North Carolina FC 0 - 0 Charleston Battery
09.03.2024 - 19:00
Stadium: Sahlen's Stadium at WakeMed Soccer Park
Finished
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Colorado Springs |
26 | 68% |
| 2 |
Louisville City |
23 | 64% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
21 | 60% |
| 4 |
Sacramento Republic |
21 | 60% |
| 5 |
New Mexico United |
20 | 56% |
| 6 |
Rhode Island |
20 | 53% |
| 7 |
North Carolina FC |
18 | 51% |
| 8 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
17 | 49% |
| 9 |
Memphis 901 |
17 | 49% |
| 10 |
Orange County SC |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Indy Eleven |
16 | 46% |
| 12 |
Charleston Battery |
17 | 46% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 44% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
15 | 44% |
| 15 |
Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 41% |
| 16 |
El Paso Locomotive |
14 | 41% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
14 | 40% |
| 18 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 38% |
| 19 |
Birmingham Legion |
12 | 35% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
12 | 34% |
| 21 |
Hartford Athletic |
11 | 32% |
| 22 |
Loudoun United |
11 | 32% |
| 23 |
Miami FC II |
32 | 31% |
| 24 |
Monterey Bay |
10 | 29% |
| 25 |
Miami FC |
10 | 29% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Colorado Springs |
15 | 71% |
| 2 |
New Mexico United |
13 | 68% |
| 3 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 65% |
| 4 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
10 | 59% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
10 | 59% |
| 6 |
Louisville City |
11 | 58% |
| 7 |
Detroit City FC |
10 | 56% |
| 8 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 55% |
| 9 |
Orange County SC |
9 | 53% |
| 10 |
San Antonio |
9 | 53% |
| 11 |
Indy Eleven |
9 | 50% |
| 12 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 50% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 47% |
| 14 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 47% |
| 15 |
Hartford Athletic |
7 | 41% |
| 16 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 41% |
| 17 |
El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 41% |
| 18 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 35% |
| 19 |
Monterey Bay |
6 | 35% |
| 20 |
Miami FC |
5 | 29% |
| 21 |
Birmingham Legion |
5 | 29% |
| 22 |
Oakland Roots |
5 | 29% |
| 23 |
Miami FC II |
17 | 29% |
| 24 |
Loudoun United |
5 | 29% |
| 25 |
Las Vegas Lights |
4 | 22% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Louisville City |
12 | 71% |
| 2 |
Rhode Island |
14 | 67% |
| 3 |
Colorado Springs |
11 | 65% |
| 4 |
Detroit City FC |
11 | 65% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
11 | 61% |
| 6 |
Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 58% |
| 7 |
Memphis 901 |
8 | 47% |
| 8 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 42% |
| 9 |
Orange County SC |
8 | 42% |
| 10 |
New Mexico United |
7 | 41% |
| 11 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 41% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 41% |
| 13 |
Indy Eleven |
7 | 41% |
| 14 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 39% |
| 15 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 39% |
| 16 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 39% |
| 17 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 35% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
6 | 35% |
| 19 |
San Antonio |
6 | 35% |
| 20 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 35% |
| 21 |
Phoenix Rising |
6 | 33% |
| 22 |
Miami FC II |
15 | 33% |
| 23 |
Miami FC |
5 | 29% |
| 24 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 24% |
| 25 |
Hartford Athletic |
4 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Monterey Bay |
24 | 70% |
| 2 |
Miami FC |
24 | 70% |
| 3 |
Miami FC II |
32 | 69% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
23 | 67% |
| 5 |
Hartford Athletic |
23 | 67% |
| 6 |
Oakland Roots |
23 | 65% |
| 7 |
Birmingham Legion |
22 | 64% |
| 8 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
21 | 61% |
| 9 |
Phoenix Rising |
21 | 60% |
| 10 |
Las Vegas Lights |
22 | 59% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
20 | 58% |
| 12 |
San Antonio |
19 | 55% |
| 13 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 55% |
| 14 |
Indy Eleven |
19 | 54% |
| 15 |
Charleston Battery |
20 | 54% |
| 16 |
Orange County SC |
19 | 52% |
| 17 |
Memphis 901 |
18 | 51% |
| 18 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
18 | 51% |
| 19 |
North Carolina FC |
17 | 48% |
| 20 |
Rhode Island |
18 | 47% |
| 21 |
New Mexico United |
16 | 44% |
| 22 |
Detroit City FC |
14 | 40% |
| 23 |
Sacramento Republic |
14 | 40% |
| 24 |
Louisville City |
13 | 36% |
| 25 |
Colorado Springs |
12 | 31% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Las Vegas Lights |
14 | 77% |
| 2 |
Miami FC II |
17 | 71% |
| 3 |
Oakland Roots |
12 | 70% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
12 | 70% |
| 5 |
Birmingham Legion |
12 | 70% |
| 6 |
Miami FC |
12 | 70% |
| 7 |
Rhode Island |
11 | 64% |
| 8 |
Monterey Bay |
11 | 64% |
| 9 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
10 | 58% |
| 10 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 58% |
| 11 |
Hartford Athletic |
10 | 58% |
| 12 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 52% |
| 13 |
Phoenix Rising |
9 | 52% |
| 14 |
Indy Eleven |
9 | 50% |
| 15 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 50% |
| 16 |
Orange County SC |
8 | 47% |
| 17 |
San Antonio |
8 | 47% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 45% |
| 19 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 44% |
| 20 |
Louisville City |
8 | 42% |
| 21 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 41% |
| 22 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 41% |
| 23 |
North Carolina FC |
6 | 35% |
| 24 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 31% |
| 25 |
Colorado Springs |
6 | 28% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hartford Athletic |
13 | 76% |
| 2 |
Monterey Bay |
13 | 76% |
| 3 |
Miami FC |
12 | 70% |
| 4 |
Miami FC II |
15 | 67% |
| 5 |
Phoenix Rising |
12 | 66% |
| 6 |
San Antonio |
11 | 64% |
| 7 |
Charleston Battery |
11 | 64% |
| 8 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 64% |
| 9 |
Loudoun United |
11 | 64% |
| 10 |
North Carolina FC |
11 | 61% |
| 11 |
Oakland Roots |
11 | 61% |
| 12 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 61% |
| 13 |
Indy Eleven |
10 | 58% |
| 14 |
El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 58% |
| 15 |
Birmingham Legion |
10 | 58% |
| 16 |
New Mexico United |
10 | 58% |
| 17 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 57% |
| 18 |
Orange County SC |
11 | 57% |
| 19 |
Memphis 901 |
9 | 52% |
| 20 |
Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 42% |
| 21 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 38% |
| 22 |
Colorado Springs |
6 | 35% |
| 23 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 35% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
7 | 33% |
| 25 |
Louisville City |
5 | 29% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from North Carolina FC and Charleston Battery in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
North Carolina FC has come out and scored the first goal in 51% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 48% of matches.
Meanwhile, Charleston Battery comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 46% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 54% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.