| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
West Ham United U23 |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 2 |
Leeds United U21 |
20 | 16 | 80% |
| 3 |
Nottingham Forest U21 |
21 | 9 | 43% |
| 4 |
Crystal Palace U21 |
23 | 14 | 61% |
| 5 |
Brighton U21 |
21 | 13 | 62% |
| 6 |
Derby County U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 7 |
Manchester City U21 |
24 | 15 | 63% |
| 8 |
Manchester United U21 |
23 | 15 | 65% |
| 9 |
Chelsea U21 |
22 | 14 | 64% |
| 10 |
Liverpool U21 |
21 | 13 | 62% |
| 11 |
Arsenal U21 |
22 | 17 | 77% |
| 12 |
Everton U21 |
21 | 17 | 81% |
| 13 |
Southampton U21 |
24 | 15 | 63% |
| 14 |
Norwich City U21 |
20 | 12 | 60% |
| 15 |
Newcastle U21 |
21 | 13 | 62% |
| 16 |
Tottenham U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 17 |
Aston Villa U21 |
20 | 17 | 85% |
| 18 |
West Ham United U21 |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 19 |
Leicester City U21 |
21 | 16 | 76% |
| 20 |
Wolves U21 |
21 | 13 | 62% |
| 21 |
Fulham U21 |
22 | 12 | 55% |
| 22 |
Blackburn Rovers U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 23 |
Reading U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 24 |
Middlesbrough U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 25 |
West Bromwich Albion U21 |
20 | 13 | 65% |
| 26 |
Stoke City U21 |
20 | 11 | 55% |
| 27 |
Sunderland U21 |
21 | 15 | 71% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
West Ham United U23 |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 2 |
Leeds United U21 |
10 | 9 | 90% |
| 3 |
Nottingham Forest U21 |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 4 |
Crystal Palace U21 |
13 | 9 | 69% |
| 5 |
Brighton U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 6 |
Derby County U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 7 |
Manchester City U21 |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 8 |
Manchester United U21 |
12 | 8 | 67% |
| 9 |
Chelsea U21 |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 10 |
Liverpool U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 11 |
Arsenal U21 |
11 | 9 | 82% |
| 12 |
Everton U21 |
10 | 9 | 90% |
| 13 |
Southampton U21 |
12 | 9 | 75% |
| 14 |
Norwich City U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 15 |
Newcastle U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 16 |
Tottenham U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 17 |
Aston Villa U21 |
10 | 8 | 80% |
| 18 |
West Ham United U21 |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 19 |
Leicester City U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 20 |
Wolves U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 21 |
Fulham U21 |
11 | 6 | 55% |
| 22 |
Blackburn Rovers U21 |
10 | 9 | 90% |
| 23 |
Reading U21 |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 24 |
Middlesbrough U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 25 |
West Bromwich Albion U21 |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 26 |
Stoke City U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 27 |
Sunderland U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
West Ham United U23 |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 2 |
Leeds United U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 3 |
Nottingham Forest U21 |
11 | 5 | 45% |
| 4 |
Crystal Palace U21 |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 5 |
Brighton U21 |
11 | 6 | 55% |
| 6 |
Derby County U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 7 |
Manchester City U21 |
10 | 8 | 80% |
| 8 |
Manchester United U21 |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 9 |
Chelsea U21 |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 10 |
Liverpool U21 |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 11 |
Arsenal U21 |
11 | 8 | 73% |
| 12 |
Everton U21 |
11 | 8 | 73% |
| 13 |
Southampton U21 |
12 | 6 | 50% |
| 14 |
Norwich City U21 |
10 | 6 | 60% |
| 15 |
Newcastle U21 |
11 | 7 | 64% |
| 16 |
Tottenham U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 17 |
Aston Villa U21 |
10 | 9 | 90% |
| 18 |
West Ham United U21 |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 19 |
Leicester City U21 |
11 | 10 | 91% |
| 20 |
Wolves U21 |
11 | 6 | 55% |
| 21 |
Fulham U21 |
11 | 6 | 55% |
| 22 |
Blackburn Rovers U21 |
10 | 4 | 40% |
| 23 |
Reading U21 |
10 | 8 | 80% |
| 24 |
Middlesbrough U21 |
10 | 7 | 70% |
| 25 |
West Bromwich Albion U21 |
10 | 8 | 80% |
| 26 |
Stoke City U21 |
10 | 5 | 50% |
| 27 |
Sunderland U21 |
11 | 9 | 82% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Leicester City U21 and Stoke City U21 have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Premier League 2 Division One U23.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.