Nanjing City 1 - 2 Heilongjiang Lava Spring
04.11.2022 - 02:30
Stadium: Jiangning Sports Center
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
34 | 21 | 62% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
34 | 12 | 35% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
34 | 18 | 53% |
| 4 |
BIT |
34 | 12 | 35% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
34 | 22 | 65% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
34 | 20 | 59% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
34 | 17 | 50% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
34 | 18 | 53% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
34 | 15 | 44% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
34 | 17 | 50% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
34 | 17 | 50% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
34 | 8 | 24% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
34 | 16 | 47% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
34 | 18 | 53% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
34 | 20 | 59% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Xinjiang Tianshan |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 2 |
Beijing BG |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 3 |
Qingdao Jonoon |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 4 |
BIT |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 5 |
Jiangxi Liansheng |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Chang'an |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 8 |
Nantong Zhiyun |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 9 |
Zibo Cuju |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 10 |
Guangxi Baoyun |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 14 |
Sichuan Jiuniu |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 15 |
Kunshan |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 16 |
Nanjing City |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 17 |
Qingdao Youth Island |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 18 |
Hebei Kungfu |
17 | 7 | 41% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Nanjing City and Heilongjiang Lava Spring have both scored and conceded in the same match in the China League One.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 34 matches played in the China League One, Nanjing City has scored and conceded goals in 18 matches. In other words, 53% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 65% at home, while it is 41% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Heilongjiang Lava Spring has scored and conceded in 20 of their 34 matches so far in the China League One, giving them a BTTS rate of 59%. Both teams have scored in 9 of Heilongjiang Lava Spring’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 11 times in 17 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets