavel FC |
14 | 2 | 14% |
| 5 |
Retrô |
18 | 4 | 22% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
16 | 10 | 63% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
14 | 6 | 43% |
| 8 |
Brasiliense |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 9 |
Santa Cruz |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 10 |
ASA |
16 | 5 | 31% |
| 11 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 12 |
Caxias |
22 | 9 | 41% |
| 13 |
Ceilândia |
18 | 13 | 72% |
| 14 |
Campinense |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 15 |
Maranhão |
20 | 8 | 40% |
| 16 |
Globo |
14 | 1 | 7% |
| 17 |
Parnahyba |
16 | 3 | 19% |
| 18 |
Tocantinópolis |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 19 |
Resende |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 20 |
Concórdia AC |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 21 |
Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) |
16 | 4 | 25% |
| 22 |
Interporto |
14 | 3 | 21% |
| 23 |
Potiguar Parnamirim |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Tuna Luso |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 25 |
Democrata GV |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| 26 |
Nacional de Patos |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 27 |
Atlético Alagoinhas |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 28 |
Patrocinense |
18 | 8 | 44% |
| 29 |
Hercílio Luz |
16 | 9 | 56% |
| 30 |
Caucaia |
14 | 2 | 14% |
| 31 |
Pacajus |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 32 |
Fluminense PI |
14 | 2 | 14% |
| 33 |
Falcon |
16 | 2 | 13% |
| 34 |
Cruzeiro de Arapiraca |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 35 |
Jacuipense |
14 | 2 | 14% |
| 36 |
Ferroviária |
24 | 11 | 46% |
| 37 |
Santo André |
14 | 6 | 43% |
| 38 |
Noroeste |
14 | 2 | 14% |
| 39 |
Real Ariquemes |
14 | 1 | 7% |
| 40 |
Bahia de Feira |
20 | 9 | 45% |
| 41 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
16 | 6 | 38% |
| 42 |
Portuguesa RJ |
20 | 8 | 40% |
| 43 |
União Rondonópolis |
14 | 9 | 64% |
| 44 |
Sousa |
20 | 2 | 10% |
| 45 |
Atlético Cearense |
18 | 4 | 22% |
| 46 |
Maringá |
16 | 8 | 50% |
| 47 |
Nacional AM |
18 | 9 | 50% |
| 48 |
Ferroviário |
24 | 12 | 50% |
| 49 |
Iporá |
14 | 4 | 29% |
| 50 |
CEOV Operário |
16 | 7 | 44% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Operário MT |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 2 |
Camboriú |
9 | 5 | 56% |
| 3 |
Independiente FSJ |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 4 |
Cascavel FC |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 5 |
Retrô |
9 | 1 | 11% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 8 |
Brasiliense |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 9 |
Santa Cruz |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 10 |
ASA |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 11 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 12 |
Caxias |
11 | 4 | 36% |
| 13 |
Ceilândia |
9 | 7 | 78% |
| 14 |
Campinense |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 15 |
Maranhão |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 16 |
Globo |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 17 |
Parnahyba |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 18 |
Tocantinópolis |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 19 |
Resende |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 20 |
Concórdia AC |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 21 |
Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 22 |
Interporto |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 23 |
Potiguar Parnamirim |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Tuna Luso |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 25 |
Democrata GV |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 26 |
Nacional de Patos |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 27 |
Atlético Alagoinhas |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 28 |
Patrocinense |
9 | 7 | 78% |
| 29 |
Hercílio Luz |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 30 |
Caucaia |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 31 |
Pacajus |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 32 |
Fluminense PI |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 33 |
Falcon |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 34 |
Cruzeiro de Arapiraca |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 35 |
Jacuipense |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 36 |
Ferroviária |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 37 |
Santo André |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 38 |
Noroeste |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 39 |
Real Ariquemes |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 40 |
Bahia de Feira |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 41 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 42 |
Portuguesa RJ |
10 | 3 | 30% |
| 43 |
União Rondonópolis |
7 | 7 | 100% |
| 44 |
Sousa |
10 | 2 | 20% |
| 45 |
Atlético Cearense |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 46 |
Maringá |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 47 |
Nacional AM |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 48 |
Ferroviário |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 49 |
Iporá |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 50 |
CEOV Operário |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Operário MT |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 2 |
Camboriú |
9 | 2 | 22% |
| 3 |
Independiente FSJ |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 4 |
Cascavel FC |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 5 |
Retrô |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 6 |
Águia de Marabá |
8 | 6 | 75% |
| 7 |
CRAC |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 8 |
Brasiliense |
8 | 5 | 63% |
| 9 |
Santa Cruz |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 10 |
ASA |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 11 |
Brasil de Pelotas |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 12 |
Caxias |
11 | 5 | 45% |
| 13 |
Ceilândia |
9 | 6 | 67% |
| 14 |
Campinense |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 15 |
Maranhão |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 16 |
Globo |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
Parnahyba |
8 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 |
Tocantinópolis |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 19 |
Resende |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 20 |
Concórdia AC |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 21 |
Vitória Futebol Clube (ES) |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 22 |
Interporto |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 23 |
Potiguar Parnamirim |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Tuna Luso |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 25 |
Democrata GV |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 26 |
Nacional de Patos |
9 | 2 | 22% |
| 27 |
Atlético Alagoinhas |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 28 |
Patrocinense |
9 | 1 | 11% |
| 29 |
Hercílio Luz |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 30 |
Caucaia |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Pacajus |
8 | 2 | 25% |
| 32 |
Fluminense PI |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |
Falcon |
8 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Cruzeiro de Arapiraca |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 35 |
Jacuipense |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Ferroviária |
12 | 4 | 33% |
| 37 |
Santo André |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 38 |
Noroeste |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Real Ariquemes |
7 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Bahia de Feira |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 41 |
Potiguar Mossoró |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 42 |
Portuguesa RJ |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 43 |
União Rondonópolis |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 44 |
Sousa |
10 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Atlético Cearense |
9 | 1 | 11% |
| 46 |
Maringá |
8 | 3 | 38% |
| 47 |
Nacional AM |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 48 |
Ferroviário |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 49 |
Iporá |
7 | 1 | 14% |
| 50 |
CEOV Operário |
8 | 4 | 50% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Parnahyba vs Fluminense PI:
- Parnahyba has played 16 matches and kept opponents from scoring a single goal in 3 of them. In other words, they have kept a clean sheet in 19% of their matches.
- In 8 home matches in the Serie D, Parnahyba has had 3 matches without conceding a goal. Fluminense PI has played 16 matches and has shut out opponents on 2 occasions. That means they have held clean sheets in 14% of their matches.
- In 7 home matches played in the Serie D, Fluminense PI has had 0 matches without conceding a single goal. And away from home, they have a 0% clean sheet rate as the visiting side.
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.