# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
20 | 69% |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
17 | 61% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
17 | 59% |
4 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
17 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Orange County |
14 | 48% |
10 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
14 | 48% |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
14 | 48% |
12 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
13 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
13 | 45% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
13 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 41% |
16 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 41% |
17 |
![]() Miami FC II |
12 | 41% |
18 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 38% |
19 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 38% |
20 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
11 | 38% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 38% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 31% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 31% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 79% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 64% |
6 |
![]() New Mexico United |
9 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 57% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 53% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
7 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
6 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 36% |
22 |
![]() Loudoun United |
5 | 36% |
23 |
![]() Rhode Island |
5 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
4 | 27% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
10 | 67% |
2 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
8 | 53% |
4 |
![]() New Mexico United |
8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
8 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 43% |
11 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 43% |
12 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 40% |
15 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
5 | 36% |
16 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
5 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 33% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 29% |
21 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 29% |
22 |
![]() San Antonio |
4 | 27% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
4 | 27% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
2 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
21 | 72% |
2 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
20 | 68% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
18 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
18 | 62% |
6 |
![]() San Antonio |
18 | 62% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
18 | 62% |
8 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
17 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
17 | 58% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
17 | 58% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
15 | 51% |
15 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
15 | 51% |
16 |
![]() Orange County |
15 | 51% |
17 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
13 | 44% |
18 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
13 | 44% |
19 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
13 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
12 | 42% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 41% |
22 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
12 | 41% |
23 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
11 | 39% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
9 | 31% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
11 | 73% |
2 |
![]() Rhode Island |
10 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Miami FC II |
9 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
8 | 53% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
8 | 53% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
7 | 46% |
14 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
7 | 46% |
15 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 42% |
16 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
6 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 38% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
5 | 35% |
20 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
5 | 35% |
21 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 35% |
22 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 28% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 26% |
24 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
12 | 85% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
11 | 73% |
3 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
10 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 66% |
7 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 64% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
9 | 64% |
10 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 64% |
11 |
![]() Loudoun United |
9 | 60% |
12 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 57% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
8 | 57% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
7 | 50% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
7 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 46% |
21 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 46% |
22 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
7 | 46% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 46% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
5 | 33% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Lexington and Las Vegas Lights in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Lexington has come out and scored the first goal in 41% of the matches they have played so far in the USL Championship. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 58% of matches.
Meanwhile, Las Vegas Lights comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 28% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 72% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL Championship.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.