# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 69% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 59% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
14 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
13 | 45% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 41% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 38% |
19 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 38% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 53% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 29% |
21 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 29% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
23 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
21 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() San Antonio |
18 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
18 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Loudoun United |
18 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
18 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
17 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 55% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 51% |
15 |
![]() Orange County |
15 | 51% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 42% |
22 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
12 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
9 | 31% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 46% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 85% |
2 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 60% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
22 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
23 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 42% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
5 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Monterey Bay and Oakland Roots in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Monterey Bay has come out and scored the first goal in 38% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 62% of matches.
Meanwhile, Oakland Roots comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 50% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 50% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.