Maccabi Umm Al Fahm 0 - 7 Hapoel Afula
17.03.2014 - 13:00
Stadium: Umm al-Fahm Municipal Stadium
Finished
Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Maccabi Netanya |
37 | 76% | 57% | 41% |
| 2 |
Hapoel Ashkelon |
37 | 76% | 57% | 41% |
| 3 |
Hapoel Petah Tikva |
37 | 76% | 62% | 43% |
| 4 |
Hapoel Ramat Gan |
37 | 70% | 49% | 30% |
| 5 |
Hapoel Rishon LeZion |
37 | 70% | 57% | 35% |
| 6 |
Maccabi Ahi Nazareth |
37 | 76% | 57% | 35% |
| 7 |
Maccabi Herzliya |
37 | 70% | 49% | 30% |
| 8 |
Hapoel Nazareth Illit |
37 | 68% | 54% | 43% |
| 9 |
Beitar Tel Aviv Ramla |
37 | 73% | 46% | 27% |
| 10 |
Hapoel Afula |
37 | 73% | 54% | 46% |
| 11 |
Hapoel Bnei Lod |
37 | 73% | 70% | 54% |
| 12 |
Hapoel Katamon |
37 | 59% | 41% | 30% |
| 13 |
Hapoel Jerusalem |
37 | 73% | 62% | 46% |
| 14 |
Maccabi Yavne |
37 | 68% | 54% | 32% |
| 15 |
Hakoah Ramat Gan |
37 | 73% | 51% | 30% |
| 16 |
Maccabi Umm Al Fahm |
37 | 51% | 35% | 16% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Maccabi Netanya |
37 | 65% | 35% | 16% |
| 2 |
Hapoel Ashkelon |
37 | 65% | 38% | 22% |
| 3 |
Hapoel Petah Tikva |
37 | 70% | 51% | 30% |
| 4 |
Hapoel Ramat Gan |
37 | 59% | 19% | 5% |
| 5 |
Hapoel Rishon LeZion |
37 | 57% | 38% | 14% |
| 6 |
Maccabi Ahi Nazareth |
37 | 68% | 46% | 30% |
| 7 |
Maccabi Herzliya |
37 | 70% | 46% | 19% |
| 8 |
Hapoel Nazareth Illit |
37 | 73% | 43% | 24% |
| 9 |
Beitar Tel Aviv Ramla |
37 | 65% | 38% | 16% |
| 10 |
Hapoel Afula |
37 | 68% | 46% | 27% |
| 11 |
Hapoel Bnei Lod |
37 | 70% | 59% | 38% |
| 12 |
Hapoel Katamon |
37 | 68% | 38% | 19% |
| 13 |
Hapoel Jerusalem |
37 | 76% | 49% | 27% |
| 14 |
Maccabi Yavne |
37 | 68% | 49% | 22% |
| 15 |
Hakoah Ramat Gan |
37 | 73% | 54% | 24% |
| 16 |
Maccabi Umm Al Fahm |
37 | 59% | 41% | 16% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Maccabi Netanya |
37 | 76% | 51% | 24% |
| 2 |
Hapoel Ashkelon |
37 | 84% | 51% | 19% |
| 3 |
Hapoel Petah Tikva |
37 | 73% | 51% | 27% |
| 4 |
Hapoel Ramat Gan |
37 | 68% | 54% | 30% |
| 5 |
Hapoel Rishon LeZion |
37 | 73% | 49% | 30% |
| 6 |
Maccabi Ahi Nazareth |
37 | 78% | 41% | 22% |
| 7 |
Maccabi Herzliya |
37 | 59% | 38% | 19% |
| 8 |
Hapoel Nazareth Illit |
37 | 78% | 49% | 22% |
| 9 |
Beitar Tel Aviv Ramla |
37 | 57% | 32% | 16% |
| 10 |
Hapoel Afula |
37 | 68% | 46% | 32% |
| 11 |
Hapoel Bnei Lod |
37 | 73% | 46% | 24% |
| 12 |
Hapoel Katamon |
37 | 57% | 38% | 16% |
| 13 |
Hapoel Jerusalem |
37 | 73% | 54% | 30% |
| 14 |
Maccabi Yavne |
37 | 62% | 41% | 16% |
| 15 |
Hakoah Ramat Gan |
37 | 49% | 32% | 19% |
| 16 |
Maccabi Umm Al Fahm |
37 | 46% | 16% | 3% |
Check out all the card statistics for Maccabi Umm Al Fahm vs Hapoel Afula here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
- Maccabi Umm Al Fahm has played 37 matches in the Liga Leumit and has received more than 1.5 cards (yellow and red) in 59% of those matches. They have also received over 2.5 bookings in 41% of matches and over 3.5 cards in 16% of matches.
- Meanwhile, Hapoel Afula has, in 37 matches to date, had more than 1.5 bookings in 68% of their matches. They have had over 2.5 cards in 46% of matches and have seen more than 3.5 cards in 27% of matches.
Card statistics for Maccabi Umm Al Fahm vs Hapoel Afula bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Liga Leumit, just check out the table above.