# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 59% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
15 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
13 | 46% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 45% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
13 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 41% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 39% |
18 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 39% |
19 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 39% |
20 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 38% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 32% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 69% |
5 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 46% |
16 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
4 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 40% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 38% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 29% |
21 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 29% |
22 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
21 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
19 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Rhode Island |
18 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
18 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
17 | 60% |
7 |
![]() San Antonio |
17 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
17 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 55% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 46% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 42% |
22 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
12 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
7 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() Orange County |
4 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 61% |
12 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 60% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 57% |
17 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
20 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
22 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 46% |
23 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 42% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Loudoun United and Lexington in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Loudoun United has come out and scored the first goal in 38% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 62% of matches.
Meanwhile, Lexington comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 41% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 58% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.