Lexington vs Phoenix Rising
09.08.2025 - 18:00
Match Scoring / Conceding First
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New Mexico United |
12 | 80% |
| 2 |
Indy Eleven |
11 | 73% |
| 3 |
Louisville City |
11 | 69% |
| 4 |
Miami FC II |
10 | 67% |
| 5 |
North Carolina FC |
10 | 67% |
| 6 |
Charleston Battery |
9 | 53% |
| 7 |
Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
| 8 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 50% |
| 9 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 50% |
| 10 |
San Antonio |
8 | 50% |
| 11 |
El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 50% |
| 12 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
| 13 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 47% |
| 14 |
Lexington |
7 | 44% |
| 15 |
Orange County SC |
6 | 43% |
| 16 |
Colorado Springs |
6 | 40% |
| 17 |
Monterey Bay |
7 | 39% |
| 18 |
Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 38% |
| 19 |
Oakland Roots |
6 | 38% |
| 20 |
Rhode Island |
5 | 31% |
| 21 |
Loudoun United |
5 | 31% |
| 22 |
Hartford Athletic |
4 | 29% |
| 23 |
Birmingham Legion |
4 | 24% |
| 24 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 19% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
North Carolina FC |
7 | 100% |
| 2 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 86% |
| 3 |
Orange County SC |
5 | 71% |
| 4 |
Louisville City |
5 | 71% |
| 5 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 71% |
| 6 |
Miami FC II |
7 | 70% |
| 7 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 67% |
| 8 |
Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
| 9 |
San Antonio |
6 | 67% |
| 10 |
Colorado Springs |
4 | 67% |
| 11 |
Charleston Battery |
5 | 63% |
| 12 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 57% |
| 13 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 50% |
| 14 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
| 15 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
| 16 |
Lexington |
4 | 44% |
| 17 |
Phoenix Rising |
3 | 43% |
| 18 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 38% |
| 19 |
Loudoun United |
3 | 38% |
| 20 |
Oakland Roots |
3 | 33% |
| 21 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 29% |
| 22 |
Hartford Athletic |
2 | 25% |
| 23 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
| 24 |
Rhode Island |
1 | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Indy Eleven |
5 | 83% |
| 2 |
New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
| 3 |
Louisville City |
6 | 67% |
| 4 |
Miami FC II |
3 | 60% |
| 5 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 57% |
| 6 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
4 | 57% |
| 7 |
Phoenix Rising |
5 | 56% |
| 8 |
Charleston Battery |
4 | 44% |
| 9 |
Rhode Island |
4 | 44% |
| 10 |
El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 44% |
| 11 |
Oakland Roots |
3 | 43% |
| 12 |
Lexington |
3 | 43% |
| 13 |
Detroit City FC |
4 | 40% |
| 14 |
North Carolina FC |
3 | 38% |
| 15 |
Hartford Athletic |
2 | 33% |
| 16 |
Monterey Bay |
3 | 30% |
| 17 |
San Antonio |
2 | 29% |
| 18 |
Loudoun United |
2 | 25% |
| 19 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 25% |
| 20 |
Birmingham Legion |
2 | 25% |
| 21 |
Colorado Springs |
2 | 22% |
| 22 |
Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 17% |
| 23 |
Orange County SC |
1 | 14% |
| 24 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
1 | 11% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
13 | 81% |
| 2 |
Birmingham Legion |
13 | 76% |
| 3 |
Hartford Athletic |
10 | 71% |
| 4 |
Loudoun United |
11 | 68% |
| 5 |
Rhode Island |
11 | 68% |
| 6 |
Oakland Roots |
10 | 62% |
| 7 |
Las Vegas Lights |
10 | 62% |
| 8 |
Monterey Bay |
11 | 61% |
| 9 |
Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
| 10 |
Orange County SC |
8 | 57% |
| 11 |
Lexington |
9 | 56% |
| 12 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
| 13 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
| 14 |
San Antonio |
8 | 50% |
| 15 |
Phoenix Rising |
8 | 50% |
| 16 |
Detroit City FC |
8 | 50% |
| 17 |
El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 50% |
| 18 |
Charleston Battery |
8 | 47% |
| 19 |
Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
| 20 |
North Carolina FC |
5 | 33% |
| 21 |
Miami FC II |
5 | 33% |
| 22 |
Louisville City |
5 | 31% |
| 23 |
Indy Eleven |
4 | 26% |
| 24 |
New Mexico United |
3 | 20% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Rhode Island |
6 | 85% |
| 2 |
Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
| 3 |
Hartford Athletic |
6 | 75% |
| 4 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 71% |
| 5 |
Oakland Roots |
6 | 66% |
| 6 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 62% |
| 7 |
Loudoun United |
5 | 62% |
| 8 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 57% |
| 9 |
Lexington |
5 | 55% |
| 10 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 50% |
| 11 |
Monterey Bay |
4 | 50% |
| 12 |
Sacramento Republic |
4 | 50% |
| 13 |
El Paso Locomotive |
3 | 42% |
| 14 |
Charleston Battery |
3 | 37% |
| 15 |
Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
| 16 |
Detroit City FC |
2 | 33% |
| 17 |
San Antonio |
3 | 33% |
| 18 |
Colorado Springs |
2 | 33% |
| 19 |
Miami FC II |
3 | 30% |
| 20 |
Orange County SC |
2 | 28% |
| 21 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 28% |
| 22 |
Louisville City |
2 | 28% |
| 23 |
New Mexico United |
1 | 14% |
| 24 |
North Carolina FC |
0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Tampa Bay Rowdies |
8 | 88% |
| 2 |
Orange County SC |
6 | 85% |
| 3 |
Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 83% |
| 4 |
Colorado Springs |
7 | 77% |
| 5 |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
6 | 75% |
| 6 |
Birmingham Legion |
6 | 75% |
| 7 |
Loudoun United |
6 | 75% |
| 8 |
San Antonio |
5 | 71% |
| 9 |
Monterey Bay |
7 | 70% |
| 10 |
Hartford Athletic |
4 | 66% |
| 11 |
North Carolina FC |
5 | 62% |
| 12 |
Detroit City FC |
6 | 60% |
| 13 |
Oakland Roots |
4 | 57% |
| 14 |
Lexington |
4 | 57% |
| 15 |
El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 55% |
| 16 |
Rhode Island |
5 | 55% |
| 17 |
Charleston Battery |
5 | 55% |
| 18 |
Phoenix Rising |
4 | 44% |
| 19 |
Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 42% |
| 20 |
Sacramento Republic |
3 | 42% |
| 21 |
Miami FC II |
2 | 40% |
| 22 |
Louisville City |
3 | 33% |
| 23 |
New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
| 24 |
Indy Eleven |
1 | 16% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Lexington and Phoenix Rising in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Lexington has come out and scored the first goal in 44% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 56% of matches.
Meanwhile, Phoenix Rising comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 50% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 50% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.