# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
18 | 69% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
15 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
15 | 58% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
15 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
14 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
12 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
12 | 46% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 44% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 42% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
11 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 41% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
10 | 38% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
8 | 30% |
23 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
7 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Orange County |
8 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 67% |
5 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
7 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 58% |
4 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
5 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 54% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 46% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 46% |
10 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 46% |
11 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 42% |
13 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 38% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 36% |
18 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 31% |
20 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 31% |
21 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 31% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 29% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 8% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
19 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
19 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
16 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
16 | 61% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
16 | 59% |
7 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
15 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
15 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
15 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
15 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
15 | 57% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
14 | 56% |
13 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
14 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
14 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
13 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 46% |
19 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
11 | 42% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
11 | 42% |
21 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 42% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
10 | 38% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 34% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 30% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Rhode Island |
9 | 69% |
4 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 61% |
6 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 61% |
7 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 50% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
4 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
2 | 15% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
11 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 69% |
7 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 63% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 61% |
11 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 61% |
13 |
![]() Miami FC II |
7 | 58% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 53% |
16 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 53% |
18 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 46% |
20 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
21 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 41% |
22 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Miami FC II and Rhode Island in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Miami FC II has come out and scored the first goal in 42% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 57% of matches.
Meanwhile, Rhode Island comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 38% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 61% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.