Myanmar W 4 - 1 Hong Kong W
23.10.2024 - 05:00
Stadium: Thuwanna YTC Stadium
Finished
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gibraltar W |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 2 |
Georgia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Uruguay W |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 5 |
Ecuador W |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| 6 |
Liechtenstein W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 7 |
Wales W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 9 |
Faroe Islands W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Poland W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 11 |
Philippines Women |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 12 |
Finland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
New Zealand Women |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 14 |
Lebanon W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Syria W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 16 |
Mexico W |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 17 |
Colombia Women |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 18 |
North Macedonia W |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 19 |
Paraguay W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 20 |
Turkey W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |
Romania W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 22 |
Cayman Islands W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Burkina Faso W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
United States Women |
9 | 3 | 33% |
| 25 |
Tunisia W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 26 |
Canada Women |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 27 |
Brazil Women |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 28 |
Uzbekistan W |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
South Africa Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 30 |
Taiwan W |
8 | 4 | 50% |
| 31 |
Congo DR W |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 32 |
El Salvador W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 33 |
South Sudan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 34 |
Mali W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 35 |
Palestine W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 36 |
Myanmar W |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 37 |
Belize W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Bermuda W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Macao W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Iceland W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 41 |
Jamaica Women |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 42 |
Chile Women |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 43 |
UAE W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Curaçao W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 45 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Malta W |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 47 |
Switzerland Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 48 |
Albania W |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 49 |
Bolivia W |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 50 |
Australia Women |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gibraltar W |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 2 |
Georgia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Uruguay W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 5 |
Ecuador W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 |
Liechtenstein W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 |
Wales W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Faroe Islands W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Poland W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 11 |
Philippines Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 12 |
Finland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
New Zealand Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 14 |
Lebanon W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Syria W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Mexico W |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 17 |
Colombia Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
North Macedonia W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 19 |
Paraguay W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Turkey W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |
Romania W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |
Cayman Islands W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Burkina Faso W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
United States Women |
7 | 2 | 29% |
| 25 |
Tunisia W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 26 |
Canada Women |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 27 |
Brazil Women |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 28 |
Uzbekistan W |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
South Africa Women |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Taiwan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 31 |
Congo DR W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 32 |
El Salvador W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
South Sudan W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Mali W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Palestine W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Myanmar W |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 37 |
Belize W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Bermuda W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Macao W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Iceland W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Jamaica Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 42 |
Chile Women |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 43 |
UAE W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Curaçao W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 45 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Malta W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 47 |
Switzerland Women |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 48 |
Albania W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Bolivia W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 50 |
Australia Women |
7 | 5 | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gibraltar W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Georgia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 3 |
Maldives W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Uruguay W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 5 |
Ecuador W |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 6 |
Liechtenstein W |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 7 |
Wales W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Greece W |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 9 |
Faroe Islands W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Poland W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Philippines Women |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 12 |
Finland W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 |
New Zealand Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Lebanon W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 |
Syria W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 16 |
Mexico W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 17 |
Colombia Women |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 18 |
North Macedonia W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Paraguay W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 |
Turkey W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Romania W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Cayman Islands W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Burkina Faso W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
United States Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 25 |
Tunisia W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Canada Women |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 27 |
Brazil Women |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 28 |
Uzbekistan W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
South Africa Women |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 30 |
Taiwan W |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 31 |
Congo DR W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 32 |
El Salvador W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
South Sudan W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 34 |
Mali W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 35 |
Palestine W |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 36 |
Myanmar W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Belize W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Bermuda W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Macao W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Iceland W |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 41 |
Jamaica Women |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 42 |
Chile Women |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 43 |
UAE W |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Curaçao W |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Republic of Ireland Women |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
Malta W |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Switzerland Women |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Albania W |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 49 |
Bolivia W |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 50 |
Australia Women |
3 | 2 | 67% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Myanmar W and Hong Kong W have both scored and conceded in the same match in the International Friendlies Women.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
- In 4 matches played in the International Friendlies Women, Myanmar W has scored and conceded goals in 4 matches. In other words, 100% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 100% at home, while it is 0% away from home.
- Meanwhile, Hong Kong W has scored and conceded in 4 of their 4 matches so far in the International Friendlies Women, giving them a BTTS rate of 100%. Both teams have scored in 2 of Hong Kong W’s 2 home matches, and it has happened 2 times in 2 matches as the away side.
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets